22.03.2013 Views

Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...

Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...

Best Practices in Energy Efficiency Program Screening - Synapse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

peak demand. In New England, utilities and competitive suppliers acquire capacity from<br />

the Forward Capacity Market (FCM) (<strong>Synapse</strong> 2011, p.1-3).<br />

Under the FCM, ISO-NE acquires sufficient capacity to satisfy the <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity<br />

requirement it has set for a given power year through a forward capacity auction (FCA)<br />

for that power year. The price for capacity <strong>in</strong> that power year is based upon the results<br />

of the FCA for that year. The FCA for each power year is conducted roughly three years<br />

<strong>in</strong> advance of the start of that year. (<strong>Synapse</strong> 2011, pp.2-4, 2-5).<br />

The 2011 AESC Study’s projection of capacity prices is based on the fourth FCA<br />

(FCA 4) observed supply curve and extrapolations of that curve. This was considered<br />

the best approach for the AESC Study based on the <strong>in</strong>formation available and a fair<br />

representation of the impacts of projected capacity retirements and additions. (<strong>Synapse</strong><br />

2011, p.6-1).<br />

Under the 2011 FCM rules, each FCA will have a ceil<strong>in</strong>g price and a floor price through<br />

the sixth FCA (FCA 6). The status of floor prices for auctions after FCA 6 is at this time<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>. For the first four FCAs, the floors averaged $3.50/kW-month. Each of these<br />

auctions concluded when it reached the floor price (<strong>Synapse</strong> 2011, pp.2-4, 2-5).<br />

Figure A.2. Avoided Capacity Costs<br />

Figure A.2 presents the annual avoided capacity costs developed by the AESC Study,<br />

as well as the 20 year levelized avoided costs (see <strong>Synapse</strong> 2011, App. B). 33 As<br />

33 The avoided capacity costs <strong>in</strong> $/kW-month were converted to $/MWh <strong>in</strong> order to make them comparable<br />

with the other avoided costs presented <strong>in</strong> this appendix.<br />

| 70 <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> <strong>Program</strong> Screen<strong>in</strong>g | www.nhpci.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!