07.04.2013 Views

The UNDP-GEF POPs Resource Kit - International POPs Elimination ...

The UNDP-GEF POPs Resource Kit - International POPs Elimination ...

The UNDP-GEF POPs Resource Kit - International POPs Elimination ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eliminate <strong>POPs</strong> and the problems they cause. Many in developing countries welcomed the<br />

Stockholm Convention as a vehicle that helps raise awareness at home, and that helps<br />

mobilize the resources needed to take meaningful action to manage and eliminate harmful<br />

chemical pollutants.<br />

During negotiations on the treaty, developing countries and countries in transition<br />

sought provisions that not only address global concerns, but also ones that address domestic<br />

needs and concerns. This was largely successful. <strong>The</strong> Stockholm Convention Preamble<br />

mentions local exposures to <strong>POPs</strong> as an important health concern of developing countries.<br />

This precedes any reference in the treaty to long-range transport.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Convention explicitly acknowledges, at the insistence of many developing<br />

country governments, that: “sustainable economic and social development and eradication of<br />

poverty are the first and overriding priorities of the developing country Parties.”<br />

Governments indicated support for Convention objectives and measures, but many also<br />

clearly indicated they have limited resources and they have other, higher priorities. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

governments did not wish to sacrifice resources dedicated to their higher priority interests in<br />

order to meet Stockholm Convention objectives. To reflect this concern, the Convention<br />

states:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> developed country Parties shall provide new and additional financial<br />

resources to enable developing country Parties and Parties with economies in<br />

transition to meet the agreed full incremental costs of implementing measures<br />

which fulfill their obligations under this Convention …”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Stockholm Convention links effective implementation of Convention<br />

commitments on the part of developing country Parties to the performance of donor<br />

governments in meeting their Convention commitments to provide financial resources,<br />

technical assistance and technology transfer. This provides a framework for mobilizing<br />

assistance and for building awareness. Many who work in Health Ministries, Environment<br />

Ministries, Agriculture Ministries, and others, and who have responsibilities for government<br />

activities to protect public health and the environment from toxic chemical pollutants<br />

welcome the Convention and the opportunities it can help provide.<br />

E. <strong>POPs</strong> Sources and Convention Provisions<br />

Of the initial twelve <strong>POPs</strong> covered under the Stockholm Convention some have been<br />

used as pesticides, some as industrial chemicals and some arise as unwanted byproducts of<br />

chemical and combustion processes.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se different categories overlap. For example, Mirex, which was produced<br />

primarily for use as a pesticide has also been used as a fire retardant; PCBs, which were<br />

produced as industrial chemicals in large quantities, are also generated as unwanted<br />

10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<strong>UNDP</strong>-<strong>GEF</strong> <strong>POPs</strong> <strong>Resource</strong> <strong>Kit</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!