Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I think <strong>the</strong> key pas<strong>to</strong>ral dynamic here would be <strong>to</strong> move <strong>the</strong> person <strong>to</strong> trust in God's<br />
merciful forgiveness and <strong>to</strong> try and grow in that trust of God. So pas<strong>to</strong>rally I feel <strong>the</strong><br />
"key" issue is less <strong>the</strong> relative gravity of <strong>the</strong> masturbation, as <strong>the</strong> man's trust in God's<br />
compassion, mercy, understanding, and forgiveness. At least that's <strong>the</strong> direction I would<br />
take.<br />
Hope this helps,<br />
Fr. Jim<br />
Hello Fa<strong>the</strong>r,<br />
I was wondering if you wouldn’t mind reiterating some information we discussed<br />
in class. In <strong>the</strong> last section on bio ethics we discussed a case where a pregnant woman<br />
was <strong>to</strong>ld by medical experts that her child would likely be still born and that <strong>the</strong> chances<br />
of her surviving labor were also quite low. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, if this fetus was removed now it is<br />
highly probable that her chances of carrying ano<strong>the</strong>r child <strong>to</strong> term would be quite high.<br />
In class I was having some confusion as <strong>to</strong> why an abortion of <strong>the</strong> fetus would not be<br />
considered euthanasia and you had stated that <strong>the</strong> Church would consider it, “…..”; I<br />
can’t remember <strong>the</strong> term you used, which is why I am still unclear about this. I wanted <strong>to</strong><br />
follow up with you in class but time is always a valuable commodity. If you wouldn’t’<br />
mind briefly revisiting <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic I’d really appreciate it, thanks.<br />
Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />
Thanks for your e-mail. I think <strong>the</strong> best way <strong>to</strong> frame <strong>the</strong> question/answer is <strong>to</strong> lay out<br />
some definitions first. So let's start with "euthanasia"--<strong>to</strong> practice euthanasia you have <strong>to</strong><br />
have a single, live, au<strong>to</strong>nomous person, who is being put <strong>to</strong> death for <strong>the</strong> purposes of<br />
ending his/her suffering. Taking that definition it would be hard <strong>to</strong> stretch this <strong>to</strong> apply<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> woman or her fetus. I suspect, though, that you probably have some o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
stipulative description of what constitutes "euthanasia" (i.e., I think you're probably using<br />
this term <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>to</strong> what you would understand <strong>to</strong> be involved in this case). I'm not<br />
quite sure just what you're thinking of here, but I'd hazard a guess and suggest that<br />
perhaps you're thinking of this as an elective abortion. An elective abortion is one in<br />
which for one or more reasons a woman elects <strong>to</strong> terminate <strong>the</strong> life of her o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />
viable fetus. This description would cover <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> so-called "right-<strong>to</strong>-choose"<br />
cases espoused by "pro-choice" advocates (in whose number I certainly do NOT count<br />
myself!).<br />
But in our class discussion I believe we speaking of this case along <strong>the</strong> lines of <strong>the</strong><br />
paradigm suggested by <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>to</strong>pic pregnancy. By definition, in current medical<br />
technology, an ec<strong>to</strong>pic pregnancy is ultimately non-viable, which means that regardless<br />
10