24.03.2013 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter One: General Introduction<br />

(Connor et al. 2000a). Despite these similarities, long-term studies revealed that the<br />

fish-eating “resident” killer whales along the western coast <strong>of</strong> North America present<br />

a particularly interesting system <strong>of</strong> social structure that has not been yet described in<br />

any terrestrial mammal. Indeed, within these killer whale communities, neither males<br />

nor females disperse from their natal group (while bonobo and chimpanzee females<br />

do disperse). This pattern could be extended to other species <strong>of</strong> delphinids such as<br />

the long-finned pilot whales (as suggested from molecular studies, Amos et al. 1993).<br />

Although these comparisons appear as a promising framework to study the forces<br />

behind the evolution <strong>of</strong> mammalian societies, it is obvious that such investigation is<br />

still limited by the lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge on cetaceans in comparison to that available on<br />

terrestrial mammals. Futhermore, the examples above illustrate the fact that it is not<br />

simple to determine the evolutionary drivers behind the social patterns observed at<br />

sea and on land.<br />

1.3. Investigation <strong>of</strong> population structure<br />

1.3.1. A challenging task in delphinid species<br />

Populations constitute interbreeding units with more or less autonomous dynamics<br />

and recruitment (but note that there are many different definitions <strong>of</strong> 'populations',<br />

(Waples & Gaggiotti 2006)). Whilst the boundaries <strong>of</strong> some populations are rather<br />

obvious, others are not. Yet, a crucial pre-requisite for management and effective<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> any population is a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> its structure within<br />

demographic and evolutionary time scales (Lande & Barrowclough 1987, Taylor &<br />

Dizon 1999). Note that in dolphin studies, and in analogy to primate studies, the<br />

terms “community” or “society” (Struhsaker 1969) have <strong>of</strong>ten been employed as a<br />

complement to, or instead <strong>of</strong>, the term “population” (e.g., Bigg 1982, Wells 1986).<br />

Here, I will employ the definition proposed by Wells (1986, p19) for a dolphin<br />

community: i.e., “an assemblage <strong>of</strong> dolphins that inhabited similar ranges and that<br />

interacted socially more with each other than with adjacent assemblages”.<br />

Investigating dolphin populations or communities poses a particular challenge<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> obvious geographical boundaries and because <strong>of</strong> the mobility<br />

<strong>of</strong> individuals. It is hard to determine the population subdivisions <strong>of</strong> species that have<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!