03.04.2013 Views

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

Questions to the Moralist - Personal Web Server - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

conundrum of outlawing a relatively minor preventive operation which results in no loss<br />

of life(tubal ligation), while allowing for a much more serious operation (<strong>the</strong><br />

hysterec<strong>to</strong>my) which would result in <strong>the</strong> loss of <strong>the</strong> fetus' life. To point out this sort of<br />

anomaly, though, I do not think constitutes teaching something contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church's<br />

position. In fact, it simply shows more clearly just what <strong>the</strong> Church's teaching is, and<br />

involves, in certain areas.<br />

5) The last point would be a response <strong>to</strong> what constitutes "infallibility." I would direct<br />

your attention <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> definition of infallibility given in Vatican I's Pas<strong>to</strong>r Aeternus (which<br />

is contained in my "Magisterial Exegesis Guidelines" I posted on <strong>the</strong> web-site. That<br />

definition gives <strong>the</strong> criteria clearly for ascribing infallibility <strong>to</strong> magisterial teachings. I<br />

do not see how an unsigned newspaper edi<strong>to</strong>rial quoting an unnamed source could<br />

possibly confer infallibility after <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>to</strong> any previously released magisterial<br />

document. You might also want <strong>to</strong> look at <strong>the</strong> section of Code of Canon Law which deals<br />

with what constitutes departure from authoritatively taught magisterial teaching (e.g.,<br />

heresy) and see how carefully <strong>the</strong> Code sets forward <strong>the</strong> criteria of what constitutes<br />

infallibly taught matters.<br />

I hope this helps.<br />

Fr. Jim<br />

Sexuality is a fundamental element in human nature which plays a foundational role in<br />

our response <strong>to</strong> life (CCC). thus, man's sexuality is not indeed in <strong>the</strong> order of animal<br />

sexuality- not in <strong>the</strong> same nature because animals do reproduce while man and woman is<br />

<strong>to</strong> procreate...(is this morally correct statement?)<br />

Familiaris Consortio speaks not only of procreation but also <strong>the</strong> unitive act of conjugal<br />

love as man and woman becoming one in <strong>the</strong> sacrament of marriage....<br />

now <strong>the</strong>re are various relationship where not geared <strong>to</strong>wards procreation and not for a<br />

unitive act or vice versa like homosexual relationships, pre marital sex among <strong>the</strong> young<br />

people ( which 2 months ago, a research of <strong>the</strong> university of <strong>the</strong> Philippines brought this<br />

issue that teenagers nowadays, roughly from 13-24 years old are in this illicit practices)...<br />

..... (please give a comment on this?)<br />

Above question answered in class<br />

How about INFERTILITY in marriage vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> procreation and unitve act...? What<br />

is <strong>the</strong> church teaching on this matter?<br />

Fr. Bretzke replies:<br />

Thanks for your question, and we'll try and address it in class. For some follow-up<br />

reflections on your own you might want <strong>to</strong> look at how <strong>the</strong> various assertions contained<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Church's magisterial teaching are proven or demonstrated, e.g., in which you state<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!