Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINAL REPORT<br />
It was, however, Dalton’s view that this investigation had to be watched closely. He put in<br />
place a monitoring process in relation to the investigation, because Thoy had suggested<br />
initially that this matter would require a task force arrangement. He believed that Thoy was<br />
inclined to over-exaggeration. There was a need to monitor resources under his command.<br />
Dalton said that it was not unusual for him to be involved in decisions about investigators’<br />
travel or whether further testing should be done. He stated that, at the end of the day, if<br />
there was some need for expenditure, the request would come to him. He did not see his<br />
involvement in the Argyle investigation as being different from the amount of involvement<br />
he had in other investigations.<br />
Scott was an Assistant Commissioner at the relevant time. He was aware that Thoy had<br />
been allocated the investigation, because he had discussions with Corfield about the<br />
possibility that Argyle could bear some of the costs. In evidence, Scott made the comment<br />
that he did not have concerns about Thoy’s fitness to be a police officer, but rather his<br />
ability to conduct an investigation such as Argyle. He said that he would not have given the<br />
inquiry to Thoy in the first place.<br />
When asked why he did not arrange to have the investigation moved to someone else,<br />
Scott responded that he could not see the logic in doing that, and that Thoy had proceeded<br />
with the investigation for some time before he became aware of it. Scott also commented<br />
that more was needed than just what he “felt” in order to justify taking a person off an<br />
investigation of this nature.<br />
It appears that several senior officers, at least Trewin and Scott, had reservations about<br />
whether Thoy was an appropriate choice for this investigation. Those reservations appear to<br />
have been based more on perceptions of Thoy’s character than on his ability. The<br />
perception was that Thoy would unnecessarily magnify the amount of work and the<br />
importance of an investigation he was given. The difficulty with such views is, if they were<br />
held at the time, why Thoy was permitted to continue with the investigation. There is a<br />
degree of vagueness and self-contradiction in this management approach. It raises the<br />
distinct possibility that subsequent events, and in particular the fact that Thoy had made<br />
allegations of corruption against senior officers, have coloured the views of those officers.<br />
AN ALLEGED WARNING<br />
Thoy said that, between the time he made the LD application on <strong>14</strong> February 1990 and his<br />
meeting with Trewin on 21 February 1990, he had word that Scott was not happy that he<br />
had the investigation. Thoy stated that this information was given to him in confidence, and<br />
PAGE 434