24.03.2013 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter One: General Introduction<br />

shape local dolphin populations. This finding was supported by behavioural data that<br />

suggested natal philopatry for Shark Bay dolphins (Connor et al. 1992, Smolker et al.<br />

1992, Richards 1996). However, on a larger scale, no such relation <strong>of</strong> isolation-bydistance<br />

was found between the populations <strong>of</strong> bottlenose dolphins from Moray Firth,<br />

north Scotland, and the neighbouring populations (Parsons et al. 2002).<br />

Krützen et al. (2004b) suggested that population structure in male bottlenose<br />

dolphins in Shark Bay may also be related to the evolution <strong>of</strong> mating systems. Males<br />

are known to form alliances which permit these allied males to more successfully<br />

compete for access to females (Connor et al. 1992). Evolutionary theory predicts that<br />

if the males cooperating in this manner are related to each other, then they may gain<br />

inclusive fitness benefits (Hamilton 1964a, b). Long-range dispersal <strong>of</strong> males to other<br />

areas would thus minimise the chance <strong>of</strong> allying with a related partner (it was shown<br />

that long-lasting alliances are biased toward related males, Krützen et al. 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, social system would be simultaneously impacting with geographical<br />

distances on the structure <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

At Sarasota Bay, central west Florida, USA, genetic analyses and extensive<br />

behavioural data also support the hypothesis that the genetic distinction <strong>of</strong> a small<br />

community <strong>of</strong> bottlenose dolphins (in regards to similar neighbouring communities) is<br />

due to their social system (Wells 1986, Duffield & Wells 1991, Sellas et al. 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, however, some gene flow with adjacent communities, thought to be largely<br />

but not exclusively driven by male movements, as illustrated by the sharing <strong>of</strong> mtDNA<br />

haplotypes between communities (Duffield & Wells 2002).<br />

Finally, historical processes might also shape the structure <strong>of</strong> contemporary dolphin<br />

populations. In particular, the glacial/interglacial events <strong>of</strong> the Pleistocene epoch<br />

(1,808,000 to 11,550 years BP) could have played an important role, considering the<br />

recent radiation <strong>of</strong> dolphin species. Hayano et al. (2004) suggested that the lowering<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sea level during the late Pleistocene resulted in the isolation <strong>of</strong> some Pacific<br />

white-sided dolphins in the Sea <strong>of</strong> Japan from the rest <strong>of</strong> the North Pacific population.<br />

This may explain the genetic differentiation currently observed between the<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!