Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Protestant ethician Reinhold Niebuhr: "God grant me <strong>the</strong> courage <strong>to</strong> change <strong>the</strong> things I<br />
can, <strong>the</strong> serenity <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> things I cannot, and <strong>the</strong> wisdom <strong>to</strong> know <strong>the</strong> difference!"<br />
Fr. Jim<br />
Hello Fr. James Bretzke<br />
This afternoon in <strong>the</strong> class we were discussing about condoms and it came <strong>to</strong> my mind<br />
that <strong>the</strong> HIV/ADS prevention is quiet strong in my country. We can easily get<br />
information of how <strong>to</strong> use <strong>the</strong> condoms in order <strong>to</strong> prevent <strong>the</strong> virus or for any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
reason. This is possible through commercials on TV, on radio stations, in several<br />
institutions. So I want <strong>to</strong> know if Catholic agencies and institutions can be directly<br />
involved in <strong>the</strong> distributions of condoms?<br />
Thanks<br />
Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />
Thanks for <strong>the</strong> question, which I actually already had tried <strong>to</strong> answer indirectly earlier<br />
in <strong>the</strong> course. Condom distribution <strong>to</strong> prevent AIDS would be an instance of <strong>the</strong><br />
application of <strong>the</strong> principle of <strong>the</strong> minus malum, <strong>the</strong> lesser of two evils. Care must be<br />
taken though that scandal is not given (e.g., that people might falsely conclude that<br />
Catholic institutions are supporting free sex). Some Church leaders argue against<br />
condom distribution and sex education, while o<strong>the</strong>rs argue for it. It's an example of a<br />
prudential judgment, about which good and wise people can come <strong>to</strong> different<br />
conclusions.<br />
Fr. Jim<br />
fa<strong>the</strong>r, my question is on <strong>the</strong> intrinsic evil.<br />
1. Veritatis Splendor # 80 quoting GS # 27 (p. &1 Morally Complex World), states that<br />
whatever is hostile <strong>to</strong> life itself...is an intrinsic evil act. what about <strong>the</strong> person who<br />
commit suicide intentionally <strong>to</strong> save o<strong>the</strong>r people or a friend? (my idea of <strong>the</strong> case is from<br />
<strong>the</strong> movie "The Day After Tomorrow")<br />
2. it is said that in <strong>the</strong> conscience of every individual <strong>the</strong> rational claim axis and <strong>the</strong><br />
sacred claim axis intersect.(p 110) my question is, in <strong>the</strong> act of terrorism, for instance,<br />
bus bombing, many are killed, o<strong>the</strong>rs are wounded and some o<strong>the</strong>rs are injured. What<br />
kind of conscience, or is <strong>the</strong> sacred claim axis still present in <strong>the</strong> conscience of <strong>the</strong> person<br />
who does <strong>the</strong> violence?<br />
Fr. Bretzke Replies:<br />
I'd be careful of reading VS <strong>to</strong> "literally." If that were <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> Church should<br />
have condemned Maximilian Kolbe instead of canonizing him, right? Your question does<br />
point out some of <strong>the</strong> inherent difficulties in using language like "intrinsic evil," and for<br />
48