22.03.2013 Views

9 Contact Stresses

9 Contact Stresses

9 Contact Stresses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.2 HERTZIAN CONTACT STRESSES 429<br />

5. Suppose that the operating load is fixed at 20 367 N and that the rail and wheel<br />

radii are fixed at 35 and 45 cm, respectively. Find by what factor the tensile strength<br />

of the steel must be increased to make the maximum octahedral shear stress one-half<br />

the yield point value.<br />

Since E and ν of steel are essentially constant for steels of all strengths and A+B<br />

is determined by the fixed radii of rail and wheel, the quantity in Eq. (9.10b) is a<br />

fixed value. Therefore, from (5), the maximum octahedral shear stress would remain<br />

at 195.07 MPa for all steels. Because tensile yield strength and octahedral shear<br />

stress at yield are directly proportional, doubling the tensile strength would result<br />

in the maximum octahedral shear stress being one-half the value that causes yield.<br />

From (1), the strength of the steel would be increased to<br />

σys = (3/ √ 2)(τoct)ys = (3/ √ 2)(2 × 195.07) = 827.6 MPa (8)<br />

6. Determine for which of the three quantities (load, radii of curvature, or steel<br />

strength) would a change be most effective in producing a system with an acceptable<br />

value of maximum octahedral shear stress.<br />

Reducing the load is most ineffective in reducing the maximum octahedral shear<br />

stress because, from (2), the stress varies directly as the cube root of the load. When<br />

the radii of curvature are increased in constant proportion, the maximum octahedral<br />

shear stress varies inversely as the two-thirds power of the radii factor λ [see (6)];<br />

hence changing the radii is more effective than changing the load. However, if large<br />

reductions in stress are required, it is doubtful that the necessarily large changes in<br />

radii (λ = √ 8 = 2.83-fold increase for a halving of the shear stress) would be<br />

feasible. It appears from the previous question that increasing the tensile strength<br />

of the material of construction is the most effective alternative when the stress is<br />

significantly higher than an acceptable level.<br />

Two Bodies in Line <strong>Contact</strong><br />

Two bodies in contact along a straight line before loading are said to be in line contact.<br />

For instance, a line contact occurs when a circular cylinder rests on a plane<br />

or when a small circular cylinder rests inside a larger hollow cylinder. In these line<br />

contact cases, Eqs. (9.5) and (9.6) become<br />

and<br />

A = 0, B = 1 2 (1/R1 + 1/R2)<br />

B/A =∞ (9.16)<br />

It can be shown that in this case, the quantity k in Eq. (9.10c) approaches zero. When<br />

a distributed load q (force/length) is applied, the area of contact is a long narrow<br />

rectangle of width 2b in the x direction and a length 2a in the y direction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!