02.04.2013 Views

The mythology of ancient Greece and Italy

The mythology of ancient Greece and Italy

The mythology of ancient Greece and Italy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VI<br />

PREFACE.<br />

<strong>The</strong> subjects <strong>of</strong> the plates are all genuine antiques, chiefly<br />

taken from the Galerie Mythologique. <strong>The</strong> errata, which I<br />

have carefully marked, are I think very few considering the<br />

bulk <strong>and</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> the work. In this praise however I claim<br />

no share ; it all belongs to the printers, to whom also belongs<br />

the praise or blame <strong>of</strong> the peculiarities in orthography or<br />

grammar.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following digression will I hope be excused. It is on<br />

a subject—that <strong>of</strong> literary property—in which, from the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> my works, I feel myself interested. As our silence is made<br />

an argument against us, it becomes every author to take an<br />

opportunity <strong>of</strong> expressing his sentiments on it. <strong>The</strong> follow-<br />

ing are mine.<br />

No fallacy can be greater than that <strong>of</strong> supposing that the<br />

public have any rights in this matter unless it be the right <strong>of</strong><br />

the stronger, according to<br />

the simple plan,<br />

That they should take who have the power,<br />

And they should keep who can.<br />

A literary work, whether the creation <strong>of</strong> genius, like Waverley,<br />

or the product <strong>of</strong> toil <strong>and</strong> patient industry, like the present,<br />

is I conceive property in the fullest sense <strong>of</strong> the word, as much<br />

so as l<strong>and</strong>s or houses. To these last the public have a right, but<br />

it is only on giving the full value <strong>of</strong> them, <strong>and</strong> on the prin-<br />

ciple that private feelings <strong>and</strong> interests are not to st<strong>and</strong> in the<br />

way <strong>of</strong> the public good. But this principle does not apply<br />

in any way to literature. What, we may ask, is to be derived<br />

from Waverley <strong>and</strong> such books ? Simply amusement ; <strong>and</strong> it<br />

surely seems very absurd to say that the public has a right<br />

to be amused, to which right those <strong>of</strong> individuals must give<br />

way. It is very much as if the public were to insist on ad-<br />

mission to theatres <strong>and</strong> exhibitions on its own terms, the prin-<br />

ciple <strong>of</strong> the O. P. riots <strong>of</strong> our younger days. No man, be it<br />

observed, will be the worse statesman, lawyer, or physician for<br />

not having read Waverley, so that the plea <strong>of</strong> public utility<br />

cannot be urged. Even in books <strong>of</strong> instruction I deny any<br />

right in the public. Supposing (a most improbable event)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!