06.03.2013 Views

S.W.A.T. December 2007 - McKeesport Police Department

S.W.A.T. December 2007 - McKeesport Police Department

S.W.A.T. December 2007 - McKeesport Police Department

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENEMY AT THE GATE<br />

CANARY IN THE COAL MINE<br />

OF AMERICAN LIBERTY<br />

BY STEWART RHODES<br />

Prior to the American Revolution,<br />

the British legal system morphed<br />

into a perverse tool of injustice<br />

and oppression in support of usurping<br />

power rather than a safeguard to liberty.<br />

Our current legal system is well along<br />

the same path.<br />

A case in point is that of Arkansas<br />

Militia commander Wayne Fincher, convicted<br />

in federal court for the “offenses”<br />

of possession of a homemade machine<br />

gun and an unregistered short-barreled<br />

shotgun. [See http://www.arkansasmilitia.com/.]<br />

USURPING POWER<br />

NEVER GRANTED<br />

Nowhere in Article I, Section 8 of<br />

the Constitution is there enumerated a<br />

power to regulate or prohibit the keep-<br />

ing and bearing of arms. Where does<br />

Congress “fi nd” this power? While the<br />

1934 National Firearms Act was originally<br />

justifi ed under the power to tax,<br />

the real growth of federal power came<br />

in Wickard v. Filburn (1942), where the<br />

The Court thus created<br />

a federal police power<br />

out of thin air, turning<br />

the Tenth Amendment<br />

on its head.<br />

New Deal Court “found” that Congress’<br />

power to regulate commerce between<br />

the states reached even a farmer growing<br />

wheat for his own consumption, because<br />

such had an indirect “impact” on com-<br />

merce. The Court thus created a federal<br />

police power out of thin air, turning the<br />

Tenth Amendment on its head.<br />

FLEETING STEPS<br />

TOWARD SANITY<br />

Surprisingly, the Court shifted back<br />

toward the Founders’ intent with United<br />

States v. Lopez (1995) and United States<br />

v. Morrison (2000), reading back into the<br />

Constitution some limits on the power<br />

to regulate commerce. Following Morrison,<br />

the Ninth Circuit ruled, in United<br />

States v. Stewart (2003), that it was unconstitutional<br />

for Congress to regulate<br />

the mere possession of homemade machine<br />

guns, which are not for sale and<br />

have not moved in commerce.<br />

This was very good news to Fincher,<br />

who planned to argue that his own en-<br />

34 S.W.A.T. » DECEMBER <strong>2007</strong> SWATMAG.COM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!