Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and <strong>the</strong>n have <strong>the</strong> zygote planted in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> wife's uterus. They are asking me whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
Catholic Church would authorize such a procedure.<br />
Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />
The simple answer is "no"; <strong>the</strong> relevant document is Donum vitae, <strong>the</strong> 1987 Instruction of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Congregation for <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Faith on Reproductive Technologies. This<br />
document essentially considers morally illicit all <strong>the</strong>se procedures (IVF, AIH, ICSI,<br />
GIFT, etc.). This document, though, does not claim <strong>to</strong> bind as an infallible teaching of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Magisterium, and some moral <strong>the</strong>ologians would argue that <strong>the</strong> couple in <strong>the</strong>se<br />
circumstances could proceed with this attempt at assisted reproduction. But if <strong>the</strong>y're<br />
asking what <strong>the</strong> Catholic Church teaches on this matter, <strong>the</strong> answer is a clear-cut "no" <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> request.<br />
The link <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> CDF document is here below:<br />
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con<br />
_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html<br />
Hope this helps,<br />
Fr. Bretzke<br />
Dear Fr. Bretzke,<br />
In my hospital, I'm a very active member of our Ethics committee. I've been perusing<br />
your book again because I'm trying <strong>to</strong> find <strong>the</strong> Church's position on this: I know that if a<br />
mo<strong>the</strong>r's life is in danger, a pregnancy can be terminated. But I think I read somewhere<br />
also that if <strong>the</strong>re is absolutely no chance that a baby will live, such as in <strong>the</strong> case of<br />
anencephaly, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> pregnancy can be terminated even though <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's life is not in<br />
danger but because of <strong>the</strong> emotional distress <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> carry a baby <strong>to</strong> term,<br />
knowing it will die.<br />
Did I read that in your book? I know I heard it somewhere. Sure would appreciate your<br />
help. Thanks, and I hope all is well.<br />
Fr. Bretzke replies,<br />
Thanks for <strong>the</strong> question. No, you didn't read that in my book. It is a case that is still<br />
debated among moralists, and I think it would probably be morally justified <strong>to</strong> terminate<br />
<strong>the</strong> pregnancy in that sort of case, though <strong>the</strong> official Church position would probably<br />
argue for letting <strong>the</strong> baby come <strong>to</strong> term and <strong>the</strong>n allow it <strong>to</strong> die.<br />
Fr. Bretzke<br />
16