Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...
Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...
Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
References<br />
ACEEE (2006). American Council for an <strong>Energy</strong>-Efficient Economy, “Valuation of Non-<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> Benefits to Determ<strong>in</strong>e Cost-Effectiveness of Whole-House Retrofit <strong>Program</strong>s: A<br />
literature Review,” Jennifer Thorne Amann, Report Number A061, May 2006.<br />
ACEEE (2012). American Council for an <strong>Energy</strong> Efficient Economy, “A National Survey<br />
of State Policies and <strong>Practices</strong> for the Evaluation of Ratepayer-Funded <strong>Energy</strong><br />
<strong>Efficiency</strong> <strong>Program</strong>s,” Kushler, Nowak, and Witte, Report Number U122, February 2012.<br />
Braman, Matt (2009). Personal communication with Matt Braman at the ETO, January<br />
15, 2009.<br />
CA PUC (2001). California Public Utilities Commission, “California Standard Practice<br />
Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side <strong>Program</strong>s and Projects,” October 2001.<br />
CAPUC (2009). California Public Utilities Commission, "<strong>Energy</strong> Division Resolution E-<br />
4298." December 17, 2009.<br />
CAPUC (2010). California Public Utilities Commission, “Decision Adopt<strong>in</strong>g a Method for<br />
Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the Cost-Effectiveness of Demand Response Activities,” Attachment 1: 2010<br />
Demand Response Cost-Effectiveness Protocols, December 21, 2010.<br />
CAPUC (2011). California Public Utilities Commission, "Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Law Judge’s<br />
Rul<strong>in</strong>g on Updates And Adjustments to <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> Avoided Cost Inputs and<br />
Methodology (Rulemak<strong>in</strong>g 09-11-014)." October 5, 2011.<br />
CA PUC (2012a). California Public Utility Commission, “Cost-Effectiveness Workshop<br />
One: the E3 Avoided Cost Model and Discount Rate,” <strong>Energy</strong> Division, June 28, 2012.<br />
CA PUC (2012b). California Public Utility Commission, “Cost-Effectiveness Workshop<br />
Two: the Standard <strong>Practices</strong> Manual Test,” <strong>Energy</strong> Division, June 29, 2012.<br />
CAPUC Staff (2012). California Public Utility Commission Staff, “Address<strong>in</strong>g Non-<strong>Energy</strong><br />
Benefits <strong>in</strong> the Cost-Effectiveness Framework,” based on research provided by Ed V<strong>in</strong>e<br />
of the California Institute for <strong>Energy</strong> and the Environment, 2012.<br />
CCES (2012a). Center for Climate and <strong>Energy</strong> Solutions, "Climate Debate <strong>in</strong><br />
Congress," available at http://www.pewclimate.org/federal/congress. Accessed May 17,<br />
2012.<br />
CCES (2012b). Center for Climate and <strong>Energy</strong> Solutions, "EPA CLIMATE AND<br />
ENERGY ACTION," available at http://www.pewclimate.org/federal/executive/epa.<br />
Accessed May 17, 2012.<br />
CCES (2012c). "Multi-State Climate Initiatives," available at<br />
http://www.pewclimate.org/states-regions/regional-climate-<strong>in</strong>itiatives. Accessed May 17,<br />
2012.<br />
Center for American Progress (2012). Center for American Progress, “Power for the<br />
People: Overcom<strong>in</strong>g Barriers to <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> for Low-Income Families,” February<br />
2012.<br />
CO PUC (2008). Colorado, Public Utility Commission, “In The Matter Of The Application<br />
Of Public Service Company Of Colorado For Authority To Implement An Enhanced<br />
| 62 <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> <strong>Program</strong> Screen<strong>in</strong>g | www.nhpci.org