manual for estimation of probable maximum precipitation - WMO
manual for estimation of probable maximum precipitation - WMO
manual for estimation of probable maximum precipitation - WMO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ESTIMATES FOR MID-LATITUDE NON-OROGRAPHIC REGIONS 15<br />
storm area and the moisture source, the mean elevation <strong>of</strong> the ridge, or<br />
cres t, is generally selected as the base <strong>of</strong> the moisture column. In mas t<br />
cases, it is advisable to select the storm and <strong>maximum</strong> dew points between<br />
the barrier and the storm location.<br />
2.3.3 Applicability <strong>of</strong> persisting 12-h dew points <strong>for</strong> all storm<br />
durations<br />
The dew points from a set <strong>of</strong> stations used to obtain a<br />
representative persisting 12-h storm dew point are unlikely to be in the<br />
mas t intense moisture inflow <strong>for</strong> much more than 12 to 24 h, after which the<br />
stations where the dew points were observed are very likely to be in the<br />
cold air because <strong>of</strong> the displacement <strong>of</strong> the storm. The selection <strong>of</strong><br />
different representative 12-h dew points <strong>for</strong> every 12 h <strong>of</strong> a stann is a very<br />
tedious task, especially <strong>for</strong> storm durations <strong>of</strong> 72 h and longer.<br />
Comparisons <strong>of</strong> storm rainfall values adjusted on the basis <strong>of</strong> 12-h dew<br />
points from different sets <strong>of</strong> stations and those from a single set indicate<br />
that differences are too small to justify the additional time required <strong>for</strong><br />
obtaining representative 12-h dew points <strong>for</strong> different storm intervals.<br />
It should be noted also that the use <strong>of</strong> different representative<br />
dew points <strong>for</strong> a storm requires different <strong>maximum</strong> dew points <strong>for</strong> the<br />
maximizing procedures described below. Tests <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> representative<br />
storm dew points over time intervals up to 72 h, e.g., 24-, 48- and 72-h dew<br />
points, <strong>for</strong> adjusting storm rainfall values showed only small differences<br />
from the results obtained from the use <strong>of</strong> the 12-h representative storm dew<br />
point. The general practice is to use a single representative persisting<br />
12-h dew point <strong>for</strong> adjusting the storm rainfall <strong>for</strong> all durations and sizes<br />
<strong>of</strong> area.<br />
2.3.4 Maximization <strong>of</strong> storm in place<br />
Moisture maximization <strong>of</strong> storms in place, i.e., without change in<br />
location, consists simply <strong>of</strong> multiplying the observed storm rainfall amounts<br />
by the ratio (r ) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>maximum</strong> precipitable water (W m ) indicated <strong>for</strong> the<br />
storm reference "location to the precipitable water estimated <strong>for</strong> the storm<br />
(W s )' or<br />
(2.1 )<br />
Thus, <strong>for</strong> example, if the representative persisting 12-h 1000-hPa storm dew<br />
point is·21°C and the <strong>maximum</strong> is 24°C and the rain area is at mean sea-level<br />
(always assumed to be at 1000 hPa) with no intervening topographic barrier<br />
between the rain area and moisture source, then the moisture maximizing<br />
ratio (r m ) is computed from precipitable water values obtained fr.om the<br />
Table A.1.1 in Annex 1:<br />
The precipitable water values<br />
moisture column with base at<br />
Table A.l.3 were used instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> r m would be unchanged.<br />
used in determining Wand Ware <strong>for</strong> a<br />
1000 hPa and top at 30"0 hPa. ff values in<br />
<strong>of</strong> those in Table A.l.1, the resulting value