25.03.2013 Views

Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher

Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher

Chapter 14 argyle - State Law Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL REPORT<br />

Mrs Lynette Crimmins, the former wife of Barry Crimmins, said that she met Noye a number<br />

of times in Roddan’s presence, and can recall Noye saying that he expected to receive<br />

diamonds and cash for assisting Roddan. Roddan is alleged to have said that Noye would<br />

protect her, and that he was to receive a substantial sum of money for writing the matter<br />

off. Noye took a statement from Mrs Crimmins that served to explain away any connection<br />

between her former husband and Roddan that was, she said, almost totally the work of<br />

Noye.<br />

On 4 August 1992, Noye was fined $200 on a disciplinary charge relating to the improper<br />

release of confidential information from the police computer. That charge was not related to<br />

the Argyle investigation. Noye was at the time in the process of writing his final report that<br />

was to recommend that the Argyle investigation be terminated. At about this time, Roddan<br />

instructed his solicitors to approach Argyle and to tell the company that the police did not<br />

have a case against him.<br />

On 3 September 1992, Mrs Crimmins reported that her house had been broken into. Noye<br />

attended and, Mrs Crimmins claimed, suggested that she inflate her insurance claim by<br />

including additional items of property that had not been stolen. In return, Noye was to<br />

receive 10 per cent or $1,000. Mrs Crimmins said that she later gave money to Noye, and<br />

that he led her to believe it was to be used to travel to Victoria on a private trip, during<br />

which he planned to see her former husband.<br />

On 16 September 1992, Noye produced his final report. That report was strongly supportive<br />

of Roddan. In particular, Noye wrote:<br />

PAGE 396<br />

I can categorically state that I am confident that at no future time will any<br />

evidence be disclosed that will provably show that the diamonds claimed by<br />

[Roddan’s company] were illicitly removed from the control of the complainant …<br />

by any person [or that] there is any valid evidence of the existence of an organised<br />

consortium of mine staff and/or others engaged in the theft of diamonds from<br />

Argyle mine.<br />

The report was also highly critical of a number of potential witnesses. The recommendation<br />

that the investigation be concluded was accepted by Noye’s superior officers.<br />

On 18 November 1992, Noye travelled to Victoria on a private holiday and, whilst there, he<br />

arranged to meet with Crimmins. It has been alleged that, during this meeting, he gave<br />

assurances that no one would be charged, and that Crimmins should seek to get back his<br />

job at Argyle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!