Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
conundrum of outlawing a relatively minor preventive operation which results in no loss<br />
of life(tubal ligation), while allowing for a much more serious operation (<strong>the</strong><br />
hysterec<strong>to</strong>my) which would result in <strong>the</strong> loss of <strong>the</strong> fetus' life. To point out this sort of<br />
anomaly, though, I do not think constitutes teaching something contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church's<br />
position. In fact, it simply shows more clearly just what <strong>the</strong> Church's teaching is, and<br />
involves, in certain areas.<br />
5) The last point would be a response <strong>to</strong> what constitutes "infallibility." I would direct<br />
your attention <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> definition of infallibility given in Vatican I's Pas<strong>to</strong>r Aeternus (which<br />
is contained in my "Magisterial Exegesis Guidelines" I posted on <strong>the</strong> web-site. That<br />
definition gives <strong>the</strong> criteria clearly for ascribing infallibility <strong>to</strong> magisterial teachings. I<br />
do not see how an unsigned newspaper edi<strong>to</strong>rial quoting an unnamed source could<br />
possibly confer infallibility after <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>to</strong> any previously released magisterial<br />
document. You might also want <strong>to</strong> look at <strong>the</strong> section of Code of Canon Law which deals<br />
with what constitutes departure from authoritatively taught magisterial teaching (e.g.,<br />
heresy) and see how carefully <strong>the</strong> Code sets forward <strong>the</strong> criteria of what constitutes<br />
infallibly taught matters.<br />
I hope this helps.<br />
Fr. Jim<br />
Sexuality is a fundamental element in human nature which plays a foundational role in<br />
our response <strong>to</strong> life (CCC). thus, man's sexuality is not indeed in <strong>the</strong> order of animal<br />
sexuality- not in <strong>the</strong> same nature because animals do reproduce while man and woman is<br />
<strong>to</strong> procreate...(is this morally correct statement?)<br />
Familiaris Consortio speaks not only of procreation but also <strong>the</strong> unitive act of conjugal<br />
love as man and woman becoming one in <strong>the</strong> sacrament of marriage....<br />
now <strong>the</strong>re are various relationship where not geared <strong>to</strong>wards procreation and not for a<br />
unitive act or vice versa like homosexual relationships, pre marital sex among <strong>the</strong> young<br />
people ( which 2 months ago, a research of <strong>the</strong> university of <strong>the</strong> Philippines brought this<br />
issue that teenagers nowadays, roughly from 13-24 years old are in this illicit practices)...<br />
..... (please give a comment on this?)<br />
Above question answered in class<br />
How about INFERTILITY in marriage vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> procreation and unitve act...? What<br />
is <strong>the</strong> church teaching on this matter?<br />
Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />
Thanks for your question, and we'll try and address it in class. For some follow-up<br />
reflections on your own you might want <strong>to</strong> look at how <strong>the</strong> various assertions contained<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Church's magisterial teaching are proven or demonstrated, e.g., in which you state<br />
28