06.04.2013 Views

A Sumerian Palace and the "A" cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia

A Sumerian Palace and the "A" cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia

A Sumerian Palace and the "A" cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SUMERIAN PALACE AT MOUND "A," KISH 91<br />

A curious pl<strong>at</strong>form, 3.60 m long by 3.20 m wide, was found in <strong>the</strong> northwest<br />

corner of <strong>the</strong> chamber. It is entirely constructed of plano-convex bricks<br />

averaging 23 x 13.50 x 4-6 cm, laid nine courses deep. The wall against which<br />

<strong>the</strong> pl<strong>at</strong>form is set was also lined with bricks, four courses high <strong>and</strong> one<br />

brick thick. Mud was used for <strong>the</strong> mortar with bitumen in a few places, <strong>and</strong> exposed<br />

sides of <strong>the</strong> pl<strong>at</strong>form were heavily co<strong>at</strong>ed with bitumen. This pl<strong>at</strong>form may<br />

possibly have been a sleeping bench, as its height above <strong>the</strong> footing was 55<br />

centimetres. Ano<strong>the</strong>r altern<strong>at</strong>ive is th<strong>at</strong> it was a st<strong>and</strong> for pottery. The fact<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is of early d<strong>at</strong>e is proved by burial 23 being placed upon it. When this<br />

pl<strong>at</strong>form was demolished to ascertain its structure, a well-preserved unbaked<br />

tablet was found bene<strong>at</strong>h it, inscribed with very archaic characters. This tablet<br />

is shown in Pl<strong>at</strong>e XXXVI, Figs. 10 <strong>and</strong> 12. Chambers 29, 30, <strong>and</strong> 31 are bounded<br />

on <strong>the</strong> east by a wall 3.90 m thick. This wall corresponds with <strong>the</strong> outer wall<br />

of <strong>the</strong> palace <strong>and</strong> is evidently part of it, though how far it extended to <strong>the</strong><br />

north it has been impossible to find out owing to denud<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side of this wall is wh<strong>at</strong> is perhaps <strong>the</strong> most interesting fe<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

of <strong>the</strong> palace, namely, a flight of steps which must have led into <strong>the</strong> most impor-<br />

tant part of <strong>the</strong> building. Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, however, this portion of <strong>the</strong> palace has<br />

been almost entirely swept away by wea<strong>the</strong>ring. The steps are eight in number.<br />

The width of each tread is 31 cm <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> height 15 centimetres. The total rise<br />

from <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> pavement to <strong>the</strong> top step is 1.28 m <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> width of <strong>the</strong><br />

stairway 2.35 centimetres. The bricks forming <strong>the</strong> steps measure 20.50 x 13 x<br />

3.50-5 centimetres. They were unkaked <strong>and</strong> laid in mud mortar. It was impossible<br />

to ascertain whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> stairway was built of solid brickwork or filled with rubble<br />

in <strong>the</strong> middle, for this would have entailed its partial destruction, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

gained would be of little real value. The steps show surprisingly little<br />

wear, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y must have been covered with ei<strong>the</strong>r wood or copper. The l<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

is <strong>the</strong> more probable, as it could be removed on account of its value without leaving<br />

any trace behind, whereas a wood or burnt-brick covering would have left some<br />

trace behind (Pl<strong>at</strong>eXXV, Figs. 1-3). On mounting <strong>the</strong> steps, a spacious entrance<br />

(34), 3.10 m wide, leads into a vestibule (33) of <strong>the</strong> same width, from which<br />

doorways open into o<strong>the</strong>r chambers <strong>and</strong> passages to east <strong>and</strong> west. Unfortu-<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ely, owing to denud<strong>at</strong>ion, no trace of <strong>the</strong> upper walling of th<strong>at</strong> part of <strong>the</strong><br />

building lying to <strong>the</strong> west <strong>and</strong> north of 33 could be found, though <strong>the</strong> found<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

(denoted by dotted lines) are well preserved. On <strong>the</strong> east, however, three cham-<br />

bers (36, 37, <strong>and</strong> 38) with <strong>the</strong>ir doorways have been traced.<br />

The walls of chamber 33 were found on excav<strong>at</strong>ion to have been beautifully<br />

plastered with white stucco <strong>and</strong> paved with burnt bricks measuring 23 x 14.50<br />

X 4.50-6 cm, set in bitumen. Traces of bitumen on <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong>se bricks suggest<br />

th<strong>at</strong> bitumen was also laid over <strong>the</strong>m. The walls of <strong>the</strong> chamber averaged only<br />

40 cm in height; but we were fortun<strong>at</strong>e in being able to recover as much as we did.<br />

Chamber 36 measures 9.50 m in length by 3.70 m in width. Its walls also<br />

were stuccoed, but <strong>the</strong>re was no trace of a flooring of brick. The same is true of<br />

chamber 38 whose dimensions are 9.40 by 3.70 metres. The narrow passage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!