Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINAL REPORT<br />
Mrs Lynette Crimmins, the former wife of Barry Crimmins, said that she met Noye a number<br />
of times in Roddan’s presence, and can recall Noye saying that he expected to receive<br />
diamonds and cash for assisting Roddan. Roddan is alleged to have said that Noye would<br />
protect her, and that he was to receive a substantial sum of money for writing the matter<br />
off. Noye took a statement from Mrs Crimmins that served to explain away any connection<br />
between her former husband and Roddan that was, she said, almost totally the work of<br />
Noye.<br />
On 4 August 1992, Noye was fined $200 on a disciplinary charge relating to the improper<br />
release of confidential information from the police computer. That charge was not related to<br />
the Argyle investigation. Noye was at the time in the process of writing his final report that<br />
was to recommend that the Argyle investigation be terminated. At about this time, Roddan<br />
instructed his solicitors to approach Argyle and to tell the company that the police did not<br />
have a case against him.<br />
On 3 September 1992, Mrs Crimmins reported that her house had been broken into. Noye<br />
attended and, Mrs Crimmins claimed, suggested that she inflate her insurance claim by<br />
including additional items of property that had not been stolen. In return, Noye was to<br />
receive 10 per cent or $1,000. Mrs Crimmins said that she later gave money to Noye, and<br />
that he led her to believe it was to be used to travel to Victoria on a private trip, during<br />
which he planned to see her former husband.<br />
On 16 September 1992, Noye produced his final report. That report was strongly supportive<br />
of Roddan. In particular, Noye wrote:<br />
PAGE 396<br />
I can categorically state that I am confident that at no future time will any<br />
evidence be disclosed that will provably show that the diamonds claimed by<br />
[Roddan’s company] were illicitly removed from the control of the complainant …<br />
by any person [or that] there is any valid evidence of the existence of an organised<br />
consortium of mine staff and/or others engaged in the theft of diamonds from<br />
Argyle mine.<br />
The report was also highly critical of a number of potential witnesses. The recommendation<br />
that the investigation be concluded was accepted by Noye’s superior officers.<br />
On 18 November 1992, Noye travelled to Victoria on a private holiday and, whilst there, he<br />
arranged to meet with Crimmins. It has been alleged that, during this meeting, he gave<br />
assurances that no one would be charged, and that Crimmins should seek to get back his<br />
job at Argyle.