05.04.2013 Views

Chapter -1 final last new font final - petrofed.winwinho...

Chapter -1 final last new font final - petrofed.winwinho...

Chapter -1 final last new font final - petrofed.winwinho...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PetroFed THE JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM FEDERATION OF INDIA<br />

PETROFED<br />

JANUARY-MARCH 2009 VOL. 7 ISSUE 1


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Contents<br />

S. No. Particulars Page No.<br />

1. From the Chairman 1<br />

2. DG's Report 2<br />

3. Refining – The Challenge for Green Technologies 3<br />

By Mr. M. K. Joshi, Director (Technical), Engineers India Limited<br />

4. Non-OPEC Decline Rates Accelerate 9<br />

By Mr. Bob MacKnight, Lead Analyst, PFC Energy<br />

5. Risk Management in E&P 11<br />

By Mr. Rajiv Puri, Associate Director, Advisory Services,<br />

Ernst & Young Pvt. Limited<br />

6. High Performance Trays in Distillation Operation 13<br />

By Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee, Group Leader –<br />

Process, Lurgi India Company Pvt. Limited<br />

7. Oil & Gas Deals Update 2008 16<br />

By Mr. Deepak Mahurkar, Associate Director,<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Limited<br />

8. Project Management Is Not Merely For Project Managers 20<br />

By Mr. Raj Kalady, Managing Director, PMI India<br />

9. An Energy Saving Option in Process Industry 22<br />

By Prof. Hamid Ali, Director of Petroleum Studies,<br />

Aligarh Muslim University<br />

10. Strike when the Iron Is Hot… 26<br />

A Thought Leadership Paper by Petrofed<br />

11. Events 35<br />

Journal Coordinators<br />

Mr. R.P. Natekar BPCL<br />

Mr. S. Ramasubramanian Chevron Lubricants India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Mr. Sayed Ansar Shah CPCL<br />

Mr. Jignesh Vasavada GAIL (India) Ltd.<br />

Mr. Ashim Ganguly Indian OilTanking Ltd.<br />

Mr. M. Kalikrishna IOCL<br />

Mr. A.K. Maiti NRL<br />

Mr. Pramode Seth ONGC<br />

Mr. P.N. Barua Oil India Ltd.<br />

Dr. Anand Teltumbde Petronet India Ltd.<br />

Mr. Deepak Mahurkar PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Editorial Board<br />

Editor<br />

Members<br />

:<br />

:<br />

Y. Sahai<br />

A. K. Arora<br />

S. L. Das<br />

O. P. Thukral<br />

(No part of this journal shall be<br />

reproduced in whole or in part by any<br />

means without permission from<br />

PetroFed.<br />

The views expressed by various authors<br />

and information provided by them are<br />

solely from their sources. The publishers<br />

and editors are in no way responsible<br />

for these views and may not necessarily<br />

subscribe to these views.)


As I sit down to pen this piece, the world awaits<br />

with bated breath the outcome of the G-20<br />

meeting of world leaders. And ahead of the G-20<br />

Summit the World Bank has more than halved its<br />

GDP growth projections for the developing world<br />

to 2.1% in 2009 from its earlier projection of 4.4%<br />

in November, 2008. The growth in 2008 was<br />

5.8%.<br />

The <strong>new</strong> Global Economy Prospects update also<br />

notes that global growth is expected to contract by<br />

1.7% this year. This would be the first decline in<br />

world output since World War II. GDP is projected<br />

to decline by 3% in OECD countries and by 2% in<br />

other high income economies.<br />

The World Trade Organisation while projecting<br />

that the economic downturn will drive exports<br />

down by roughly 9% in volume terms in 2009,<br />

warns that the increasing trade restrictive<br />

measures could undermine efforts to recover the<br />

global economy. The risk of Governments ceding<br />

ground to protectionist pressure is also expected<br />

to be addressed at the G-20 meeting. According<br />

to WTO while the contraction in developed<br />

countries will be particularly severe, with exports<br />

falling by 10% this year, they are likely to shrink by<br />

2 to 3% in developing countries, which are more<br />

dependant on trade for growth.<br />

From the Chairman<br />

1<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

management policies have helped build a<br />

protective shield of foreign exchange reserves.<br />

India is no exception.<br />

India's economic growth prospects in 2009 have,<br />

however, been reduced to 4.3% by the<br />

Organisation for Economic Co-operation &<br />

Development – the lowest growth in 18 years. The<br />

ADB and IMF, however, project a growth of 5 and<br />

5.1% respectively. All these are much lower than<br />

the internal assessment of over 6% growth. All of<br />

them also predict that growth will bounce back in<br />

2010.<br />

The global economic downturn has also seen<br />

crude oil prices come down substantially from the<br />

<strong>last</strong> year highs. The recent World Bank report<br />

expects them to remain at more than 50% below<br />

2008 levels averaging USD 47 per barrel for the<br />

current year.<br />

Energy demand between now and 2030 is<br />

expected to increase by 50% with two third of the<br />

<strong>new</strong> demand coming from developing nations.<br />

The increase in focus on environmental impact<br />

may, however, modify the energy mix, or atleast<br />

the fossil fuel energy demand. Petroleum and<br />

other liquid fuels will no doubt remain the<br />

important fuels for transportation for some time to<br />

come but natural gas usage may see a sharper<br />

increase because of its efficiency and<br />

environmental impact.<br />

There in no denying the fact, however, that food<br />

security through sustainable agriculture and<br />

energy security through increasing energy<br />

efficiency and investment in re<strong>new</strong>able sources<br />

will be important elements in the growth of<br />

developing countries.<br />

According to a UN study the convergence of<br />

The Asian Development Bank has also called for<br />

recession in developed countries, food and fuel<br />

better targeting of food and fertilizer subsidies by<br />

price volatility and climate change calamities pose<br />

India and improved cost recovery by oil marketers<br />

an unprecedented threat to development in the<br />

and refineries to sustain fiscal deficit. It is,<br />

Asia Pacific region. Not only did the crude oil<br />

therefore, imperative that the Government takes<br />

prices soar to historical levels <strong>last</strong> year, food and<br />

advantage of the drop in crude oil prices to target<br />

commodity prices also increased to the highest<br />

subsidies only for the needy and deserving in a<br />

level in over 20 years. There was an increase in<br />

transparent and efficient manner and moves<br />

the price of staple food, rice, by a staggering 150%<br />

towards market determined prices.<br />

in only four months. The region also suffered<br />

Such an action shall eliminate several distortions,<br />

climate change calamities. Developing countries<br />

strengthen the national economy and prove<br />

in the Asia Pacific region have shown, according to<br />

healthy for the industry.<br />

the study, that they are better prepared for a<br />

financial crisis. Over the past decade, their<br />

regulatory reforms in the financial sector,<br />

combined with cautious macroeconomic S. Behuria


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

DG's Report<br />

2<br />

under international trade law. Argentina, for<br />

example, has put <strong>new</strong> licensing requirements on<br />

several goods to create a <strong>new</strong> layer of<br />

bureaucracy for overseas exporters. The<br />

European Union has announced a <strong>new</strong> export<br />

subsidy on some items. China and India have<br />

increased tax rebates for domestic exporters<br />

which is being seen by critics as providing a stealth<br />

subsidy.<br />

The fear is that actions like these could touch off<br />

The economic downturn has affected all –<br />

Governments, Corporates, and individuals. Each<br />

is trying to find a solution. In an inter-dependent<br />

world, where the actions of one impact the others<br />

in different measures, there are no ready<br />

solutions. One should, however, learn from the<br />

past and avoid the earlier pit falls.<br />

The downturn in the 1990s led to weak oil prices<br />

and a virtual price collapse towards the end of the<br />

decade. The resulting lack of capital investment,<br />

downsizing and cost cutting strategies led to lack<br />

of R&D for <strong>new</strong> technologies, depleted skilled<br />

manpower, and insufficient <strong>new</strong> discoveries. This<br />

should not be repeated in the current downturn.<br />

Money may be hard to come by but investments<br />

should not dry up. A skilled workforce takes time<br />

to develop. Technologies evolve after persistent<br />

hard work. And the technological challenge is<br />

greater than ever before because of<br />

environmental concerns. I only hope that the oil &<br />

gas companies will not go into their cocoon but<br />

shall continue to pursue their growth plans, albeit<br />

within their manageable resources.<br />

This would also spur global trade which is<br />

expected to witness further contraction during the<br />

current year. There is a 'worrying' trend observed<br />

toward protectionism as countries rush to shield<br />

their ailing domestic industries during the global<br />

economic crisis. According to a mid-March World<br />

Bank Report atleast 17 of the 20 major nations<br />

that vowed at a 2008 November Summit to avoid<br />

protectionist steps that could spark a global trade<br />

war have violated that promise. Large countries,<br />

countermeasure that could lead to broader trade<br />

wars. Protectionist measures may also sharply<br />

worsen the collapse of global trade, which the<br />

World Bank said, is facing its steepest decline in 80<br />

years as global demand dries up.<br />

PetroFed has consistently advocated and<br />

recommended creation of a level playing field for<br />

all players in the industry. The industry<br />

recommendations to the Government for NELP-<br />

VIII and CBM-IV sent in early February, 2009<br />

advocated the same.<br />

During January, a request was made to the<br />

Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of<br />

Commerce & Industry and the Ministry of<br />

Petroleum & Natural Gas for inclusion of<br />

petroleum products under the 'Market Linked<br />

Focused Product Scheme' to offset freight<br />

disadvantage on export of petroleum products,<br />

and help the nation earn more foreign exchange.<br />

Request made earlier to CBEC for a resolution of<br />

the issue pertaining to Classification of Naphtha<br />

was reiterated. The MoP&NG was also requested<br />

to resolve the issue of tax holiday under section 80<br />

IB (9) available for commercial production of<br />

crude oil which has been denied in some cases.<br />

The most significant was the release of a Thought<br />

Leadership Paper during Petrotech-2009<br />

advocating decontrol of petroleum product<br />

pricing in the favourable environment of falling<br />

crude oil prices. Recommendations are being<br />

forwarded to Government on learnings from<br />

Japan on auto fuel quality implications.<br />

from Russia to the United States to China have<br />

enacted measures aimed at limiting the flow of<br />

imported goods.<br />

The events conducted during the quarter are<br />

incorporated in the journal. So is the Thought<br />

Leadership Paper recommending market<br />

According to the World Bank, since <strong>last</strong> November, determined prices of petroleum products.<br />

a host of nations have imposed a total of 47<br />

measures that restrict trade at the expense of the<br />

other countries. The most obvious trade<br />

restrictions – raising tariffs or taxes on imports –<br />

represent only about a third of all measures taken.<br />

But most are taking more creative steps that fall<br />

These critical issues warrant prompt action by the<br />

concerned Government authorities for<br />

implementation. Support at this critical juncture<br />

can spur growth in the ensuing fiscal.<br />

into the grey area of what is considered legal A. K. Arora


India-The Energy Scenario<br />

Refining - The Challenge For<br />

Green Technologies<br />

M. K. Joshi<br />

Director (Technical), Engineers India Limited<br />

3<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Drivers behind Refinery Configuration and<br />

Choice of Technology<br />

Today grassroots projects of world scale capacities<br />

are being set up and existing refineries are<br />

evolving into large, complex units, the growth of<br />

which has been driven by a combination of the<br />

following:<br />

• Freedom of choice in selection of crude oils to<br />

be processed coupled with availability of<br />

heavier/opportunity crude oils and favourable<br />

price differentials between these crude oils<br />

and lighter crude oils. Increased demand of<br />

refined products conforming to Euro IV and<br />

better specifications.<br />

To meet the requirements of sustained economic<br />

growth, India needs to ensure sustained energy<br />

supply and improve the quality and reliability of<br />

the energy being provided. The following table • Compliance with environmental regulations.<br />

illustrates the growth (in MMTOE) that is<br />

anticipated over the next two and a half decades.<br />

• Changing product demand – a shift to lighter<br />

distillates and more value added products,<br />

through residue conversion and product<br />

Year India World<br />

treatment<br />

2006-07 315<br />

11400<br />

• Increased value addition to remain<br />

competitive in the current scenario through<br />

2030-31 1600<br />

17700<br />

integration with downstream operations, e.g.<br />

production of petrochemicals<br />

It is clear that the growth rate in India is well above • Capability to process feedstock derived from<br />

the global rate. If India is to sustain the current fossil and non-fossil sources<br />

economic growth rate, ensuring quality of energy<br />

supplies and environmental stipulations will be<br />

most challenging. The primary energy source over<br />

the next two decades and beyond will continue to<br />

be fossil fuel based, with coal contributing 45-50%<br />

of the total requirements, followed by crude oil.<br />

• Availability of increasing quantities of<br />

condensate and natural gas liquids. This<br />

provides the option to produce cleaner fuels<br />

and to integrate refinery and petrochemical<br />

operations.<br />

The refining sector will, therefore, have a key role<br />

to play in the supply of clean forms of energy while<br />

simultaneously ensuring continued viability and<br />

profitability of operations through a number of<br />

measures. The likely objectives for future refinery<br />

operations are presented in the following table.<br />

It is therefore not surprising to see projects being<br />

conceived with co processing of crude oil, gas and<br />

condensate to provide necessary flexibility to<br />

produce a mix of transportation fuels and<br />

petrochemicals.<br />

Objective Issues<br />

Energy<br />

security<br />

Environmental<br />

compliance<br />

• Process heavier and sour feeds-extra heavy<br />

crude oil, tar sands, oil shale.<br />

• Co process feed from non fossil sources e.g.<br />

biomass<br />

• Integrate Gas/coal processing ( GTL/CTL) with<br />

refining to produce fuels and petrochemicals<br />

• Produce Clean fuels<br />

• Cleaner options for hydrogen production Capture<br />

and sequester CO2 from Hydrogen and Power<br />

generation facilities<br />

Product Specifications<br />

In the <strong>last</strong> decade product specifications attracted<br />

close attention of environmentalists as well as<br />

original equipment manufacturers to ensure<br />

compliance with environmental stipulations as<br />

well as optimal equipment performance. Diesel<br />

and gasoline have been specifically targeted for<br />

quality improvement with the result that refiners<br />

are now targeting Euro III/Euro IV specifications of<br />

these products in conformance with the road map<br />

laid down in the Auto Fuels Policy of the<br />

Government of India. Initiatives are also being


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

taken with a view to making Ultra Low Sulphur • Adequate capacity of secondary conversion<br />

Gasoline and Diesel to meet even more stringent and residue upgrading facilities to ensure<br />

quality standards, particularly with an eye on the high overall yields of light and middle<br />

export market. Lubricating oils are also being distillates<br />

looked at with a view to meeting API Grade<br />

II/Grade III specifications to meet the market<br />

requirements. This has necessitated a close<br />

examination of refinery configurations and almost<br />

all the refineries have taken action to implement<br />

projects, which would enable them to meet the<br />

• A p p r o p r i a t e u p g r a d i n g f a c i l i t i e s<br />

(Hydrodesulphurization, CCR Reforming,<br />

Isomerization, alkylation etc) to meet product<br />

quality complying with Euro IV or better<br />

specifications.<br />

future product specifications while ensuring that<br />

operations remain profitable.<br />

Figure 1 Illustrates a refinery configuration in<br />

which processing facilities are incorporated to<br />

A standalone refinery configuration in the present produce motor spirit and diesel in line with Euro IV<br />

context would target a high Nelson Complexity specifications or better, while meeting<br />

Factor to ensure that it has the following e n v i r o n m e n t a l e m i s s i o n s t i p u l a t i o n s<br />

capabilities:<br />

incorporated. Currently refineries in India are<br />

close to this configuration, which is a far cry from<br />

• Flexibility to handle heavy and sour crude oils,<br />

with suitable provisions to process opportunity<br />

crudes.<br />

the hydroskimmimng and low conversion<br />

configurations that were prevalent in the 1980's.<br />

Figure 1: Current Refinery Configuration<br />

4


5<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Yield and Product Slate Improvement<br />

refining and petrochemicals business can be<br />

realized.<br />

Residue conversion options are being revisited to<br />

arrive at techno commercially feasible options to<br />

increase overall distillate yields beyond 80-82%<br />

and reduce the production of heavy ends. With<br />

an increasing thrust towards value addition,<br />

configuration studies are now looking at higher<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Benefit from the higher demand growth and<br />

return for petrochemicals versus fuels.<br />

Control over petrochemical feedstock costs<br />

helps to maintain margins in petrochemical<br />

products<br />

capacities (low cost expansion) to derive benefits<br />

of economies of scale and possible integration<br />

with a petrochemical complex, so that more value<br />

can be added to the refining operations. Such<br />

integrations add significantly to the refining<br />

• Reduced capital and operating costs on<br />

account of shared infrastructure and reduced<br />

emissions as compared to standalone<br />

facilities.<br />

margins but they come at a price. The approach to<br />

such integrations would be to phase the<br />

investments e.g. initially in a refinery and<br />

aromatics complex and then add the olefins<br />

production facilities, an approach that has been<br />

followed by the Panipat refinery of M/s Indian Oil<br />

corporation Ltd. At times it may make more sense<br />

to follow the reverse sequence, i.e., set up the<br />

olefins/aromatics production facilities based on<br />

feed from other sources and gradually integrate<br />

backwards with refining. Figure 2 illustrates some<br />

possible linkages between a refinery and a<br />

petrochemicals complex.<br />

It is not surprising that a number of mega projects<br />

envisaging the setting up of integrated refinery<br />

cum petrochemical projects are at different stages<br />

of implementation. The Reliance Refinery at<br />

Jamnagar and the Panipat Refinery of IOCL are<br />

two leading examples. The Paradip Refinery<br />

Project of IOCL is planned on similar lines, but<br />

with a phasing of expenditure. A number of other<br />

feasibility reports have been prepared for projects<br />

that envisage similar refinery/petrochemical<br />

linkages. It is understood that similar facilities are<br />

also planned to be set up in China and Saudi<br />

Arabia.<br />

Figure 2: Possible Refinery/Petrochemical linkages<br />

Gasification for residue Upgrading<br />

The refinery/petrochemicals linkage offers a<br />

number of other benefits, which include: As discussed earlier, residue upgrading projects<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Flexibility to shift the balance of production<br />

between fuels and petrochemicals<br />

Advantage of different economic cycles of the<br />

are being pursued quite actively, with the objective<br />

of monetizing heavy residual streams. The<br />

technology options could involve either Hydrogen


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

addition or carbon rejection. Currently the latter phased approach to arrive at the above<br />

option appears to be finding favour as processes configuration. This could possibly proceed on the<br />

like delayed coking integrate easily with refining following lines.<br />

operations and also require relatively less<br />

investment. However the processes do not really 1. Examine the feasibility of integration<br />

achieve 100% residue conversion and the refiners coke/residue gasification to implement the<br />

still have to address the problem of coke or fuel oil IGCC technology for power or poly generation<br />

disposal, though to a smaller extent. The ( steam, power and hydrogen) to meet captive<br />

development of gasification technology and requirements, with export of any surplus<br />

improvements in reliability/availability offer an power .High costs still come in the way of<br />

effective option to convert all heavy residue to ready application of this option and costs of<br />

value added products This option could merit around $2MM/MW are being typically<br />

serious thought in future as it would not only reported. The IGCC technology has been<br />

contribute towards an improved product slate, but successfully integrated by Shell in refinery<br />

also help to meet the Hydrogen and power operation, using heavy residue as feed. Earlier<br />

requirements of the refinery from low value feed there were issues with regard to the reliability<br />

stock. At the same time, it could reduce the and availability of the gasifiers-these appear<br />

emissions of Sox, NOx and particulate matter. A to have been addressed to a significant extent.<br />

case study for a refinery has indicated that a However the option of having some fall back<br />

gasification facility based on 90 t/hr of heavy option for power and Hydrogen supply in case<br />

residue could meet captive power requirements of of gasifier downtime would have to be<br />

68MW, Hydrogen requirement of about 66000 examined while carrying out the optimization<br />

TPA and export 116 MW of power to the grid. The of the refinery configuration.<br />

economics have been shown to be quite attractive<br />

for the gasification facility on a stand alone basis, 2. Look into the possibility of integrating FT<br />

but it would be better to look at the overall refinery synthesis to recover high value distillates from<br />

with and without gasification to arrive at the syngas produced via gasification or reforming.<br />

economics. This issue is probably better addressed when it<br />

is considered with a refinery that has suitable<br />

There is a need to carry out a systematic and hydroprocessing facilities, so that the FT<br />

detailed techno economic analysis, looking at a products can be suitably upgraded. It also<br />

Figure 3: Integration of Refinery with Gas Processing<br />

6


7<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

offers potential advantages to the refinery in<br />

terms of the Hydrogen and steam balance,<br />

oil, with fewer secondary processing facilities.<br />

offering the possibility of releasing some of Refining operations by themselves contribute only<br />

the refinery streams for further value addition. a small portion of GHG emissions when compared<br />

with the emissions on account of fuel combustion<br />

The technologies envisaged in the above by the end users. Almost 80 % of CO2 emissions<br />

approach are well proven. Liquid fuels derived are on account of fuel combustion, while about<br />

from the FT process have been produced since 10-12% is contributed by refining. There is little<br />

before World War II. Sasol have been using low that can be done to lower the CO2 emissions from<br />

grade coal to produce fuels since the 1950's via fuel combustion, unless we move to a scenario in<br />

this route and today, a number of projects for which refining operations are altered such that the<br />

power and Chemicals generation are at different end product from the refinery is Hydrogen. In such<br />

stages of implementation in China. Majors like a scenario 100% of the carbon contained in the<br />

Sasol Exxon Mobil, Shell and Conoco have carried crude oil would be released as CO2. On paper,<br />

out developments in the FT synthesis process- the saving grace of such an alternative is that it<br />

concentrating on reactor and catalyst related offers the possibility of capturing all the CO2 at a<br />

issues for improvements in selectivity and plant single location. This is presently a remote<br />

economics. scenario, but it does help to point out that in our<br />

pursuit of compliance with clean fuel quality, we<br />

Variation in Crude Oil price by about $ 20/bbl can are in effect generating increasing quantities of<br />

seriously impact the return on investment for a Carbon Dioxide and need to intensify efforts to<br />

CTL project based on the FT route. Given the reduce GHG emissions. These efforts offer the<br />

nature of investments involved in the GTL /CTL following benefits:<br />

options, it is imperative to carry out detailed site<br />

specific studies to establish the viability under<br />

different scenarios of Crude oil and gas prices. The<br />

same would apply for processes involving direct<br />

coal liquefaction through Hydrogen addition.<br />

Considering the position of coal reserves and the<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Lower Energy Costs – it makes good sense<br />

environmentally and economically to use<br />

energy more efficiently and simultaneously<br />

reduce or eliminate GHG missions.<br />

Extend the world's energy resources<br />

need to utilize them to the maximum extent, it may<br />

not be far fetched to think in terms of a “coal<br />

“refinery in future.<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Meet and beat the competition to provide<br />

better product quality<br />

Meet rising expectations for <strong>new</strong> products,<br />

With the availability of Gasification, another<br />

<strong>new</strong> technologies.<br />

potential linkage between refinery and<br />

gas/petrochemicals offers itself for consideration.<br />

Figure 3 indicates how this could be done.<br />

Optimization of CO2 emissions presents refiners<br />

with a real challenge, particularly where<br />

emissions trading schemes have been introduced.<br />

Green house gas emissions and abatement<br />

Some of the areas in which a charge for CO2<br />

emissions can drive changes in refinery operations<br />

While the above are representative of the<br />

challenges and opportunities that can be met<br />

through the application of mature technology<br />

and even in the actual configuration selected for<br />

the refinery may involve a combination of the<br />

following:<br />

options, the flip side presents issues related to • Efficiency Improvement<br />

higher energy consumption and resulting increase<br />

in emissions of Carbon Dioxide. Increasingly<br />

stringent product specifications have addressed<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Crude and fuel substitution<br />

Residue upgrading<br />

issues related to SOx, NOx, Volatile Organic<br />

Compounds and Particulate Matter through a<br />

combination of modification in the molecular<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Hydrogen production<br />

Carbon sequestration<br />

structure of the fuels and an increase in their<br />

Hydrogen content through the application of a<br />

• Modeling CO2 in LP<br />

suite of processes that are well established. The issues that have been discussed in the<br />

Carbon Dioxide, however remains a major issue. foregoing sections give a pointer to what lies<br />

It is not simple to track refining green house gas ahead and the future could see a lot of emphasis<br />

generation, but it can be assumed that processing on some of the following:<br />

of heavier and sour crude oils is expected to result<br />

in a major increase of GHG emissions as<br />

compared to a refinery based on light sweet crude<br />

• Production of Bio fuels that have higher<br />

energy densities than ethanol and bio diesel<br />

and are compatible with petroleum based


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

products requirements and solutions will have to be site<br />

• Hydrogenation of fats and vegetable oils in a<br />

Diesel Hydrotreater to produce green diesel<br />

specific. However, a number of issues need to be<br />

addressed. These include the following:<br />

• Production of Syngas from biomass followed<br />

by FT synthesis to produce Hydrocarbon<br />

• Global considerations of supply and demand<br />

as well as product quality<br />

liquids • Increasing trend towards cleaner refined<br />

• Catalytic cracking of fats and oils to produce<br />

products<br />

green gasoline • Shift towards increasingly heavier crude mix<br />

• Pyrolysis or hydrothermal upgrading of<br />

biomass to provide liquids that are suitable for<br />

and oil continuing its dominance as a source<br />

of energy<br />

co processing with conventional crudes • Greater conversion capacity with emphasis on<br />

• GTL/CTL integration with refining –with<br />

accompanying challenges of CO2 capture<br />

and sequestration<br />

residue upgrading as natural gas replaces<br />

residual fuel for power generation in the<br />

energy sector<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Hydrogen production with CCS options<br />

Hydrogen and energy pinch<br />

• Meeting increasingly stringent emission<br />

norms and addressing issues related to<br />

Carbon Dioxide capture and sequestration<br />

• Heavy Oil processing will remain important in<br />

future but it is quite likely that the refining<br />

industry would, in addition, be looking at a<br />

scenario in which clean fuels, petrochemicals<br />

and chemicals are also produced from Bio-<br />

feeds provided that reliable supplies and<br />

facilities for ensuring availability of feed are in<br />

place. The feeds are not very familiar to the<br />

refiners and this lack of experience leads to an<br />

area of risk that needs to be managed<br />

effectively. A major challenge is to ensure<br />

that re<strong>new</strong>able fuel technologies should stand<br />

on their own economic merit and not rely on<br />

subsidies etc.<br />

Conclusion<br />

There has been a transformation in the face of the<br />

Indian Refining Industry in the recent past. The<br />

increasing emphasis on product quality,<br />

profitability and efficiency has thrown up a<br />

number of challenges that the refineries have to<br />

meet There is no generic configuration to meet all<br />

Snippets<br />

8<br />

Forward and backward integration is accordingly<br />

being given due consideration. The concept of<br />

refinery super sites needs careful examination.<br />

Thus two or three refineries, which are physically<br />

quite far from each other, could look into<br />

synergizing their operations, so that low value<br />

streams from one refinery can get upgraded at<br />

the other site. The accompanying issues of<br />

transportation costs, environmental stipulations,<br />

space availability etc will all need to be examined.<br />

There is a need to educate the customers about<br />

the quality and efficiency of the energy sources<br />

they use. Customers must realize that using a litre<br />

of petrol or a cubic metre of natural gas translates<br />

into more GHG's than producing these forms of<br />

energy. Providing customers with the information<br />

they need to better understand the issue of global<br />

climate change and how they can play a role in<br />

managing their energy use wisely would<br />

contribute meaningfully to addressing the world's<br />

climate change challenge.<br />

Average annual growth rate of net Percentage of India's banking Total number of complaints lodged<br />

profit and salaries/wages bill of<br />

Indian companies in lean period of<br />

business accounted for by private by customers against all banks in<br />

1999-2003, indicating both tend<br />

to move in tandem, in per cent :<br />

12&11<br />

and foreign banks : 30 2007-08, in lakhs : 11.8<br />

Number out of every 100 Ranks of 'credit card related issues'<br />

Average annual growth rate of net<br />

profit and salaries/wages bill of<br />

complaints lodged by bank among nature of customers'<br />

Indian companies in boom period customers in India that are against complaints : 1<br />

of 2003-08, in per cent : 28 & 21<br />

private and foreign banks : 93<br />

Courtesy : Business India


Bob MacKnight<br />

Lead Analyst, PFC Energy<br />

Non-OPEC Decline Rates<br />

Accelerate<br />

9<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

declining at a global average rate of 9.4% a year<br />

(6.58% including the FSU).<br />

In other words, not only were higher oil prices<br />

unable to arrest the drop in production, but the<br />

decline rates actually accelerated in recent years.<br />

The cumulative impact is that base oil production<br />

outside OPEC and the FSU (for fields online before<br />

2000) had declined by 40% between 2000 and<br />

2008. New supply, therefore, was merely<br />

offsetting drops in base production with most of<br />

Decline rates in non-OPEC countries have risen that offset coming from production rises in the FSU<br />

since 2002, despite the investment imperative of a – and even then, as decline rates kept rising, <strong>new</strong><br />

high price environment. By 2008, non-OPEC source was unable to offset declines leading to<br />

fields outside the FSU which were producing in negative production growth.<br />

2000 were declining at an average rate of 9.4% a<br />

year. The rate would be 6.6% if the FSU were<br />

Regional trends in decline rates<br />

included. The decline rate has been increasing<br />

steadily in the past five years, evidence of the • Europe shows the largest decline rates in the<br />

industry's inability to arrest decline in mature non-OPEC world, primarily as the result of the<br />

fields. Regional variations, however, are maturity of North Sea oil production. By<br />

important. In Europe decline rates for mature 2008, the decline rate for fields producing oil<br />

fields are in excess of 30%; in Asia Pacific rates are<br />

as low as 4%. And just as high oil prices were<br />

unable to reverse decline rates, it is unlikely that<br />

low oil prices will accelerate them: aggregate<br />

decline rates are driven by resource depletion.<br />

in 2000 was over 30%, double the decline rate<br />

in 2007. In fact, base production from these<br />

older fields in 2008 was just 32% of what it<br />

was in 2000 – a loss of approximately 3.5<br />

million b/d.<br />

Decline rates accelerate all over the non-<br />

OPEC world<br />

Decline rates in non-OPEC and non-FSU supply<br />

have risen steadily in recent years, despite high oil<br />

prices: fields that were online in 2000 have been<br />

declining at an average global rate of 6.2% a year<br />

in the period from 2000 to 2008. Even that<br />

number aggregates lower decline rates in 2000-<br />

2003 with rising decline rates thereafter. By<br />

2008, fields in non-OPEC countries and outside<br />

the FSU that were in production in 2000 were<br />

• Non-OPEC Middle East and North Africa<br />

(MENA) follows with decline rates for older<br />

fields in 2008 being 9%. By 2008, non-OPEC<br />

MENA fields were producing 40% less than in<br />

2000 reflecting across the board declines in<br />

Egypt, Syria, Oman, Tunisia, Yemen and<br />

Bahrain.<br />

• In non-OPEC West Africa decline rates were<br />

6.6% in 2008 with drops coming from Gabon,<br />

Congo and Cameroon. In total, the region's


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

mature fields produced 47% less in 2008 than industry recovered from the collapse in<br />

in 2000.<br />

Russian oil production following the<br />

disintegration of the Soviet Union. These<br />

• In Latin America the decline rate for older lower declines rates reflect in part the fact that<br />

fields was 6.3% with Mexico accounting for the Russian oil production refocused on producing<br />

majority of that (due to the steep declines at more from existing fields or from sections of<br />

Cantarell), although declines in Argentina are<br />

also contributing to the total. In sum, the<br />

fields previously undeveloped.<br />

region's pre-2000 fields produced 32% less in<br />

2008 than in 2000.<br />

• In the United States and Canada, the average<br />

decline rate for fields producing in 2000 was<br />

5.4%. The two countries' mature fields<br />

produced 33% less in 2008 than in 2000.<br />

• In the Asia-Pacific region, declines in 2008<br />

were 4.1% with drops coming from Indonesia,<br />

Australia, Vietnam, and Brunei. In total, the<br />

region's old fields produced 35% less in 2008<br />

than in 2000.<br />

• In the FSU and Eastern Europe, declines for<br />

older fields were lower, with the region<br />

producing more in 2008 than in 2000 as the<br />

Snippets<br />

Percentage of world's wind Average number of children Slowdown experienced in average<br />

turbines that are located in worldwide who are killed due to reaction time by persons making<br />

Germany and USA : 24 & 18 accidental injuries every day:2,000 hands-free mobile calls while<br />

10<br />

driving than those who were not, in<br />

Percentage of world's wind Percentage of global child-injury milliseconds : 212<br />

turbines that are located in India deaths caused by 'Fall' : 4.2<br />

Implications for future decline rates<br />

The inability to arrest decline rates over the <strong>last</strong><br />

few years demonstrates that higher oil prices,<br />

whatever the positive economic impact on <strong>new</strong><br />

projects or to the attractiveness of reworking older<br />

projects, were unable to reverse or even arrest<br />

growing decline rates around the world. In fact,<br />

decline rates seem to be uncorrelated with oil<br />

prices or technology at least on an aggregate<br />

level. Hence, the good <strong>new</strong>s is that the drop in oil<br />

prices does not fundamentally alter the decline<br />

rate in existing production; but the bad <strong>new</strong>s is<br />

that the decline is already very high, especially in<br />

certain basins, making the task of replacing that<br />

oil increasingly more burdensome.<br />

and China : 8 & 6 Percentage increased in error rate<br />

Percentage of global child-injury by those using hands-free mobile<br />

deaths caused by 'War' : 2.3 kit than those who were not : 83<br />

Courtesy : Business India


Rajiv Puri<br />

Associate Director, Advisory Services,<br />

Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd<br />

The world economies are witnessing turbulent<br />

times with global economic slowdown and<br />

recessionary trends. Virtually all geographies and<br />

industries are getting impacted due to lack of<br />

credit, declining asset valuations, defaults and<br />

volatility in commodity and currency markets.<br />

Globally, the oil & gas (O&G) industry is facing<br />

significant challenges & risks. A recent study done<br />

by Ernst & Young showed that key business drivers<br />

influencing risks faced by companies are macro<br />

threats emerging from general geopolitical and<br />

macro-economic environment; sector threats<br />

which emerge from trends that are reshaping the<br />

industry and operational threats which have<br />

become so intense that they may impact the<br />

strategic performance of leading firms.<br />

After spiraling over the <strong>last</strong> few years,<br />

international crude oil prices have declined from<br />

USD 147 per barrel to USD 40 per barrel. Pricing<br />

weakness and tightening of access to credit and<br />

capital are difficulties faced by many energy<br />

companies in the current economic situation. This<br />

has necessitated companies to revisit their<br />

investment decisions so that they could either<br />

scale back the investment or delay or shelve the<br />

planned investment in exploration projects.<br />

Additionally, the surge in the exploration cost for a<br />

project has put stress on investment and capital<br />

needs thus, impacting the return on investment.<br />

Although upstream spend by national oil<br />

companies (NOCs) and private players is not<br />

expected to decline drastically, for the smaller<br />

industry players – who are not well-capitalized<br />

and/or were previously relying on private equity<br />

firms and hedge funds for finances – the current<br />

scenario has become very risky. Indian upstream<br />

companies continue to cite high raw material,<br />

high service cost and tight rig market as key<br />

contributors to inflationary pressures and project<br />

delays.<br />

Risk Management in<br />

E&P<br />

11<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Bearing in mind the existing scenario, it is<br />

important for O&G companies to have a good<br />

understanding of the ways in which these<br />

challenges can be responded to. This would<br />

enable companies to efficiently manage risks,<br />

optimize performance and increase operational<br />

effectiveness. It is pertinent for O&G companies to<br />

have a robust and effective project risk<br />

management framework including policy,<br />

structure, process & monitoring procedures.<br />

Risk management is a process that identifies<br />

potential events, that may refrain an entity from<br />

achieving project objectives and prioritizes risk<br />

events based on its severity. Further it develops<br />

mitigation plans to manage identified projects<br />

risks within defined risk appetite and monitor<br />

these risks on periodic intervals to provide<br />

reasonable assurance regarding achievement of<br />

project objectives.<br />

It has to be understood that risk management is<br />

not just about avoiding risk. But, it is a process to<br />

identify risks inherent to a project and pro-actively<br />

address these to minimize loss and enhance<br />

stakeholder value. Effective risk management<br />

helps in avoiding surprises, ensuring better<br />

governance, facilitating effective decision making<br />

and enables operational efficiencies.<br />

Exploration and production (E&P) companies<br />

should proactively identify emerging project<br />

execution risks, mitigation strategies for<br />

managing risks and oversight systems in order to<br />

assess the current environment and accordingly<br />

adapt/modify the project execution plan. E&P<br />

projects are inherently dependant on local and<br />

global uncertainties; long gestation period and<br />

high capital cost with long payback period require<br />

assessment of downside risk of non-discoveries<br />

and variance in the envisaged product portfolio.<br />

The key to success of an exploration project is to<br />

have robust budgeting, forecasting, risk analysis<br />

and monitoring systems.<br />

E&P companies are exposed to project risks<br />

relating to identification of right geographical<br />

location & assets, identifying right exploration<br />

portfolio, selection of partner & alliances, realistic<br />

reserve analysis and access to capital & cost. The<br />

key to asset selection success is the “ability to<br />

predict” while conducting a comprehensive<br />

portfolio risk assessment exercise. For each


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

exploration project, a company should have a impairment and review fair value and hedge<br />

process to evaluate investment risks as part of its<br />

screening process – taking into account petroleum<br />

accounting guidance.<br />

potential, operating risks, operators' capability,<br />

clarity of profit sharing, contract adherence,<br />

political stability, geographical conditions and<br />

project types and sizes. These risk factors are<br />

The other risks that are inherent to the exploration<br />

projects are political risks of other countries,<br />

safety, security, health, environmental and<br />

taken into account in profitability analyses.<br />

12<br />

litigation risks. Key to effective risk management is<br />

to raise the efficiency of the project management<br />

processes including procurement, subsurface<br />

Exploration projects deal with petroleum reserves evaluation, investment decision-making and<br />

potentially lying kilometers beneath the surface of knowledge management.<br />

the earth, making it difficult to visualize and<br />

understand the petroleum geology at such depths.<br />

The board of directors should be involved at the<br />

Absolute geological confidence is therefore rare,<br />

appropriate time in evaluating risk and reward<br />

and considerable geological uncertainty prevails.<br />

trade-offs to have appropriate tone at the top and<br />

Still, the availability of sufficient data and detailed<br />

embed a risk management culture within the<br />

geological analyses could reduce this uncertainty<br />

organization.<br />

and exploration risks to acceptable levels. The key<br />

factors to be considered are likelihood of finding<br />

The guiding principles in implementing a risk<br />

traps and reservoirs and volume of petroleum<br />

management framework is to understand project<br />

generated, assessment of the sizes of resources or<br />

objectives and deliverables, focus on significant<br />

reserves in each target area, to control finding<br />

risks (risks that matter), evaluate current<br />

costs, (geophysical surveys and drilling) and raise<br />

drilling and exploration efficiency.<br />

competency to manage identified risks, enhance<br />

risk management competency by developing<br />

mitigation plans, define roles, responsibilities and<br />

At an operating level, exploration projects have accountability to manage risks and implement<br />

regulatory, technical, geological and geophysical monitoring and oversight structure.<br />

(G&G), engineering, environmental, health &<br />

safety (EHS), financial, production & marketing<br />

risks.<br />

Key components of any risk management process<br />

are: risk assessment to identify and prioritize risks;<br />

risk competence Scan to evaluate the<br />

The credit risks faced by exploration projects organization's current capability to manage its<br />

relates to key counterparties, lenders, vendors, risks; risk management enhancement for<br />

suppliers and partners. Adequacy of credit risk improvement in the overall level of risk<br />

management and reporting process has to be management competency by identifying the<br />

assessed along with credit and collection policies, initiatives to improve the risk mitigation<br />

approved counterparties, master netting capabilities, institutionalize policies and<br />

agreements and collateral requirements to procedures to establish risk governance<br />

manage credit risk and exposure. Impact of framework in the organization and monitoring<br />

current counterparty credit risk and related process to review the implementation status of<br />

concentrations of risk to derivative valuations and specific plans to address significant risks and<br />

disclosures should also be adequately assessed. <strong>final</strong>ly risk remediation to implement the<br />

initiatives identified to enhance the risk mitigation<br />

capabilities.<br />

From a financial risk perspective, companies<br />

should evaluate liquidity by stress testing cash<br />

flows, working capital needs and assess cash and In the present environment, robust and proactive<br />

cash equivalents for risk of loss and devaluation. project risk management procedures can assist<br />

Companies also have to manage exchange & E&P companies in managing their projects in a<br />

interest rate fluctuation risks and evaluate assets more effective manner in order to deliver on its<br />

such as investments, receivables and goodwill for operational and financial parameters.


Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee<br />

Group Leader – Process<br />

Lurgi India Company Pvt. Ltd.<br />

High Performance Trays in<br />

Distillation Operation<br />

13<br />

A conventional tray has three functional zones:<br />

1. Active area for mixing vapour and liquid<br />

2. Vapour space above the active area<br />

3. Downcomer between trays<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

A proper tray design involves balancing these<br />

three zones to achieve the desired objectives. The<br />

skill involved is in striking the best balance<br />

between the active and downcomer areas.<br />

For a greenfields plant, a well designed High performance trays function by improving<br />

conventional tray generally provides the best performance in one or more of the three<br />

solution for vapour-liquid contacting. However, functional zones.<br />

with the passage of time, increasing demand for<br />

throughput, has compelled operators to operate<br />

the column to a limit where conventional trays<br />

become a bottleneck.<br />

Limits of a Conventional Tray<br />

High Capacity Choices<br />

C r o s s - F l o w Tr a y s w i t h Tr u n c a t e d<br />

Downcomers<br />

The introduction of high performance trays have<br />

been one of the highlights of distillation processes Increasing the active bubbling area: A normal tray<br />

in the 1990s. They offer practical solutions for has an area under the entering downcomer and<br />

revamping processes to achieve higher capacities. over the exiting downcomer where liquid and<br />

High performance trays can increase throughput vapour cannot come into contact. Typically, the<br />

by 10 – 25% over a good conventional tray design. downcomer top area accounts for 15 – 25% of the<br />

column cross-section area, leaving as little as 50%<br />

for active bubbling area. This reduces the tray's<br />

Active Area<br />

Conventional Trays<br />

Smaller Active Area<br />

Active Area<br />

High Performance Trays<br />

Larger Active Area<br />

Figure 1 : Conventional Trays vs. High Performance Trays


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

vapour handling capacity significantly. The liquid flowrate. A swept-back weir (Figure 2)<br />

inactive area of a conventional tray is precisely achieves this on a conventional tray. Multi<br />

what such high performance trays attempt to downcomer tray also uses this approach.<br />

address. The downcomers are sloped from top However. its downcomer length is far longer than<br />

and truncated above the tray deck and the area<br />

under it can be as “true active area” for<br />

that of a conventional tray.<br />

fractionation. The capacity increase as a result, is In multidowncomer trays the flow path from inlet<br />

of the same order as the percentage gain in the to outlet is short. This reduces the tray efficiency.<br />

active area (refer Figure 1). The Superfrac trays by However, recent developments claim higher<br />

Koch-Glitsch and VG Plus trays by Sulzer<br />

Chemtech work on this principle.<br />

efficiencies for such trays. Multi downcomers have<br />

large total weir length. This, alongwith large<br />

downcomer areas provide high liquid handling<br />

In addition, such trays also combine the following<br />

facilities to achieve the best possible results.<br />

capability. Such trays can handle large liquid<br />

loads, particularly when the volumetric ratio<br />

Decreasing weir load : Increasing the length of<br />

the outlet weir cuts the weir load and weir crest,<br />

and consequently lowers tray pressure drop (refer<br />

Figure 2). This raises the tray capacity. The crest<br />

height over the weir is expressed by the following<br />

equation :<br />

between vapour and liquid rates is low.<br />

Multidowncomer trays can have tray spacings as<br />

low as 300 mm. This facilitates larger number of<br />

trays for a given column height. The MDTM trays<br />

offered by UOP and the Hi-Fi trays offered by<br />

Shell/Sulzer Chemtech work on this principle.<br />

0.67<br />

C H = 0.4 (L / W L)<br />

Downcomers, including truncated ones, reduce<br />

CH Crest height, inches of liquid<br />

the active area available. On alternative is to use<br />

L Liquid flow rate, gpm<br />

a tray without downcomers, i.e., the dual flow tray.<br />

WL Outlet weir length, inches<br />

Low Pressure Drop Valves : Low pressure drop<br />

Without downcomer, the liquid must go down<br />

valves lowers the liquid height in the downcomer.<br />

through the same hole through which the vapour<br />

So, more liquid can be fed into the downcomer,<br />

rises.<br />

increasing the liquid handling capacity.<br />

Such trays have the added advantage of higher<br />

efficiencies compared to conventional trays on<br />

account on a better tray deck design.<br />

Multi Downcomer Trays<br />

Standard Downcomer with Swept<br />

Back Weir<br />

Increasing the weir length through which a liquid<br />

flows decreases the pressure drop for a given<br />

Figure 2 : Types of Downcomers<br />

14<br />

Trays Without Downcomers<br />

Arc Downcomer<br />

In dual flow trays, the liquid and vapour should<br />

pass through the same hole at the same time.<br />

However, this is unlikely. Either vapour and liquid<br />

pass through separate holes at the same time, or<br />

the liquid and vapour flows in pulses at different<br />

times. In the latter case, most of the holes pass<br />

vapour while the liquid level builds up. Then,<br />

when the liquid reaches sufficient static height to<br />

overcome the vapour flow, most of the holes will


15<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

pass liquid. performance trays. This eliminated a liquid load<br />

Dual flow trays tend to have open areas as high as bottleneck in the top section of the column.<br />

25%. High hole areas reduce stable operating<br />

range of the tray. Dual flow trays have another Installing high performance trays allowed the top<br />

drawback – lower efficiencies. The path length of section of the column to handle 50% additional<br />

dual trays is essentially zero. This reduces liquid load compared to the previous maximum<br />

efficiencies by 30 – 40%. On the other load without deterioration of the column<br />

hand, dual flow trays have higher capacities than performance. With the <strong>new</strong> trays the columns<br />

conventional trays. have also shown improved separation efficiency,<br />

resulting in a 3 – 4% increase in NGL production.<br />

Various modifications have been made to improve<br />

the dual flow design. Prime among them are The combination of these two effects produced a<br />

Stone and Webster Ripple tray and Shell Turbogrid payback period, on the cost of the revamp, of less<br />

tray. These designs provide greater operating than 1 month. The <strong>new</strong> trays were installed on<br />

flexibility than the standard dual flow design. existing tray supports without additional internal<br />

High Performance Tray Applications<br />

High performance trays have been successfully<br />

used in many applications including ethylene<br />

plants. Notable among them are the Primary<br />

welding. Removal of the old trays and installation<br />

of 18 high performance trays for one column took<br />

10 days during a scheduled shutdown.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Fractionator, the Caustic Scrubber, Demathaniser, High performance trays can greatly increase<br />

HP Depropaniser, LP Depropaniser, Deethaniser, distillation tower capacity. However, they should<br />

C2 Splitter, C3 Splitter. be used with caution. While many plants have had<br />

successes, others have had repeated failures.<br />

At Saudi Aramco's Shedgum and Uthmaniyah gas Often, the difference between success and failure<br />

plants, six demethanizer columns were revamped is understanding the performance limits and<br />

by replacing conventional valve trays with high- compromises in advance.<br />

Lew Watts<br />

President & CEO, PFC Energy<br />

In the October-December, 2008 issue (Vol. 6, Issue 4) of the PetroFed journal the article on page<br />

12 on the subject 'Where to Cut in the Upstream? The Answers are not Obvious – the<br />

Implications are Major', carried the photograph of Mr. Lew Watts, President & CEO, PFC Energy<br />

who had contributed the article. Unfortunately, beneath the photograph the name mentioned<br />

was Evonne Tan, Associate Analyst, Upstream Competition Service, PFC Energy – Kuala<br />

Lumpur.<br />

Correction<br />

It may kindly be noted that the article had been contributed by Mr. Lew Watts and that the<br />

photograph published was of Mr. Lew Watts. The error is deeply regretted.<br />

- Editor


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Deepak Mahurkar<br />

Associate Director,<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Ltd.<br />

16<br />

but dried up, with several potential deals being<br />

cancelled and no <strong>new</strong> major deals announced.<br />

The increase in deal numbers was wholly<br />

attributable to upstream activity and smaller deals<br />

below US$0.5bn. In contrast, there were<br />

significant falls in the number of larger value deals<br />

and a big falling-off of very large deals. There<br />

were only two deals that topped the US$5bn mark<br />

in 2008 compared with ten such deals in 2007.<br />

Reserves acquisition, rather than acreage,<br />

“Indian companies, public and private, accounted for 94% of total 2008 upstream deal<br />

bought assets overseas more than they sold value. Companies continued to seek growth<br />

during the year, although the value and primarily through acquisition as opposed to<br />

number of deals failed to reflect the energy exploration as the oil price soared in the first half<br />

independence agenda. Within the domestic of the year. Purchases in relatively stable locations<br />

basins, some reserves changed hands during such as Australia and Canada featured strongly as<br />

the high oil price period early in the year companies looked to safe havens to secure<br />

2008, with the later part of the year going reserves to meet future energy demand.<br />

near dry.”<br />

Like the oil price, 2008 was a tale of ups and<br />

2008 was the "Tale of Two Halves," starting with a downs in deal numbers across different parts of<br />

fairly robust number of transactions for the first the world. Year on year deal numbers were up in<br />

half of the year, until commodity prices began a all territories with the exception of the dominant<br />

steep decline and deal activity slid alongside North American market and the Russian<br />

them. By the fourth quarter, deal activity had all Federation. The pace of deal-making everywhere,<br />

though, slowed during the year as financial and<br />

market conditions deteriorated.<br />

Figure 1 : Total Oil & Gas Deals by value and<br />

number of deals 2005-2008<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Deals Update 2008<br />

Deals follow the oil price over a cliff<br />

A slowing in O&G deal momentum, as measured<br />

by deal value, was evident from the start of 2008<br />

compared with 2007. Deal value reduced<br />

progressively throughout 2008 before following<br />

the oil price over a cliff in the <strong>final</strong> quarter as the<br />

financial crisis intensified and economic<br />

conditions deteriorated. Companies slammed on<br />

the brakes in the <strong>final</strong> quarter with total O&G deal<br />

value down 59% on 2007 levels and 72%<br />

compared with the <strong>final</strong> quarter high of 2006.<br />

Figure 2 : Size of deals, 2008 (year on year % change in parenthesis)


Big deals in retreat<br />

Gas grabs top spot<br />

17<br />

Deal target pencils sharpen<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Indeed, the rush to develop Australian coal bed<br />

methane gas assets for LNG export helped<br />

Even before the worsening of the economic catapult Australia's share of worldwide O&G deal<br />

climate and the oil price plunge, big deals were in value up tenfold. Upstream deal value in Australia<br />

retreat. There were only two deals that topped the multiplied, from US$1.7bn in 2007 to US$16.6bn<br />

US$5bn mark in 2008 compared with ten such in 2008.<br />

deals in 2007. The hiatus in big deals was<br />

especially marked in the oilfield services sector.<br />

The sector had been particularly dynamic in 2007<br />

with three US$5bn plus deals worth a total of The immediate outlook for O&G deal-making in<br />

US$31.4bn. In 2008, the number of deals the early part of 2009 is bleak. However, while<br />

remained high, but the complete disappearance deal activity in the first half of the year looks set to<br />

of US$5bn plus deals meant total deal value in the remain subdued, it is difficult to see stronger<br />

sector nearly halved. players remaining on the sidelines for the whole of<br />

2009 given the opportunities for acquisitions at<br />

low valuations. Many of the majors and national<br />

oil companies are in a strong position following a<br />

Six of the top ten 2008 O&G deals were purchases period of high oil prices. For companies from<br />

of gas assets. Five of the six were for countries such as China the current market offers<br />

'unconventional' resources that require unrivalled opportunities to gain access which, in<br />

considerable technological investment. All of other circumstances, would be denied to them.<br />

them were in Australia and North America Similarly, sovereign wealth funds and many<br />

reflecting the attraction of targets in stable private equity investors will be watching the sector<br />

locations close to end markets as companies closely.<br />

responded to security of supply constraints.<br />

Key Regional Markets<br />

North America<br />

The fall in North America O&G deal volume from number of big deals that really hit total value.<br />

its 2006 US$164.7bn high accelerated sharply in There were just 15 deals in 2008 worth US$1bn or<br />

2008. Total deal value fell 43%, from US$129.7bn above, for example, compared to 31 in 2007. This<br />

in 2007 to US$73.6bn in 2008. Deal numbers alone accounted for US$49.4bn of the total<br />

were down by 8% but it was a halving of the US$56bn year on year fall in total deal value.<br />

Figure 3 : North America oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

South America<br />

South America followed the trend elsewhere of share it did not own in Peregrino, a heavy oil field<br />

declining O&G deal value. Deal-making in 2008 in Brazil, and 25% of the deep water Kaskida<br />

tended to be concentrated in countries such as discovery in the Gulf of Mexico, from US company<br />

Brazil, Columbia and Chile which, unlike Anadarko Petroleum. The deal reflected intense<br />

countries such as Venezuela, are more open to interest in the growth of the upstream industry in<br />

modernisation and internationalisation. The Brazil but, also, stood out in a year when there was<br />

largest deal was Norwegian company less international activity in the region.<br />

StatoilHydro's US$2.1bn purchase of the half-


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Figure 4 : South America oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

Europe<br />

Oil and gas deal activity in Europe was relatively upstream and midstream value was up on the<br />

resilient compared to the big fall in volume back of a series of deals for North Sea assets and<br />

elsewhere. Deal numbers rose 64% from 77 to Enbridge's US$1.6bn sale of a 25% stake in its<br />

126 and total deal value was down 15% Spanish pipeline business, Compania Logistica de<br />

compared to a 38% drop worldwide. Indeed, Hidrocarburos.<br />

Figure 5 : Europe oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

Russia & CIS<br />

Deal activity was far more subdued in the Russian the region's O&G deal value was in the upstream<br />

Federation in 2008 with deal numbers down to 33 sector. This was significantly higher than the 62%<br />

from 41 the previous year. It was deal values, upstream share worldwide outside the region. The<br />

though, that saw the bigger drop, falling by remainder of Russian and CIS deal activity was<br />

around two thirds across all the main deal activity split evenly between the midstream and<br />

sectors. Not surprisingly, the vast majority, 82%, of downstream with only one service sector deal.<br />

Figure 6 : Russian Federation oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

18


Australia & Asia-Pacific<br />

19<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

2008 deal value in the Asia Pacific region shot up Asia Pacific O&G deal value rose from just 20% in<br />

by 73%, from US$13.2bn in 2007 to US$22.7bn in 2007 to 75% in 2008. The three largest deals,<br />

2008. The dramatic rise in deal volume was ConocoPhillips /Origin, BG Group/Queensland<br />

almost wholly driven by deals to acquire Gas Company and Petronas/Santos – together<br />

Australian gas assets. Australia's share of total accounted for US$10.8bn of deal value.<br />

Figure 7 : Asia Pacific (excluding Australia) oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

Figure 8 : Australia oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08<br />

International & Africa<br />

International activity, involving either apace ahead of the oil price drop. There was an<br />

international groups of investors or assets that are increase in African deal value headed by<br />

spread across territories, remained lively in 2008. GEPetrol's US$2.2bn purchase of Devon Energy's<br />

Deal numbers edged up from 71 in 2007 to 79 in oil and gas business in Equatorial Guinea. Italian<br />

2008 although, as elsewhere, none of the deals oil and gas company Eni added to its already<br />

compared with the largest 2007 deals. Forty nine substantial oil and gas operations in Africa,<br />

of the 71 international deals were in the oilfield expanding its operations in Algeria in a US$995<br />

services sector where consolidation continued million purchase of First Calgary.<br />

Figure 9 : International oil and gas deals by sector 2007-08


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Project Management is not Merely<br />

for Project Managers<br />

Raj Kalady<br />

Managing Director, PMI India<br />

20<br />

structured approach to doing things combined<br />

with sensitization to risk, improved risk<br />

management, communication and time<br />

management. I would like to illustrate this by<br />

referring to the Project Management Body of<br />

Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), a project<br />

management guide from the Project Management<br />

Institute, and an internationally recognized<br />

standard, that provides the fundamentals of<br />

project management as they apply to a wide<br />

range of projects.<br />

The role of a Project Manager, especially in<br />

large/traditional industries like oil/petroleum is The PMBOK® Guide recognizes 42 processes that<br />

often a tenured role with job rotation ensuring fall into five basic process groups and nine<br />

that employees move on to different roles. In such knowledge areas that are typical of almost all<br />

cases how does the organization justify the projects. It is to these knowledge areas that I<br />

investments in training and certification of project would like to draw attention. The nine knowledge<br />

managers? areas are: Project Time Management, Project Cost<br />

Management, Project Quality Management,<br />

The answer is straightforward – the tenets, Project Human Resource Management, Project<br />

principles and practices of PM are easily Communications Management, Project<br />

extendable and applicable to other fields of Integration Management, Project Scope<br />

general management. For instance, if you Management, Project Risk Management, and<br />

examine some of the knowledge areas espoused Project Procurement Management.<br />

by PM – like HR, communication, time<br />

management etc you would see that they have Of the nine knowledge areas it is apparent that<br />

universal impact and would hold good for any the first five focusing on time, cost, quality, HR and<br />

function/initiative/ programme or project that the communication have a universal impact on all<br />

organization is running. facets of general management. Skills in these<br />

areas contribute to the success of a manager<br />

In fact, I would go a step further to vouch for the across any function in an organization. At the<br />

relevance and importance of PM in all facets of life same time the remaining four knowledge areas,<br />

– both personal and professional. The moment while not having a direct impact on management<br />

you have time, people, money and resources to efficiency, do contribute indirectly to effective<br />

juggle you have a project on hand – and good management. A clear case for the relevance and<br />

project management techniques can ensure the need for PM in any business that needs to run and<br />

success of the project. In fact an acquaintance of monitor multiple projects.<br />

mine recently created a work breakdown structure<br />

to successfully plan, manage and execute his Let's delve a little further – and look at the<br />

daughter's wedding! knowledge areas to gain perspective on how they<br />

can impact general management functions in an<br />

Getting back to the business context, let's look at it organization.<br />

from another perspective. Project managers<br />

appreciate and understand the importance of • Project Integration Management spans the<br />

leadership – a trait that has become even more processes and activities needed to identify,<br />

critical in the business environment of the day. define, combine, unify, and coordinate the<br />

Leadership at all levels has become a crucial various processes and project management<br />

business need to differentiate the leaders from the activities within the Project Management<br />

followers, the winners from the followers – and PM process groups. It entails many choices about<br />

delivers on this. resource allocation, making trade-offs among<br />

completing objectives and alternatives, and<br />

The all-pervasive impact of PM stems from the managing the interdependencies among the<br />

basic pedestal that it is built on – namely a project management knowledge areas.


21<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

• Project Scope Management shows the distribution, storage, retrieval, and ultimate<br />

processes involved in ensuring the project disposition of project information. Effective<br />

includes all the work required, and only the communication creates a bridge between<br />

work required, for completing the project diverse stakeholders, connecting various<br />

successfully. Managing the project scope is cultural and organizational backgrounds,<br />

primarily concerned with defining and different levels of expertise, and various<br />

controlling what is and what is not included in perspectives and interests in the project<br />

the project. Here the focus is on the goal or execution or outcome. Here the manager<br />

target and the motivation to achieve the same learns to communicate effectively and<br />

is high – a skill that is extremely critical across efficiently and to leverage tools and processes<br />

functions and businesses today. to accomplish the same.<br />

• Project Time Management focuses on the • Project Risk Management covers the processes<br />

processes that are used to help ensure the related to identifying, analyzing, and<br />

timely completion of the project. In essence controlling risks for the project. Effective<br />

this helps build effective time management – Project Risk Management increases the<br />

again a crucial trait in the repertoire of probability and impact of positive events, and<br />

managerial skills. decreases the probability and impact of<br />

negative events. The process of identifying,<br />

• Project Cost Management covers the analyzing and mitigating risks becomes a<br />

processes involved in planning, estimating, habit – a surefire formula for success for any<br />

budgeting, and controlling costs so that the manager – often times it is the lack of such<br />

project can be completed within the approved foresight that leads to the failure of initiatives,<br />

budget. In the current economic and business<br />

environment the ability to understand, • Pr o j e c t Pr o c u r e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t<br />

evaluate and manage costs is an important encompasses the processes necessary to<br />

quality – that will stand the test of time. purchase or acquire products, services, or<br />

results needed from outside the project team.<br />

• Project Quality Management spans the It covers contract management and change<br />

processes and activities that determine quality control processes required to develop and<br />

policies, objectives, and responsibilities so administer contracts or purchase orders<br />

that the project meets its goals. It implements issued by authorized project team members. It<br />

the quality management system through also includes administering any contract<br />

policy and procedures with continuous issued by an outside organization (the buyer)<br />

process improvement activities conducted that is acquiring the project from the<br />

throughout, as appropriate. This instills an performing organization (the seller), and<br />

understanding of quality (which is a base administering contractual obligations placed<br />

criterion to do business in today's global on the project team by the contract.<br />

marketplace) in your managerial cadre.<br />

It is clear that training in project management and<br />

• Project Human Resource Management a certified assessment of PM capabilities stands<br />

describes the processes involved in the both the organization and the employee in good<br />

planning, acquisition, development, and stead. It arms the employee with the project<br />

management of the project team. An management skills and best practices required to<br />

important management skill that hones team handle any task/project across functions in an<br />

management including identifying team organization. For the employer a PM certified<br />

players, assigning and managing their roles professional is an asset – given the structured<br />

to meet common goals – irrespective of approach and 360 degree view that the<br />

project, business or function. professional brings to the table. Rather than<br />

becoming an investment that needs justification<br />

• Project Communications Management PM certification becomes a necessity in the current<br />

includes processes required to ensure timely business environment where resources and<br />

and appropriate generation, collection, money are scarce.


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Prof. Hamid Ali<br />

Director of Petroleum Studies,<br />

Aligarh Muslim University<br />

An Energy Saving Option in<br />

Process Industry<br />

Energy resources will continue to play an<br />

important role in India's future, being a major<br />

growing economy and having large boundaries.<br />

However it is heavily dependent upon imported<br />

crude oil for its energy requirements affecting its<br />

balance of payment adversely. The majority of<br />

India's population is still living in rural areas and<br />

has no access to modern forms of energy which is<br />

central to economic development. Thus there is a<br />

need to examine other alternatives.<br />

One option is to conserve energy by replacing and<br />

installing energy efficient equipments which<br />

should be cheap and require little or no<br />

maintenance as energy saved is, energy<br />

Table - 1 Process Reboiler<br />

name/column<br />

Alkylation Sulfuric Depropanizer<br />

Desiobutanizer<br />

Alkylation (HY) Acid Rerum<br />

Depropanizer<br />

Acid Stripper<br />

Deisobutanizer<br />

Debutanizer<br />

Catalytic Reformer Stabilizer<br />

Aromatic Recovery Stripper<br />

Pre-extractor<br />

Gas Plant Stabilizer<br />

Stripper<br />

De-ethanizer/<br />

Absorber Stripper<br />

Debutanizer<br />

Rerun (naptha splitter)<br />

Depropanizer<br />

Depentanizer<br />

Stabilizer<br />

Sulfur<br />

Sour water stripper<br />

Recovery<br />

Amine regeneration<br />

Miscellaneous Vaporizer<br />

Splitter<br />

22<br />

generated. In view of these aspects, Vertical Tube<br />

Thermosiphon Reboilers have proven to be highly<br />

effective and efficient equipment in heating as<br />

well as cooling circuits for multiple applications of<br />

all the reboiler types. Vertical tube thermosiphon<br />

reboilers are most widely used in petroleum<br />

refining, natural gas, petrochemical and chemical<br />

processing industries where significant capital<br />

investment is represented by vaporizers,<br />

evaporators and reboilers due to a number of<br />

advantages over the other types. In these<br />

industries about 60% of their total operating costs<br />

are represented by these systems.<br />

What is a Thermosiphon?<br />

Thermosiphon reboiler is essentially a closed loop<br />

circulation system where movement of fluid takes<br />

place due to the density difference of liquid and<br />

two-phase mixture in cold and hot legs<br />

respectively. Thermosiphon boiling of liquids in<br />

vertical tubes also play a decisive role in power<br />

plants and nuclear reactors and offers a potential<br />

means of storage and transportation of solar<br />

energy. The vertical tube thermosiphon reboilers<br />

(recirculating type) when designed and operated<br />

properly provide an efficient and economical<br />

Purpose<br />

Remove and collect from alkylate system<br />

Recycle acid stream to remove contaminants<br />

Remove and collect propane from alkylate stream<br />

Remove acid from propane stream<br />

Produce low vapor pressure alkylate gasoline<br />

Remove and collect butane from deisobutanizer stream<br />

Remove butane and lighter hydrocarbons from reformer stream<br />

Remove and collect aromatics from solvent hydrocarbon stream<br />

Remove butane and lighter hydrocarbons from reformate charge<br />

Remove water from solvent<br />

Remove and collect benzene from aromatics stream<br />

Remove and collect toluene from aromatics stream<br />

Remove and collect xylene from aromatics stream<br />

Remove butanes and lighter hydrocarbons from gasoline product<br />

Remove very light hydrocarbons such as methane and ethane<br />

Produce low -vapor pressure alkylate gasoline Stabilize gasoline<br />

component<br />

Recycle to polish lean oil (solvent) of lighter gasoline fraction<br />

Remove and collect propane<br />

Remove butane and lighter hydrocarbons from gasoline stream<br />

Remove butane and lighter hydrocarbons from gasoline stream<br />

Remove and collect H2S and NH3 from water stream<br />

Regenerate amine for recycle<br />

Normally found in fuel system to remove butanes<br />

Separation of two or more hydrocarbon fractions by distillation


23<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

means of excellent heat transfer rates, short receives the heat from the heat flux supplied and<br />

residence times of liquids in the reboiler tube its temperature rises as it moves upward. When<br />

which minimizes the risk of thermal degradation, vaporization takes place in the tubes, the specific<br />

most compact dimensions, simple in construction, volume of the fluid is increased resulting in its<br />

low manufacturing cost, easy to support, ease of upward movement while the liquid is siphoned<br />

cleaning and maintenance and since the reboiler from the adjoining cold leg. Depending upon the<br />

can be set close to the column, the frictional losses heat flux applied the flow regimes which may<br />

in the inlet and outlet piping and cost of vapor occur in boiling two-phase flow is out lined in<br />

lines are minimized. Thus this reboiler type is very Figure 2. Thus the heat transfer to the liquid<br />

reliable, has far lower operating costs than other reboiler tube generates a changing two-phase<br />

reboiler and can be used in a wide range of flow with various flow regimes spread along the<br />

operating pressures and temperatures. However tube length depending upon wall heat flux, inlet<br />

in the design of thermosiphon reboilers, special liquid temperature, liquid level in the column and<br />

care for low pressure drop has to be taken as the physical properties of the fluids. The heat transfer<br />

circulation is due to the density difference of liquid and hydrodynamics interact with each other in the<br />

& two-phase mixture. Some important thermosiphon reboiler under the influence of<br />

applications of reboilers found in a typical various governing operating parameters. The<br />

petroleum processing units have been point at which two-phase flow begins is known as<br />

summarized by Huchler as given in Table – 1. incipient point of boiling (IPB). The IPB divides the<br />

tubes into two distinct regions with significantly<br />

In a process industry, the equipment is generally a different modes and heat transfer coefficients.<br />

1 – 1 exchanger placed vertically, with upper tube Non-boiling single phase (convection dominated<br />

sheet close to the liquid of the bottoms in the sub-cooled boiling with low heat transfer<br />

column as shown in Figure 1. The process fluid coefficient) and boiling (fully developed saturated<br />

entering the vertical tubes of heat exchanger boiling with very high value of heat transfer


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

coefficient). Therefore prediction of boiling nuclear boiling diminishes resulting in its<br />

incipience heat transfer and circulation rates are decreasing the overall of heat transfer<br />

the primary requirements for the design and coefficient as the film coefficient is greater in<br />

efficient operation of the thermosiphon reboiler.<br />

Vertical tube thermosiphon reboiler is generally<br />

the nucleate boiling.<br />

operated either as heat transfer equipment or as a (v) The lower tower pressure results in a lower<br />

separation system. When the thermosiphon percent vaporization, therefore, for pressure<br />

reboiler is operated as the heat transfer unit, it less than 5.0 psig, 15% may be the highest<br />

generates the vapour phase for counter current<br />

two-phase vapour-liquid flow required for<br />

vaporization for a thermosiphon reboiler.<br />

components separation in a rectification or (vi) The vertical tube length is usually 2.5 to 5.0 m<br />

stripping column. Performance specification for (8 to 16 ft), although lengths upto 6.0 meter<br />

the reboiler is given by a heat duty and (20 ft is quite common). Longer tubes are<br />

optimization aims to increase the overall heat possible, but the whole distillation column<br />

transfer coefficient and/or reduce the driving would have to be raised to accommodate<br />

temperature difference. However when them. Tube length less than about 1.8 meter<br />

thermosiphon reboiler is operated as separation (6 ft.) leads to uneconomical designs.<br />

unit, it will be specified through a concentration of<br />

volatile product in the concentrate. Typical (vii) The outlet nozzle of the reboiler and the return<br />

applications are: water– ethylene glycol, acetone- pipe to the distillation column may be<br />

water, ethanol-water etc.<br />

designed in a number of ways, however, the<br />

side – outlet type is the simplest and the most<br />

While considering a vertical tube thermosiphon commonly used. Generally the flow area in<br />

reboiler for a duty, following guidelines must be the outlet nozzle is equal to that in the tubes to<br />

strictly observed:<br />

avoid instability. The inlet nozzle may enter<br />

the lower header at the bottom or side,<br />

(i) Most commonly the thermosiphon reboiler is whichever is most convenient depending<br />

operated/designed in the region of slug flow. upon the header type and ground clearance.<br />

As the two-phase move in the upward The diameter of the inlet nozzle and pipe work<br />

direction the percent vapor flow increases and is less than that of the outlet nozzle, as it is only<br />

the flow type becomes an annular or mist flow. required to carry single phase liquid and a<br />

The mist flow pattern decreases the value of high pressure drop here will usually improve<br />

heat transfer coefficient considerably. The<br />

percent vaporization therefore should not be<br />

the stability of the unit.<br />

more than about 30% by weight.<br />

(viii)For low pressure operation (less than 0.2 bar)<br />

the problem is of achieving steady nucleate<br />

(ii) The viscosity of the feed should be less than boiling because of the relatively large volume<br />

approximately 0.50 cp otherwise the flow of vapour produced by a small amount of<br />

difficulty may occur.<br />

vaporization. At low pressure the sensible<br />

heat duty is large and this can lead to a low<br />

(iii) The tower level for the thermosiphon reboiler average heat transfer coefficient. High<br />

(natural circulation) should be great enough pressure operation is made difficult because it<br />

to overcome the pressure drop to inlet flow is easy to exceed the critical heat flux and<br />

line, exchanger and return line. Hence the phase density differences that drives the<br />

unit should be designed considering a large<br />

liquid level for safety. For natural circulation,<br />

circulation is small.<br />

vertical exchanger is to set the top of the tube (ix) Vertical tube thermosiphon reboiler performs<br />

at the lowest design liquid level as too high a more efficiently at the liquid submergence<br />

level may be detrimental to the exchanger level of 50 to 75%. Though the value of heat<br />

operation.<br />

transfer coefficient was very high for some<br />

systems whose viscosities were less, when the<br />

(iv) The IPB has clearly indicated the two distinct submergence level was maintained at 30%.<br />

regions which depend strongly on the liquid The performance of reboiler got adversely<br />

head. When the level head increases for affected for system having high viscosity like<br />

vertical exchangers, the liquid head forces ethylene glycol as the flow became very low<br />

liquid to higher levels in the tubes. Thus and intermittent. Thus it is recommended that<br />

convective transfer is predominant and while considering vertical tube thermosiphon<br />

24


25<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

reboiler for any operation the viscosity of the entering into the reboiler.<br />

feed should be less then approximately 0.5 cp.<br />

Note: The article contains information from the open literature<br />

and the work carried out by the author on a number of organic<br />

(x) The development of oscillations is higher at<br />

liquids and their binary mixtures.<br />

low liquid submergence and more with<br />

organic liquids than water therefore a valve<br />

must be incorporated in the pipeline before<br />

Obituary<br />

He was an independent consultant for the past<br />

15 years rendering service to institutes,<br />

corporates and Government in India and<br />

aborad. He also found time in between to<br />

deliver lectures. He prepared a policy paper<br />

on India's Road to Hydrogen Economy for the<br />

Indian National Academy of Engineering along<br />

with Dr. T. K. Roy in 2006 and delivered the<br />

Dr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay<br />

keynote address in use and supply of hydrogen<br />

in petroleum refining, petrochemicals and<br />

After over 50 years of dedicated contribution to<br />

fertilizers at the Lovraj Kumar Memorial Trust<br />

the oil & gas industry, the brilliant chemical<br />

workshop.<br />

engineer Dr. Pranab Kumar Mukhopadhyay,<br />

74, passed away on March 15, 2009 after a<br />

brief illness. He is survived by his wife and two He was a recipient of the Lala Shriram National<br />

daughters.<br />

Award for Leadership in Chemical Industry by<br />

the Indian Institute of Chemical Engineers and<br />

the NRDC Award for Invention of Solvent<br />

A gold medalist in chemical engineering from<br />

Extraction Process for production of pure<br />

Jadavpur University and Ph.D. in Technology<br />

aromatics. He was a Fellow of the Indian<br />

from Gubkin Petroleum Institute, Moscow, his<br />

Institute of Chemical Engineers and the Indian<br />

five decade professional experience covered<br />

National Academy of Engineering.<br />

technical service, teaching, R&D, consultancy<br />

and working in close association with research<br />

& academic institutes, operating companies Dr. Mukhopadhyay had been a key speaker at<br />

and commercialising a number of processes prestigious conferences and seminars. His <strong>last</strong><br />

and products. With 30 publications and 50 lecture, probably, was on the PetroFed platform<br />

papers presented in various national and to invitees on Energy Saving in Pumps, Fans<br />

international fora, Dr. Mukhopadhyay was a and Compressors on December 30, 2008.<br />

recipient of the Petrotech 2005 Life-time<br />

Achievement Award. Our heartfelt condolences to the bereaved<br />

family.<br />

Beginning his career with the Stanvac Refinery<br />

(now HPCL Refinery) at Mumbai in 1955 he<br />

later taught chemical engineering at IIT, Delhi<br />

before heading the R&D of Engineers India<br />

Limited for 13 years. In 1983 he became the<br />

first full time Director on the Board for R&D at<br />

IndianOil. He also served IndianOil as its<br />

Chairman.


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

In the long term interest of the Indian economy, the principle rule and allow the prices to be regulated<br />

Petroleum Federation of India circulated this by competition so that consumers are not<br />

thought leadership paper on January 15, 2009 burdened unduly.<br />

during the Petrotech-2009 international oil & gas<br />

conference & exhibition advocating market The good times have arrived – crude oil prices<br />

determined prices for petroleum products for have plummeted and reached a four year low.<br />

healthy growth of the industry. Private oil companies have begun to restart the<br />

retail operations they had closed down. Most<br />

- Editor importantly, soon there would be a <strong>new</strong>ly elected<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Strike when the Iron Is Hot…<br />

A Thought Leadership Paper by Petrofed<br />

26<br />

government at the centre with a fresh mandate<br />

from the public. It may not be compelled to take<br />

populist decisions. Election manifestos will be<br />

Over the past four years and till few months back, drafted soon; the petroleum sector and the<br />

high crude prices caused mayhem. Economies stakeholders would like political parties to spell<br />

were threatened and oil importing countries had out their plans on petroleum product pricing<br />

serious cause for worry when Big Oil and oil policy.<br />

exporting countries were rejoicing. At home,<br />

public oil marketing companies reported losses The Integrated Energy Policy also advocates<br />

even in the third quarter and some are expected to rationalisation of fuel prices. The policy<br />

return losses for the fiscal on account of controlled recommends that, as a general rule, all<br />

transport fuel prices, a paradox of purpose when commercial primary energy sources must be<br />

world-wide profits of oil majors have jumped priced at trade parity prices at the point of sale,<br />

several fold. The companies had borne very high namely the Free-on-Board (FOB) price for<br />

levels of under-recoveries, and now need to products for which the country is a net exporter<br />

regain their financial strength by avoiding making and Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) price for<br />

any losses during higher crude prices scenario in which it is a net importer. The policy projects that<br />

future. The future of marketing companies is at the price of a product for which the country is self<br />

stake. sufficient in a competitive market with many<br />

suppliers and buyers would fluctuate between the<br />

At the national level, oil bonds, fertilizer bonds two depending upon the ease of import/ export<br />

and subsidies in the two sectors weakened the and reliability of supplies. This principle, the<br />

Government finances. Trade and fiscal balances policy claims, is extremely relevant for the<br />

have been affected severely with high crude prices petroleum sector wherein bulk of the crude oil is<br />

in the past four years. imported and India has become a net exporter of<br />

petroleum products.<br />

The consumers will continue to be burdened in<br />

such scenarios if true competition does not set-in The policy goes further to recommend to cushion<br />

within the Indian retail petroleum sector. domestic prices against short-term volatility of<br />

prices on the international market (FOB or CIF)<br />

Steps to reduce transport fuel price on December domestic prices by setting on the basis of median<br />

6th and the temptation to further reduce them, prices over the previous month or a three month<br />

although may appear rational in the current low period. In conclusion the policy suggests that<br />

crude oil price scenario, are devoid of a <strong>last</strong>ing instead of administering prices, full price<br />

solution. competition should be introduced.<br />

Commodity markets are cyclic. Petroleum industry To start, decontrolling the prices by linking them to<br />

is no exception to this. Crude prices may go up in Trade Parity Price for all – PSU as well as Private Oil<br />

the future and difficult times would start again. Marketing companies – and providing subsidy to<br />

Political compulsions will never allow the burdens needy at the consumer end, would be in line with<br />

to be passed on deliberately. The debate over recommendation of the IEP 2006 which was<br />

how much to pay oil companies to make up for recently approved by the Union Cabinet.<br />

under-recoveries would never end, and as a result<br />

oil companies would stand to lose. Why not allow For the fear of consumers getting unduly<br />

competition to rule? Let the 'consumer pays' burdened disallowing the above actions would be


27<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

a script for failure on many accounts; failures we • Decontrol transport fuel prices, and<br />

were saved just when situation was getting out of<br />

control. That was owing to global drop in crude oil<br />

price, not our action. Hence, let the failures not<br />

• Let deserving domestic consumers receive<br />

subsidies instead of suppliers.<br />

wait round the corner.<br />

In case a similar very high crude price scenario<br />

Do not wait. Strike while the iron is hot ……<br />

emerges again, the Government can, as an<br />

exception and not as a rule, cap the burden on<br />

Here is an opportunity to take actions which, in all<br />

probability, find the solution to almost all related<br />

consumer and share the rest through fiscal or<br />

subsidy mechanism in future.<br />

problems –<br />

Let the opportunity not go waste.<br />

($/bbl)<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Apri l<br />

Absorbing Volatility in Crude Oil Prices not Planned<br />

Crude oil prices have displayed extreme volatility posed by the actual operation of the domestic<br />

in the <strong>last</strong> four years with NYMEX crude oil prices pricing policy of petroleum products, besides<br />

climbing from $37/bbl in April 2004 to $147/bbl making the domestic economy more vulnerable to<br />

in July 2008 and then tumbling to below $60/bbl oil price shocks due to higher degree of oil import<br />

mark within a span of three months. The average dependence. Despite the dismantling of the APM<br />

price of an Indian basket of crude oil has exhibited regime, the Public Sector Oil Marketing<br />

a whopping increase of 309 percent between April Companies (OMCs) have not yet been granted<br />

2004 and July 2008. This upward surge in crude freedom to revise the prices of the major<br />

oil prices reversed with the prices falling to petroleum products such as petrol, diesel,<br />

$55/bbl in November 2008. kerosene and LPG, which account for more than<br />

60 per cent of the total consumption of petroleum<br />

The erratic movement in global crude oil prices products, in tandem with international crude oil<br />

cannot be explained merely by the dynamics of price movements.<br />

demand and supply. Other variables such as<br />

currency movement, speculations, sufficiency and While average price of Indian basket of crude oil<br />

security, geopolitical tension and even the macro- increased by 309 percent between April 2004 and<br />

economic situation in countries like USA also July 2008, the retail selling prices of diesel were<br />

contribute to international crude oil price increased by only 60 percent and that of gasoline<br />

movement. It is therefore best to plan for volatility by 50 percent for the corresponding period,<br />

in prices, rather than be reticent about low prices. resulting in a low degree of price pass-through.<br />

The price pass-through ratios for gasoline and<br />

As India imports more than 70 percent of its crude diesel for the period between 2004 and July 2008<br />

oil requirement, these cyclic movements in were 0.16 and 0.19 respectively. This clearly<br />

international oil prices bring to the fore challenges indicates that decontrolling prices of petroleum<br />

Figure 1: Trends in Monthly International prices of Indian basket of crude oil<br />

May<br />

Trends in Monthly International prices of Indian Basket of crude oil<br />

June<br />

July<br />

August<br />

September<br />

October November December Source: PPAC-Oil Prices and Taxes, GoI (2008)<br />

y<br />

Januar<br />

February<br />

March FY 2009<br />

FY 2008<br />

FY2007<br />

FY 2006<br />

FY 2005


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

products, which was the Government intent while share holders would need to continue to share<br />

dismantling the APM regime in 2002, is not being their windfall profits with downstream companies<br />

implemented in principle. and consumers of products other than diesel,<br />

(per cent)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Figure 2: Percentage change in crude oil price vis-à-vis percentage change in domestic<br />

retail selling prices of Petrol and Diesel (2004-08)<br />

Percentage in crude oil price vis-à-vis percentage change in domestic retail selling prices of Petrol and Diesel<br />

50<br />

Impact of domestic petroleum product<br />

pricing policy on various stakeholders<br />

Not aligning the domestic selling prices of<br />

petroleum products with the international prices<br />

has adverse implications for government finances<br />

60<br />

Retail Selling Price Petrol Retail Selling Price Diesel Average price Indian basket<br />

crude oil<br />

28<br />

petrol, LPG and kerosene would continue to crosssubsidise<br />

these products.<br />

Impact on Private Sector Oil Marketing<br />

Companies<br />

and development of the petroleum sector. The As crude oil prices rose sharply in 2008, private<br />

financial health of the public sector oil marketing companies like Reliance Industries Limited closed<br />

companies would deteriorate; on one hand the down their retail outlets. They found it difficult to<br />

subsidy burden of the Government would grow compete with public sector oil marketing<br />

substantially, while the growth in revenue companies due to the selling price-differentials<br />

accruing to it from tax collections would slow down between public and private sector retail players.<br />

with tax rates being moderated. In such a The public sector oil marketing companies - Indian<br />

scenario, public upstream companies and their Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation,<br />

309<br />

Source: PPAC-Oil Prices and Taxes, GoI (2008); Indian Oil<br />

Thursday, April 24, 2008<br />

PIB RELEASE<br />

Closing of petrol pumps by private sector companies<br />

Lok Sabha<br />

Percentage increase (April 2004- July 2008)<br />

Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) has informed that the sales at their retail outlets (ROs) are negligible<br />

due to selling price differential between private and public sector ROs, leading to the closure of their<br />

ROs. Essar Oil Limited (EOL) and Shell India Marketing Private Limited (SIMPL) have not yet decided to<br />

shutdown their ROs.<br />

The prices of sensitive petroleum products are fixed by the Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies<br />

(OMCs) in consultation with the Government. Private oil companies are not subject to pricing<br />

restrictions by the Government and are free to take their pricing decisions on commercial<br />

considerations.<br />

The above information given by the Minister of State for Petroleum & Natural Gas Shri Dinsha Patel in<br />

a written reply in the Lok Sabha today.<br />

RCJ/l


29<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation are selling pricing of petroleum products as a result of which<br />

fuel below the production cost. While these state- the public sector Oil Marketing Companies end up<br />

owned oil retailing companies are compensated selling products at prices dictated by the<br />

by the Government for their revenue losses, a government which are lower than the import<br />

similar mechanism is not available to private parity price has resulted in huge under-recoveries<br />

sector players. This ad-hoc price control policy has for the OMCs (Figure 3). The magnitude of undercreated<br />

a non-level playing field between the recoveries of the Oil Marketing Companies on<br />

public and private sector. petrol, diesel, kerosene and LPG till November<br />

Figure 3: Under-recoveries of Oil Marketing Companies<br />

Some of the private fuel retailers, that had shut 2008 was Rs.1,50,000 crore of which the undertheir<br />

retail outlets following a sharp increase in recovery on diesel alone was reported to be<br />

crude oil price, intend restarting their operations approximately Rs.1,00,000 crore.<br />

with crude oil prices declining by about one-third<br />

between July-November 2008. The Central Government's share of meeting the<br />

Impact on Public Sector Oil Marketing<br />

Companies<br />

Under-recoveries of Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies<br />

Source: PPAC-Oil Prices and Taxes, GoI (2008)<br />

under-recoveries of Oil Marketing Companies<br />

through provision of budgetary subsidies on PDS<br />

kerosene and domestic LPG and the issue of oil<br />

bonds was 45.76 percent in 2007-08. Another<br />

The Government's influence over the retail selling 33.33 percent came from upstream companies<br />

(Year)<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

80000<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

0<br />

20146<br />

40000<br />

49387<br />

77123<br />

48817<br />

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 April-June 2008<br />

(Prov.)<br />

(Year)<br />

Figure 4: Profit before tax of Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies<br />

2008-09 (April-September)<br />

2007-08 (April-September)<br />

Source: Company Annual Reports<br />

Profits of Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies<br />

2007-08<br />

2006-07<br />

2005-06<br />

2004-05<br />

-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 15000<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

Diesel<br />

PDS Kerosene<br />

Domestic LPG<br />

Petrol<br />

Total<br />

BPCL<br />

HPCL<br />

IOCL


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

like ONGC, GAIL and OIL. The remaining losses investment sentiment and this could lead to a very<br />

on account of under-recoveries were borne by the negative situation for a growing economy like<br />

OMCs themselves 20.9 percent. India.<br />

The financial performance of the Public Sector When viewed in retrospect, the picture could have<br />

OMCs is very telling. The three OMCs (IOCL, been really dismal for the OMCs had it not been<br />

HPCL and BPCL) taken together have posted for the external financial assistance extended to<br />

aggregate pre-tax losses of Rs.11,870.14 crore them by the Centre and the E&P companies. The<br />

during the period April-September 2008 for the OMCs would actually have posted huge losses or<br />

financial year 2008-09 as against profits before record lower profits in <strong>last</strong> four years as a result of<br />

tax of Rs.10,624.12 crore for the corresponding single-handedly shouldering the financial burden<br />

period during the <strong>last</strong> fiscal (Figure 4). As a result, of unprecedented increase in under-recoveries<br />

downstream marketing companies will face (Figure 5).<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

severe liquidity crunch and encounter problems in<br />

meeting their day-to-day expenditure due and<br />

severely impact the investment plans. A weakened<br />

petroleum sector would lead to dampening of<br />

(USD million)<br />

-5000<br />

-10000<br />

-15000<br />

-20000<br />

-25000<br />

50000<br />

45000<br />

40000<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

Figure 5: Cash profits / losses of Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies<br />

in absence of any external financial assistance<br />

Cash Profits/Losses of Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies in absence of any external financial assistnace<br />

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08<br />

(Year)<br />

Source: BK Chaturvedi Committee Report, 2008<br />

0<br />

30<br />

Macro-economic impacts<br />

IOCL<br />

HPCL<br />

BPCL<br />

The crude oil price increase over the <strong>last</strong> four years<br />

has significantly impacted the country's Balance of<br />

Figure 6: Net POL imports as a percentage of India's Total Exports<br />

Net POL imports as a percentage of India's Total exports<br />

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (April- 2008-09 (April-<br />

Sep) Sep)<br />

(Year)<br />

Source: Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell (PPAC) - Oil Prices and Taxes,<br />

GoI (2008); Ministry of Commerce, GoI (2008)<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

(per cent)<br />

Net POL Imports<br />

Net POL Imports as % of India's total exports


31<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Payments situation. For the period April- petroleum products, food and fertilizer, is likely to<br />

September 2008, the net Petroleum Oil and be in the range of approximately 6 to 7 percent of<br />

Lubricants (POL) imports were almost half of GDP. Together with State fiscal deficits in the order<br />

India's total commodity exports, as against 32 of 2 to 3 percent of GDP, the combined true fiscal<br />

percent for the corresponding period in 2007-08, deficit is clearly going to be in the range of 9 to 10<br />

thereby implying that a sizeable chunk of export<br />

earnings is used to finance import of petroleum<br />

percent of GDP.<br />

products (Figure 6).<br />

Burden sharing by stakeholders<br />

Decontrolling the petroleum product prices will<br />

attract huge investments in the refineries. The<br />

high crude oil prices will result in significantly<br />

higher margins for these refineries. Increased<br />

earnings from exporting the value added by these<br />

refineries can compensate for the rising oil import<br />

bill and make the BoP situation more favourable.<br />

The government's continued failure to gradually<br />

adjust domestic oil prices to international realities<br />

is expected to result in a burgeoning fiscal deficit.<br />

In the present system the transfer of oil bonds to<br />

OMCs is off the budget. It does not affect the fiscal<br />

and revenue deficits of the central government at<br />

the time of transfer as the issue of oil bonds is not<br />

accounted for in the Government budget.<br />

When a distress situation arises, the Government<br />

takes up evaluation of burden sharing amongst<br />

stakeholders. The main stakeholder remains the<br />

Central Government – the exchequer collecting<br />

taxes, the share-holder of downstream and<br />

upstream companies collecting dividends and the<br />

funding source of subsidies through budget<br />

allocations and oil bonds. Other stakeholders are<br />

State Governments who collect taxes, consumers<br />

who pay for fuel, downstream companies who<br />

have been made to bear under-recoveries,<br />

upstream oil companies who have been made to<br />

forego their profits and <strong>final</strong>ly the dealers<br />

operating retail stations who are remunerated<br />

through commissions (Figure 8).<br />

However, the petroleum product subsidies, which<br />

is the aggregate of subsidies on PDS kerosene and<br />

Domestic LPG provided from the Government<br />

budget and the implicit subsidies provided<br />

The debate over how much to pay the oil<br />

companies to make up for these under-recoveries<br />

would never end, and as a result oil companies<br />

would stand to lose. Various committees<br />

through issue of oil bonds as a percentage of the appointed by the Government in the past have<br />

total revenue collected by the Central suggested several mechanisms for sharing the<br />

Government through excise duties and levies on under-recoveries of the oil companies, but these<br />

petrol, diesel, PDS kerosene and domestic LPG,<br />

have increased to 82 percent in 2007-08 from a<br />

meagre 7 percent in 2004-05 (Figure 7).<br />

have not been adopted in practice by the<br />

Government. With market-determined pricing of<br />

petroleum product prices in place, the oil<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

Figure 7: Petroleum Product Subsidies as percentage of Revenues of Central Government<br />

from Petrol, Diesel, PDS Kerosene and Domestic LPG<br />

50000<br />

45000<br />

40000<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

Petroleum Product Subsidies as a percenatge of Revenues of Central Government from Petrol,<br />

Diesel, PDS Kerosene and Domestic LPG<br />

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08<br />

(Year)<br />

Source: Petroleum and Natural Gas Statistics 2008, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,<br />

GoI; PPAC-Oil Prices and Taxes, GoI (2008)<br />

According to expert estimates, central fiscal deficit<br />

after taking into account implicit subsidies on<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

(per cent)<br />

Revenue accruing to Central Government<br />

Fiscal Subsidy from Budget on PDS<br />

Kerosene and LPG and Oil Bonds issued by<br />

Central government<br />

Petroleum Product Subsidies as % Revenue<br />

companies would be spared from the burden of<br />

reporting their under-recoveries to the


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

(Rs. crores)<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

0<br />

10000<br />

20000<br />

30000<br />

40000<br />

0<br />

Government every fortnight and would petroleum products, consumers have responded<br />

completely eliminate their dependence on the to high oil price increases by reducing their<br />

Government and the upstream companies for consumption. In Philippines, allowing full passfinancing<br />

these under-recoveries. through of world market price to be passed on<br />

entirely increases to consumers along with a very<br />

Need of the hour: Decontrol pricing of<br />

petroleum products<br />

Figure 8: Burden sharing by various stakeholders<br />

Burden sharing by various stakeholders<br />

State Upstream OMCs Dealers Centre<br />

Source: Petroleum and Natural Gas Statistics 2008, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,<br />

GoI; PPAC-Oil Prices and Taxes, GoI (2008)<br />

32<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06<br />

2006-07<br />

2007-08<br />

active energy conservation campaign by the<br />

Government of Philippines, helped to reduce fuel<br />

consumption, achieving an eight percent<br />

reduction during the first 11 months of 2005<br />

compared to a year earlier.<br />

Market pricing will encourage efficiency in the use<br />

of petroleum products, which will save money for<br />

the country by reducing oil imports. In India, the Removing the subsidy will considerably reduce the<br />

capping of prices has also led to diversion and subsidy burden and subsequently the fiscal deficit<br />

wasteful consumption of certain petroleum of the Government thereby freeing up huge<br />

products. For instance, a comparison of diesel resources for it to spend on productive ventures<br />

consumption between the periods April-June and social sectors.<br />

2008 shows an increase of over 11 percent over<br />

2007-08 for same period. Due to artificially<br />

depressed prices for diesel, the demand for Decontrolling the prices will certainly have an<br />

industrial products such as FO, LSHS, Naphtha, impact on household expenditure directly from<br />

and LDO has been partially substituted with the higher petroleum prices and indirectly via<br />

increased consumption of diesel by certain passing on of petroleum prices to other goods and<br />

industrial consumers in sectors such as cement, services. The impacts of such price increase can be<br />

coal, steel, mining etc. for captive power mitigated by directly subsidizing the deserving<br />

generation. strata of society rather than product subsidy.<br />

International experience of three countries which<br />

recently raised petroleum product prices, and key<br />

International experience suggests that in mitigating measures undertaken by them to<br />

countries with market-determined prices of protect the poor is as follows.


Ghana, Indonesia and Jordan all recently observable household socio-economic<br />

raised petroleum product price. The key characteristics. Beneficiary cards and<br />

mitigating measures they took to protect the receipt coupons are printed and<br />

poor were: delivered by the post office. Eligible<br />

households with access to a post office<br />

collect their cash quarterly on designated<br />

Ghana days. Those in remote areas without such<br />

access receive cash in their village.<br />

• Fees for attending primary and juniorsecondary<br />

school were eliminated. • Some budgetary savings from reducing<br />

• Extra funds were made available for subsidies were reallocated to existing<br />

primary health care programs education, health and infrastructure<br />

concentrated in the poorest areas programs that disproportionately benefit<br />

through the existing Community Health low and middle income households.<br />

Compound Scheme. • Initially, the subsidy on kerosene was not<br />

• Investment in the provision of mass substantially reduced, and its price<br />

urban transport was expanded and remained at two-thirds of the world price.<br />

expedited.<br />

H o w e v e r, s u b s e q u e n t t o t h e<br />

• Extra funds were made available to<br />

expand a rural electrification scheme.<br />

implementation of the transfer program,<br />

the kerosene subsidy has been<br />

substantially reduced.<br />

Indonesia<br />

Mitigating Measures on account of price rise -<br />

Country Experience<br />

33<br />

Jordan<br />

Indonesia has an extensive history of<br />

subsidizing certain oil products. The<br />

continuation of this policy has vastly<br />

increased total cost to Government.<br />

• The minimum wage was increased, as<br />

were the salaries of low -paid<br />

government employees.<br />

Eventually the Government took up the • A one-time bonus was given to lowchallenge<br />

of large fuel price increase, and income government employees and<br />

simultaneously addressed potential adverse pensioners.<br />

impacts on the poor. • An electricity lifeline tariff was<br />

maintained at current low levels-<br />

• An unprecedented cash transfer program<br />

electricity access is almost universal.<br />

to 16 million poor families was • Cash transfers were provided to other<br />

implemented. Under the program, each low income households.<br />

family receives Rp. 300,000 (about<br />

US$30) every three months. The full<br />

annual cost of the program is estimated<br />

at nearly 0.7 percent of GDP. The<br />

identification of poor households is<br />

based on an existing approach used by<br />

the Central Statistics Bureau, which<br />

calculates a “proxy-means score” for<br />

• The government announced a plan to<br />

increase funding to the National Aid<br />

Fund as part of a program to improve the<br />

design and implementation of this<br />

national safety net program with World<br />

Bank assistance.<br />

potentially poor households based on Source: IMF Working Paper WP/07/71<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Common Minimum Programme of UPA Government<br />

Energy Security:<br />

The UPA government will immediately put in place policies to enhance the<br />

country's energy security particularly in the area of oil. Overseas investments in<br />

the hydrocarbon industry will be actively encouraged. An integrated energy<br />

policy linked with sustainable development will be put in place.<br />

Election Manifesto of National Democratic Alliance for 2004<br />

General Elections (Agenda for Oil and Gas Sector):-<br />

• Enhanced oil production through increased exploitation of own<br />

resources as well as purchase of ownership in oil fields overseas.<br />

• Dependence on fossil fuels to be lessened through a concerted<br />

drive for harnessing non-conventional energy sources.<br />

• Commercial exploitation of discovered gas fields will begin by<br />

2005.<br />

• The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Bill will be<br />

enacted. in 2007<br />

It is high time that we get out of this highly complex consumers know what exactly they have to pay for<br />

and opaque pricing policy of petroleum products petroleum products as they pay for a number of<br />

once for all. We should take it out from the realm other products in a market economy.<br />

of politics back to the realm of economics, so that<br />

34


35<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

The PetroFed pavilion at the Petrotech-2009 Shri A. K. Arora was also called upon to chair a<br />

exhibition at Pragati Maidan was inaugurated by Technical Session during the conference at Vigyan<br />

Shri S. Sundareshan, Additional Secretary, Bhavan on January 13, 2009 on 'Emerging Energy<br />

Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas on January Options – 2 (CTL/GTL/BTL)'. The keynote speaker<br />

11, 2009. during the session was Dr. Jennifer Holmgren,<br />

UOP, LLC, USA who spoke on Advances in Pyrolysis<br />

PetroFed actively assisted in the organisation of<br />

Petrotech-2009 international oil & gas conference<br />

& exhibition at New Delhi. The Director General,<br />

PetroFed, Shri A. K. Arora was a member of the<br />

Steering Committee. The Director (Comm. &<br />

Technology. The other speakers were Shri E.<br />

Valotti, ENI India Limited on the GTL approach; Dr.<br />

Girish K. Chitnis, ExxonMobil on production of<br />

gasoline from coal; and Dr. Sudip Maity, Central<br />

Institute of Mining & Fuel Research on liquid<br />

hydrocarbon production from coal, biomass and<br />

Mktg.), PetroFed, Shri Y. Sahai was on the three<br />

member panel of judges to select the best<br />

exhibitors in various categories at the exhibition.<br />

Shri S. Sundareshan, Additional Secretary, Ministry of<br />

Petroleum & Natural Gas inaugurating PetroFed<br />

pavilion at the exhibition. On his right is Shri S. Behuria,<br />

Chairman, PetroFed and Chairman, IndianOil and on<br />

his left Shri A. K. Arora, DG, PetroFed.<br />

Events<br />

PetroFed in Petrotech-2009<br />

syngas.<br />

A view of the PetroFed pavilion.<br />

Workshop for Academia on SHE<br />

A workshop on 'Safety, Health & Environmental Inaugurating the workshop Prof. S. C. Saxena,<br />

Management in Hydrocarbon Industry' was Director, IIT, Roorkee stressed on the need for<br />

organised by the Petroleum Federation of India in education and training on SHE aspects and their<br />

association with the Lovraj Kumar Memorial Trust inclusion in the chemical engineering curricula of<br />

(LKMT) and the Department of Chemical institutions. He expressed the hope that the M-<br />

Engineering of IIT, Roorkee from January 22-24, Tech programme in Industrial Pollution<br />

2009. The three-day workshop at IIT, Roorkee Abatement at IIT, Roorkee will help in bridging the<br />

aimed to provide inputs on latest developments to<br />

teaching faculty members of technical institutions<br />

gap in this area.<br />

in north India on the extremely important subject<br />

of safety, health & environment in the<br />

hydrocarbon industry.<br />

In his presidential address, Shri A. K. Arora,<br />

Director General, PetroFed and Trustee, LKMT<br />

emphasised the need for regular updation of


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

faculty knowledge in SHE management and the Campus, IIT, Roorkee introduced the workshop. A<br />

need to enhance research capabilities in the area vote of thanks at the inaugural ceremony was<br />

at institutes. proposed by Shri S. L. Das, Director (BD&C),<br />

PetroFed.<br />

Shri J. B. Verma, ED, OISD in his lively and thought<br />

provoking keynote address underlined, through The workshop was spread over five sessions and<br />

examples, the importance of loss prevention and speakers were drawn from among experts from<br />

safe operations in the hydrocarbon industry. He the oil & gas industry including R&D organizations<br />

offered help in providing industrial insight to the and the Oil Industry Safety Directorate besides<br />

students of IIT, Roorkee undergoing M-Tech in SHE Controller of Explosives, the Directorate General<br />

and Hazardous Management. of Mines Safety, Directorate General, Factory<br />

Advice Service & Labour Institutes and process &<br />

equipment suppliers.<br />

The Secretary General of Petrotech Society, Shri J.<br />

L. Raina lauded the initiative of training for<br />

teaching faculty. Participants were earlier Faculty members from five states and union<br />

welcomed by Prof. I. D. Mall, Head of the territories from north India participated in the<br />

Department, Chemical Engineering, IIT, Roorkee workshop.<br />

while Prof. I. M. Mishra, Dean, Saharanpur<br />

Shri A. K. Arora, Director General, PetroFed lighting the<br />

lamp at the inauguration of the workshop. Others (L-R):<br />

Prof. S. C. Saxena, Director, IIT, Roorkee; Shri J. L. Raina,<br />

Secretary General, Petrotech Society; Shri S. L. Das,<br />

Director (BD&C), PetroFed.<br />

36<br />

Workshop inaugural function. Seated (L-R): Prof. I. M.<br />

Mishra, Shri J. B. Verma, Shri A. K. Arora, Prof. S. C.<br />

Saxena, Shri J. L. Raina, Shri S. L. Das and Prof. I. D.<br />

Mall.<br />

Group photograph of the participants at the workshop. A section of the participants.


"Energy and Climate Summit"<br />

(L-R): Dr. Jyoti Parikh, Executive Director, IRADe; Shri<br />

Vilas Muttemwar, Hon'ble Union Minister of State for<br />

New & Re<strong>new</strong>able Energy; Shri Sushil Kumar Shinde,<br />

Hon'ble Union Minister for Power; Shri Montek Singh<br />

Ahluwalia, Hon'ble Deputy Chairman, Planning<br />

Commission; Dr. Kirit Parikh, Member, Planning<br />

Commission.<br />

37<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

PetroFed associated with Integrated Research and Union Minister for Power while the inaugural<br />

Action for Development (IRADe) in organising the address was delivered by Shri Montek Singh<br />

Energy and Climate Summit-2009 on February 3- Ahluwalia, Hon'ble Deputy Chairman, Planning<br />

4, 2009 at New Delhi. Commission. Shri Vilas Muttemwar, Hon'ble<br />

Union Minister of State for New & Re<strong>new</strong>able<br />

On each day there were three sessions besides the Energy delivered the Special Address. Participants<br />

inaugural on the opening day and the valedictory were welcomed by Dr. Kirit Parikh, Member,<br />

session on the closing day addressing the theme Planning Commission and a vote of thanks<br />

of “Meeting New Challenges”. During the proposed by Dr. Jyoti Parikh, Executive Director,<br />

inauguration the presidential address was IRADe.<br />

delivered by Shri Sushil Kumar Shinde, Hon'ble<br />

Shri Sushil Kumar Shinde, Hon'ble Union Minister for<br />

Power delivering presidential address.<br />

In its series of Guest Lectures and Thought Dr. Bhasin in his presentation clarified the<br />

Leadership programmes, PetroFed organised, in distinction between Invention and Innovation and<br />

association with Lovraj Kumar Memorial Trust, a identified the enablers and barriers between the<br />

lecture by Dr. Madan M. Bhasin on 'Invention & two through examples like ethylene epoxidation<br />

Innovation: Some Reflections' on February 6, catalysis, three-way automotive emissions control<br />

2009 at New Delhi. Dr. Bhasin who and the production of ethylene from methane by<br />

superannuated as Sr. Scientist from The Dow<br />

Chemical Company in December 2008 drew on<br />

selective oxidative coupling of methane.<br />

his 45 years' experience to delineate the path for<br />

conversion of an invention to commercialisation<br />

A Ph. D. in Physical Chemistry from the University<br />

through innovation.<br />

"Invention and Innovation"<br />

of Notre Dame, Dr. Bhasin joined Union Carbide<br />

Corporation in 1963. He is a recipient of over a<br />

dozen awards and honours, has 22 U.S. patents,<br />

Chairing the session, Sh. J.P. Kapur, Trustee, Lovraj besides foreign patents to his credit and has 21<br />

Kumar Memorial Trust recalled developments in publications in journals besides editing a book.<br />

invention and innovation in petrochemicals<br />

during the past 40 years.


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Session Chairman Shri J.P. Kapur delivering opening<br />

remarks and introducing the Speaker Dr Bhasin (R). On<br />

left (forward) Shri S L Das, Director(BD&C), PetroFed.<br />

38<br />

An animated Q&A session in progress.<br />

Stakeholder Consultation on India-EU Agreement<br />

The Petroleum Federation of India organised a Dr. Archana S. Mathur, Economic Adviser, Ministry<br />

'Stakeholder Consultation on Energy Services' of Petroleum & Natural Gas elaborated on the<br />

under the aegis of the Department of Commerce, potential for growth in Indian oil & gas industry<br />

Government of India to seek inputs for a Broadbased<br />

Trade & Investment Agreement between<br />

and trade with the European Union.<br />

India and the European Union. The half-day<br />

consultation on February 27, 2009 at New Delhi<br />

was in knowledge partnership with the Indian<br />

Council for Research on International Economic<br />

Relations (ICRIER) and the Centre for WTO Studies<br />

of the Department of Commerce.<br />

Chairing the session, Ms. Bharathi S. Sihag, Joint<br />

Secretary, Department of Commerce,<br />

Government of India urged participants to voice<br />

their opinions freely to enable Government take<br />

them on board while formulating negotiating<br />

strategy.<br />

Welcoming participants Shri A. K. Arora, Director<br />

General, PetroFed drew attention to PetroFed's<br />

role as nodal agency for coordinating matters<br />

pertaining to WTO for the oil & gas sector. He<br />

considered the present times as the most<br />

opportune for negotiating favourable trade<br />

agreements.<br />

Session Chairperson, Ms. Bharathi S. Sihag, Joint<br />

Secretary, Department of Commerce, Government of<br />

India (R) being welcomed by Mr. A. K. Arora, Director<br />

General, PetroFed.<br />

Presentations were made on the Broad-based<br />

Trade & Investment Agreement between India and<br />

European Union by Mr. Amit Yadav, Director,<br />

Department of Commernce, Government of India<br />

and on their studies pertaining to consultation on<br />

energy services by Prof. Arpita Mukherjee and Ms.<br />

Smita Miglani of ICRIER.<br />

Dr. Archana S. Mathur, Economic Adviser, Ministry of<br />

Petroleum & Natural Gas (R) being greeted by Mr. A. K.<br />

Arora, Director General, PetroFed.


Mr. Amit Yadav, Director, Department of Commerce,<br />

Government of India (R) being presented a bouquet by<br />

Mr. A. . Arora, Director General, PetroFed.<br />

Dr. Arpita Mukherjee, Prof., ICRIER making her<br />

presentation..<br />

A section of the participants. In the foreground (R-L): Dr.<br />

Arpita Mukherjee, Prof., ICEIER and Ms. Smita Miglani,<br />

ICRIER.<br />

39<br />

Ms. Bharathi S. Sihag addressing participants.<br />

A section of the participants.<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Mr. S. L. Das, Director (BD&C), PetroFed raising his<br />

query during the Q & A session


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

To learn from and leverage the Japanese Mr. Shogo Saegusa, Co-chairman Fuels &<br />

experience on auto fuel quality the Petroleum Lubricants Committee of Japan Automobile<br />

Federation of India (PetroFed) organised a two- Manufacturers Association (JAMA) in his theme<br />

day conference on Fuel Quality and Vehicular address brought out the relationship between fuel<br />

Emissions in association with the Bureau of Indian improvement and vehicle technology and the<br />

Standards (BIS) on March 17-18, 2009 at New<br />

Delhi. Technical collaboration for the conference<br />

transition of emission regulation in Japan.<br />

was provided by the Japanese Automobile<br />

Research Institute (JARI) and the Ministry of<br />

Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) of Japan.<br />

Several other Japanese organizations like JAMA,<br />

JASO, JISC offered technical assistance during the<br />

conference which also associated actively the<br />

Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers<br />

While proposing a vote of thanks at end of the<br />

inaugural session, Shri A. K. Arora, Director<br />

General, PetroFed drew attention to the<br />

recommendations submitted by PetroFed after the<br />

seminar organised on Auto Fuel Policy in 2006.<br />

The Review Committee on the Auto Fuel Policy,<br />

(SIAM).<br />

Indo-Japanese Conference<br />

on<br />

Fuel Quality and Vehicular Emissions<br />

Mr Rakesh Verma, Addl. Director General, BIS , lighting<br />

the lamp. Others (L-R) Mr L N Gupta, Jt Secretary<br />

MoPNG, Mr A K Arora, DG, PetroFed, Ms Supriya<br />

Dhingra, PetroFed, Mr Shogo Seagusa, Fuels and<br />

Lubricants Committee Co-Chairman, JAMA, Japan.<br />

40<br />

set-up by the MoP&NG, had echoed most of the<br />

recommendations he added. Particular attention<br />

was drawn by him to tackling issues of inspection<br />

The over 140 participants from three score and maintenance of in-use vehicles and research<br />

organizations were welcomed by Ms. Madhulika studies on fuel efficiency and cost effectiveness of<br />

Prakash, Dy. Director General (Technical), BIS. different fuels.<br />

Inaugurating the conference Shri Rakesh Verma,<br />

Addl. Director General, BIS exhorted participants<br />

The conference, which attracted quality<br />

to make the best use of the opportunity offered<br />

participation from almost all related sectors and<br />

with the presence of Japanese experts. Shri L. N.<br />

agencies, was spread into three sessions on each<br />

Gupta, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum &<br />

day besides the inaugural on the first day and a<br />

Natural Gas (MOP&NG), in his presidential<br />

panel discussion in conclusion. The subjects<br />

address complimented PetroFed for holding this<br />

covered Fuels & Standards, Vehicular Emission &<br />

second conference on auto fuels and called for<br />

Environment, Next Generation Vehicle and Fuel<br />

evaluations of all options in formulating<br />

appropriate strategies while carrying out midcourse<br />

correction, if required, in the Auto Fuel<br />

Policy.<br />

Initiatives, and Alternative Fuels.<br />

Seated (L-R) Mr A K Arora, DG, PetroFed, Mr L N Gupta,<br />

Jt Secretary, MoPNG, Mr Rakesh Verma, Addl. Director<br />

General, BIS, Mr Shogo Seagusa, Fuels and Lubricants<br />

Committee Co-Chairman, JAMA, Japan, Mrs.<br />

Madhulika Prakash, DDG(T), BIS.


Mr L N Gupta, Jt. Secretary, MoPNG delivering<br />

presidential address.<br />

Mr Dilip Chenoy, DG, SIAM (Centre) chairing Session II.<br />

Others (L-R) Mr K. Murali, Director (Refineries) HPCL, Dr<br />

(Mrs) Vijay Malik, Head (PCD), BIS, Ms Keiko Hirota,<br />

Researcher, JARI, Mr B. P. Singh, GM (Operations) Retail<br />

HQs, BPCL .<br />

Mr Anand Kumar, Director (R&D), Indian Oil (2nd from<br />

right) chairing Session IV. Others seated in forefront (L-<br />

R) Dr Atsushi Kameoka, Group Leader of Environment<br />

and Energy Division, JARI, Japan, Ms Michiko<br />

Watanabe, METI, Japan, Mr B. Sengupta, Former<br />

Member Secretary, Central Pollution Control Board.<br />

41<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Ms Keiko Hirota, Researcher, Public Policy and Economic<br />

Research Division, JARI (Centre) chairing Session I.<br />

Others (L-R) Dr A. A. Gupta DGM, IndianOil, R&D, Dr<br />

Kiyoyuki Minato, Senior Researcher, Public Policy and<br />

Economic Research Division, JARI, Japan.<br />

Mr B. Bhanot, Former Director, ARAI (3rd from left)<br />

chairing Session III. Others (L-R) Dr Kiyoyuki Minato,<br />

JARI, Japan, Dr Rakesh Kumar, Scientist, NEERI, Mr N. S.<br />

Murthy, Senior Vice President, Reliance Industries<br />

Limited.<br />

Mr Ashok Dhar, Senior Vice President, Reliance<br />

Industries Ltd. (Centre) chairing Session V. Others (L-R)<br />

Mr P. D. Bahukhandi, General Manager (QC), IndianOil,<br />

Ms Michiko Watanabe, METI, Japan, Mr K K Gandhi,<br />

Executive Director, SIAM, Mr M. K. Chaudhari, Senior<br />

Dy. Director, The Automotive Research Association of<br />

India.


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Mr M. B. Lal, Chairman, Scientific Advisory Committee,<br />

MoP&NG and Member Technical (P&NG), Appellate<br />

Tribunal for Electricity (Centre) chairing Session VI.<br />

Others (L-R) Mr Shogo Saegusa, JAMA, Japan, Dr. Y. P.<br />

Rao, Vice President (Technical), Gulf Oil Corporation<br />

Ltd.<br />

42<br />

Mr K Murli, Director (Refineries), HPCL (5th from left)<br />

Chairing panel discussion. Others (L-R) Mr K K Gandhi,<br />

SIAM , Mr Shogo Saegusa, JAMA, Japan, Dr R.K.<br />

Malhotra, Executive Director (R&D), IndianOil, Ms<br />

Michiko Watanabe, METI, Japan, Mr Ashok Dhar,<br />

Reliance Industries Ltd, Mr B. Sengupta, Mr N. S. Murthy,<br />

Reliance Industries Limited, Dr R. K. Bajaj, Director, BIS.<br />

LNG Handling, Storage & Regasification<br />

In its series of Guest Lectures and Thought of the LNG chain during his presentation. He<br />

Leadership Programmes, PetroFed organised a began with the salient characteristics of natural<br />

lecture on 'LNG Handling, Storage & gas and its utilisation and went on to elaborate on<br />

Regasification' by Mr. Sham Sunder, Adviser the LNG cycle, its handling, processing and<br />

(Technical), Essar Oil Limited at the PetroFed regasification as well as various types of storage<br />

Conference Hall on March 26, 2009. tanks and vaporisation schemes. He also covered<br />

shipping & transportation of LNG and operating<br />

limits at port and safety system.<br />

Chairing the session, Mr. Suresh Mathur, Director<br />

(Oil & Gas), Essar Oil Limited and former<br />

Managing Director, Petronet LNG Limited An engineering graduate from Punjab University<br />

highlighted the significance of natural gas in the and a M.S. from Oklahoma State University, USA,<br />

21st century and the global challenges presented Mr. Sham Sunder has earlier worked in USA for<br />

in LNG production and marketing. about 7 years in a large Petro-Chemical Complex<br />

and put in almost 17 years in Engineers India<br />

Limited. He has presented numerous papers at<br />

Mr. Sham Sunder, with his decade long experience various fora and has two U.S. patents to his credit<br />

in Petronet LNG Limited as Director (Technical) on Liquefaction of Natural Gas and Mechanical<br />

and a decade earlier in GAIL, covered all aspects energy from geothermal resources.


Session Chairman Mr. Suresh Mathur, Director, Oil &<br />

Gas, Essar Oil (L) being greeted by Mr. S. L. Das, Director<br />

(BD&C), PetroFed.<br />

Mr. Sham Sunder, Adviser (Techncial), Essar Oil Limited<br />

delivering his lecture.<br />

Snippets<br />

43<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Mr. Sham Sunder, Adviser (Techncial), Essar Oil Limited<br />

(L) being welcomed by Mr. Suresh Mathur.<br />

A section of the participants.<br />

Estimated value of India's private Percentage of Indians who say they Average minutes spent on job<br />

have issues with their weight : 54<br />

security industry, in billion search every day by unemployed<br />

dollars:2.3<br />

Estimated number of persons<br />

Percentage of Indians who say they<br />

seek weight loss information from<br />

workers in the US, France and<br />

Spain : 41/27/22<br />

employed by India's Private security<br />

doctors and Internet : 61 & 47<br />

Average minutes spent on job<br />

industry, in million : 5.5 Percentage of people worldwide search every day by unemployed<br />

Projected number of persons<br />

employed by India's private<br />

who say they are struggling with<br />

their weight : 60<br />

workers in Italy, Germany and the<br />

UK : 12/10/8<br />

security industry by end-2009, Percentage of people worldwide Average minutes spent on job<br />

making it the country's largest who say they seek weight loss search everyday by unemployed<br />

employer, in million : 6.5<br />

information from doctors and<br />

Internet : 60 & 36<br />

workers in Sweden and Finland :<br />

6& 3<br />

Courtesy : Business India


www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Our Member Organisations<br />

Adani Energy Ltd.<br />

Axens India Pvt. Limited<br />

Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd.<br />

BP India Services Pvt. Ltd.<br />

British Gas India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Cairn India Ltd.<br />

Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA)<br />

Chennai Petroleum Corp. Ltd.<br />

Chevron Lubricants India Pvt. Ltd<br />

Chevron Petroleum India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Engineers India Ltd.<br />

Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Essar Oil Ltd.<br />

GAIL(India) Ltd.<br />

Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd.<br />

Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited<br />

Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd.<br />

HLS Asia Ltd.<br />

Honeywell Automation<br />

HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd.<br />

IMC Ltd.<br />

Indian Oil Corp. Ltd.<br />

Indian OilTanking Ltd.<br />

Indraprastha Gas Ltd.<br />

Industrial Development Services<br />

Jindal Drilling Industries Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Jubilant Oil & Gas Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Larsen & Toubro Ltd.<br />

Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd.<br />

Mitsui Chemicals India Private Limited<br />

MMTC Ltd.<br />

Naftogaz India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Nagarjuna Oil Corp. Ltd.<br />

Niko Resources<br />

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd.<br />

Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.<br />

Oil India Ltd.<br />

Petroleum India International<br />

Petronas India (Holdings) Pte. Ltd.<br />

Petronet India Ltd.<br />

Petronet LNG Ltd.<br />

PFC Energy<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Prize Petroleum Co. Ltd.<br />

Punj Lloyd Ltd.<br />

Reliance Industries Ltd.<br />

Santos International Operations Pty. Ltd.<br />

SAP<br />

Schlumberger Asia Services Limited<br />

Shell India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Sud-Chemie India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Tata Petrodyne Ltd.<br />

Tecnimont ICB<br />

Total SA<br />

Transocean Limited<br />

University of Petroleum & Energy Studies (UPES)<br />

UOP India Pvt. Ltd.<br />

World L. P. Gas Association<br />

44<br />

Mr. Rajeev Sharma<br />

Mr. H. L. Suresh<br />

Mr. Ashok Sinha<br />

Mr. Sashi Mukundan<br />

Mr. Alan Derek Fisher<br />

Mr. Rahul Dhir<br />

Mr. James Burkhard<br />

Mr. K. K. Acharya<br />

Dr. Akhil Kumar<br />

Mr. John Digby<br />

Mr. James H. Quigley<br />

Mr. Mukesh Rohatgi<br />

Mr. Rajiv Memani<br />

Mr. Naresh Nayyar<br />

Dr. U.D. Choubey<br />

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Modi<br />

Mr. D.J. Pandian<br />

Mr. Arun Balakrishnan<br />

Mr. Rajeev Grover<br />

Mr. Vimal Kapur<br />

Mr. Prabh Das<br />

Mr. A. Mallesh Rao<br />

Mr. S. Behuria<br />

Mr. Jayanta Bhuyan<br />

Mr. Rajesh Vedvyas<br />

Mr. R. K. Gupta<br />

Mr. Naresh Kumar<br />

Mr. Atul Sathe<br />

Mr. A.M. Naik<br />

Mr. U. K. Basu<br />

Mr. Shingo Shibata<br />

Mr. Sanjiv Batra<br />

Mr. M.N. Khan<br />

Mr. S. Rammohan<br />

Mr. Larry Fisher<br />

Mr. B.K. Das<br />

Mr. R.S. Sharma<br />

Mr. N.M. Borah<br />

Mr. Arjun Hira<br />

Mr. Mohd. Rauff Nabi Bax<br />

Dr. Anand Teltumbde<br />

Mr. P. Das Gupta<br />

Mr. Robinson West<br />

Mr. N. Ramesh Rajan<br />

Mr. Rajan Kapoor<br />

Mr. Atul Punj<br />

Mr. Mukesh Ambani<br />

Ms. Madhu Toshniwal<br />

Mr. Ranjan Das<br />

Mr. Rajeev Sonthalia<br />

Mr. Vikram Singh Mehta<br />

Ms. Arshia A. Lalljee<br />

Mr. M.A. Pathan<br />

Mr. C. M. S. Rao<br />

Mr. Christian Chammas<br />

Mr. Steve Myers<br />

Dr. S.J. Chopra<br />

Mr. Gary P. Godwin<br />

Mr. James Rockall


Mr. S. Behuria Chairman<br />

Chairman, IOCL<br />

Mr. P. Raghavendran Vice-Chairman<br />

President (Refinery Business), RIL<br />

Mr. S. Mohan BPCL<br />

Director (HR)<br />

Mr. S. Chandrasekaran CPCL<br />

Director (Technical)<br />

Mr. B.C. Tripathi GAIL (India) Ltd.<br />

Director (Marketing)<br />

Mr. S. Roy Choudhury, HPCL<br />

Director (M)<br />

Mr. Dipak Chakravarty NRL<br />

Director (Technical)<br />

Mr. N. Bhalla Oil India Ltd.<br />

Executive Director (Corporate Affairs)<br />

Mr. A.K. Hazarika ONGC<br />

Director (Onshore)<br />

Governing Council<br />

Mr. M. A. Pathan Honorary Member<br />

Mr. A. K. Arora Director General<br />

45<br />

www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org


PETROFED<br />

Edited, Designed & Published by:<br />

Petroleum Federation of India<br />

1st Floor, IndianOil Bhavan, 1, Sri Aurobindo Marg, Yusuf Sarai, New Delhi - 110 016<br />

Phone : 2653 7483, 6566 4067 Fax : 2696 4840 E-mail : <strong>petrofed</strong>@<strong>petrofed</strong>.org Website : www.<strong>petrofed</strong>.org<br />

Printed by : PRINTEMPS INDIA Ph. : 98101 44481 E-mail : printempsindia@yahoo.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!