24.03.2013 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter One: General Introduction<br />

Similarly, two populations <strong>of</strong> spinner dolphins from distant islands in the Hawaiian<br />

Archipelago (the Big Island and Midway Atoll) have been found to have different<br />

social organisations (Norris et al. 1994, Karczmarski et al. 2005). In the remote atoll<br />

<strong>of</strong> Midway, spinner dolphins seem to live in a smaller and more stable society, with<br />

no obvious fission-fusion fusion. This is unlike the large groups and fission-fusion<br />

observed in spinner dolphins at the Big Island (Karczmarski et al. 2005). <strong>The</strong> authors<br />

suggest that these disparate characteristics were triggered by different environmental<br />

pressures.<br />

A common pattern in terrestrial mammals is a male-biased dispersal with female<br />

philopatry (Greenwood 1980). Such a pattern also seems to occur in some dolphin<br />

populations, as shown by molecular studies on bottlenose (Möller & Beheregaray<br />

2004) and dusky dolphins (Cassens et al. 2005), and also by long-term demographic<br />

studies (e.g., Wells 1986). However, female philopatry and male dispersal is not<br />

always the rule in dolphins. Long-term studies on killer whales and molecular studies<br />

on long-finned pilot whales have suggested that in some populations <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

species, individuals live in matrilineal groups with no dispersal by either sex (Bigg et<br />

al. 1990, Amos et al. 1993). Such an extreme scenario <strong>of</strong> philopatry has not yet been<br />

described in any terrestrial mammals (Connor 2000). Note that killer whales <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

another example <strong>of</strong> intra-species diversity <strong>of</strong> social structure. In the eastern North<br />

Pacific, communities <strong>of</strong> fish-eating “resident” killer whales (where no dispersal <strong>of</strong><br />

either sex occurs) are more stable than the communities <strong>of</strong> mammal-eating<br />

“transient” killer whales, where individuals <strong>of</strong> both sexes might disperse from their<br />

natal group (Baird & Whitehead 2000). <strong>The</strong> authors suggest that these dissimilar<br />

social structures could be related to differences in foraging ecology.<br />

Among the factors influencing group composition in social mammals, kinship is<br />

thought to play a major role. While an individual can enhance its fitness directly by<br />

maximising its own reproduction (Williams 1966), it can also do so indirectly by<br />

maximising the reproduction <strong>of</strong> its relatives (Hamilton 1964a, b). Following the latter,<br />

kin selection theory predicts that individuals should preferentially associate and<br />

cooperate with kin whenever the inclusive benefits outweigh the costs (Hamilton<br />

1964a, b). In the population <strong>of</strong> Tursiops sp. from Shark Bay, Krützen et al. (2003)<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!