End Market Analysis of Ethiopian Livestock and ... - USAID Microlinks

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ACRONYMS APEDA Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority BSE Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (Mad Cow Disease) CAD Cash Against Document CBPP Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia CCPP Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia EMBRAPA Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation ETB Ethiopian birr FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FAS Foreign Agricultural Service FMD Foot and Mouth Disease GCC Gulf Cooperation Council GFDRE Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia HACCP Hazards Analysis and Critical Control Point KSA Kingdom of Saudi Arabia LC Letter of Credit LMA Livestock Marketing Authority MLA Meat and Livestock Australia MOARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MT Metric Ton OIE World Animal Health Organization RVF Rift Valley Fever SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary SPS-LMM Sanitary and Phytosanitary Livestock and Meat Marketing TAES Texas Agricultural Experiment Station UAE United Arab Emirates USD United States Dollar USDA United States Department of Agriculture END MARKET ANALYSIS OF ETHIOPIAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT i
AUTHOR’S NOTE This end market analysis of Ethiopian livestock and meat was originally intended to include on-the-ground interviews and other primary research. However, as significant recent data was available in trade mission reports, industry websites, trade databases and various studies, it was agreed that an initial end market study be drafted as a desk study, using the available data from secondary sources. The present document is the result of that study. The author made efforts to consult a variety of sources, obtain the most relevant and up-to-date information, and corroborate the findings of this paper with informants on the ground. Trade mission reports and other useful documents from the Sanitary and Phytosanitary-Livestock and Meat Marketing (SPS-LMM) Program and data from FAOSTAT and UN- COMTRADE proved particularly useful, together with reports and studies from a variety of sources. The absolute reliability of every figure reported in these trade databases cannot be verified; nevertheless, in the absence of a thorough market monitoring system, it provides the most useful comparative overview of trade data that is currently available. There are, however, inevitable gaps in data, as information on certain recent developments in the livestock sector (for instance, the impact of the opening of quarantine stations in the Somali ports of Berbera and Bosasso) were not available to the author at the time of writing. Due to these gaps, some of the standard elements of the USAID Value Chain End Market Toolkit (http://www.microlinks.org/ev_en.php?ID=39116_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC), such as the Boston Matrix, were not included. The author’s recommendations for further analysis can be found at the end of this report. It should also be noted that FAOSTAT was used for import data reported in Chapter 3, while UN-COMTRADE was used for export data reported in Chapter 4. This is simply due to the fact that the author used the FAOSTAT database at the beginning of the study, as this source seemed more common in studies and reports. It later became apparent that UN-COMTRADE had more detailed data (e.g. boneless meat vs. carcasses and bone-in cuts, etc.), and the author therefore switched to UN-COMTRADE in order to include a more detailed analysis in Chapter 4. Finally, and most importantly, the author is grateful to the knowledgeable individuals who reviewed the report and provided invaluable comments and insights, including Hank Fitzhugh and Belachew Hurrissa (TAES/SPS-LMM), Yacob Aklilu (Tufts University), Mohamed Abdinoor (USAID/Ethiopia) and Jim Yazman (USAID/EGAT). Their feedback was extremely helpful in updating and deepening the author’s knowledge of the Ethiopian livestock sector. This end market analysis is far stronger for their input. - Elisabeth Farmer, consultant for ACDI/VOCA END MARKET ANALYSIS OF ETHIOPIAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT ii
Page 1 and 2: END MARKET ANALYSIS OF ETHIOPIAN LI
Page 3: CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........
Page 7 and 8: I. CONTEXT A. POLICIES 1. POLICIES
Page 9 and 10: Other airlines (such as Saudi Arabi
Page 11 and 12: D. MEAT PROCESSING FACILITIES 1. EX
Page 13 and 14: II. CHANNELS A. MARKET MAP AND DESC
Page 15 and 16: animals to secondary markets, where
Page 17 and 18: ANIMAL AND CARCASS HANDLING The dis
Page 19 and 20: From the Djibouti quarantine facili
Page 21 and 22: in the illegal export route—makin
Page 23 and 24: III. CUSTOMERS The rapid growth in
Page 25 and 26: Table 3: Major Cattle and Beef Impo
Page 27 and 28: • Goat meat: Goat meat imports ar
Page 29 and 30: SPS/HEALTH STANDARDS Egypt has a la
Page 31 and 32: in Dubai reported that Ethiopia’s
Page 33 and 34: eports 1,914 head of cattle exporte
Page 35 and 36: Currently, the MLA is aggressively
Page 37 and 38: Table 6: 2008 Exports to Middle Eas
Page 39 and 40: enefit from a number of meat export
Page 41 and 42: ($4,065). As with chilled sheep car
Page 43 and 44: V. CHOICES A. SHADED GRID ANALYSIS
Page 45 and 46: understanding of the various segmen
Page 47 and 48: BIBLIOGRAPHY ACDI/VOCA 2008. Djibou
Page 49 and 50: Mousa, Hussein 2009. Saudi Arabia R
Page 51 and 52: ANNEX 1. BRAZIL BEEF EXPORTS TO MID
Page 53 and 54: ANNEX 3. PAKISTAN BEEF EXPORTS TO T
Page 55:
ANNEX 5. NEW ZEALAND BEEF EXPORTS T
show all

End Market Analysis of Ethiopian Livestock and ... - USAID Microlinks

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?