03.04.2013 Views

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and <strong>the</strong>n have <strong>the</strong> zygote planted in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> wife's uterus. They are asking me whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

Catholic Church would authorize such a procedure.<br />

Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />

The simple answer is "no"; <strong>the</strong> relevant document is Donum vitae, <strong>the</strong> 1987 Instruction of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Congregation for <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Faith on Reproductive Technologies. This<br />

document essentially considers morally illicit all <strong>the</strong>se procedures (IVF, AIH, ICSI,<br />

GIFT, etc.). This document, though, does not claim <strong>to</strong> bind as an infallible teaching of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Magisterium, and some moral <strong>the</strong>ologians would argue that <strong>the</strong> couple in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

circumstances could proceed with this attempt at assisted reproduction. But if <strong>the</strong>y're<br />

asking what <strong>the</strong> Catholic Church teaches on this matter, <strong>the</strong> answer is a clear-cut "no" <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> request.<br />

The link <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> CDF document is here below:<br />

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con<br />

_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html<br />

Hope this helps,<br />

Fr. Bretzke<br />

Dear Fr. Bretzke,<br />

In my hospital, I'm a very active member of our Ethics committee. I've been perusing<br />

your book again because I'm trying <strong>to</strong> find <strong>the</strong> Church's position on this: I know that if a<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r's life is in danger, a pregnancy can be terminated. But I think I read somewhere<br />

also that if <strong>the</strong>re is absolutely no chance that a baby will live, such as in <strong>the</strong> case of<br />

anencephaly, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> pregnancy can be terminated even though <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's life is not in<br />

danger but because of <strong>the</strong> emotional distress <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> carry a baby <strong>to</strong> term,<br />

knowing it will die.<br />

Did I read that in your book? I know I heard it somewhere. Sure would appreciate your<br />

help. Thanks, and I hope all is well.<br />

Fr. Bretzke replies,<br />

Thanks for <strong>the</strong> question. No, you didn't read that in my book. It is a case that is still<br />

debated among moralists, and I think it would probably be morally justified <strong>to</strong> terminate<br />

<strong>the</strong> pregnancy in that sort of case, though <strong>the</strong> official Church position would probably<br />

argue for letting <strong>the</strong> baby come <strong>to</strong> term and <strong>the</strong>n allow it <strong>to</strong> die.<br />

Fr. Bretzke<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!