08.04.2013 Views

The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA

The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA

The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comments to tweeter modifications<br />

1.<br />

First of all your tweeter mod is excellent, the<br />

sibilance has really gone and the sound is much<br />

smoother than before.<br />

Zoltan.<br />

2.<br />

This is quite a delicate operation! <strong>The</strong> only thing I<br />

found that was not in your instructions was that after<br />

the rubber gasket is removed, it is necessary to tap<br />

the plastic casing on the side to allow the driver parts<br />

to fall free (at least it was in my case). It confused me<br />

for a few minutes until I figured it out. Aside from<br />

that, everything went well. I did both drivers at the<br />

same time and was keen to hear the result, so I've<br />

temporarily attached the back plate to the housing<br />

with electrical tape - don't worry, it's airtight and I'll<br />

redo it properly with silicone tomorrow.<br />

Well, all I can say is that together with the minor<br />

crossover mods and extra Damar coating on the 8535,<br />

this makes the most significant improvement since<br />

your original notch filter. Everything you say in your<br />

paper is 100 per cent correct - the tweeter coating<br />

really does transform the speaker. <strong>The</strong> last traces of<br />

the original <strong>clone</strong>'s "technicolour" sound are gone, so<br />

I guess it's not going to please everybody, but<br />

sibilants now sound totally natural, even if they are<br />

still a bit more pronounced than in some other<br />

designs. <strong>The</strong> important thing is that they don't "ring"<br />

and they don't irritate. I also agree with your<br />

description of the treble as "darker", and yet - you're<br />

right - at the same time there's more presence to the<br />

sound! I think we've been unfair to this tweeter; it<br />

had far more potential than we were allowing for.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is now obviously far better integration between<br />

the two drivers. It's very strange, but I have to agree<br />

with you also that the midrange "hardness" is now<br />

much reduced - or at least much less obvious, and it's<br />

possible to hear depth layering where it didn't exist<br />

before. I have yet to listen to all my "difficult"<br />

recordings, but the few I have tried all showed a<br />

marked reduction in "listener fatigue". I can enjoy<br />

most of them again! I can't say I always find the<br />

"carbon-fibre" midrange to my taste, but I can now<br />

appreciate it for what it does. <strong>The</strong> <strong>clone</strong> truly does<br />

now fit the description of a "high-end" speaker. Very<br />

impressive.<br />

Darryl.<br />

3.<br />

I have been briefly comparing Troel's modified 8513<br />

tweeter (ferrofliud removed an applied damar coating<br />

to cone) and it is very nice. I must modify the woofer<br />

crossover to Troel's suggestions before I make any<br />

final conclusions but dropped it into the current<br />

crossover and it sounds more neutral, less sibilant<br />

when CD tracks have too much energy. <strong>The</strong> same<br />

36<br />

basic sound character is retained but enough treble<br />

zing is shaved off for those who want this, IMO. At<br />

this point in time I still prefer the standard<br />

unmodified tweeter as there is more of that original<br />

Proac lushness, sweetness and detail, but can be<br />

sibilant on some tracks, which seems to be the tradeoff.<br />

Al.M<br />

4.a<br />

- modifiserte 8513 i går, pluss at jeg satte inn en<br />

10ohms motstand i mitt No1. Filter. Har forresten<br />

bestilt deler til No6. filteret i dag.(gleder meg)<br />

Resultatet av tweakingen er enorm! Må bare takke!<br />

b.<br />

After many more ours of listening to the <strong>clone</strong>s and<br />

the V6 filter, I have come to what will be MY final<br />

filter. Sorry, but I was a little to fast to accept the<br />

filter for the 8535.<br />

<strong>The</strong> V6 filter sort of shows the true nature of the<br />

8535, a hard sound.......<br />

But with the V1 filter too the 8535, and the latest (in<br />

the link) to the 8513 + the modifications with the<br />

tweeter, the sound is the most acceptable ever. I can<br />

still hear the 2000Hz bump but then mostly when I<br />

listen to TV. <strong>The</strong> sound on most recordings now is<br />

warmer than with the V6 filter. But now I can for the<br />

first time totally relax when listen to my favourites.<br />

c.<br />

Dear <strong>clone</strong>rs<br />

I really recommend this modification of the 8513<br />

tweeter. I can promise a sweeter treble. And the<br />

metallic sound is totally gone! In fact the whole<br />

speaker can be as fantastic as people said, from<br />

bottom too the top. I have had big problems<br />

accepting the <strong>clone</strong>`s sound until now. This tweak<br />

together with the v6 filter and I can call this speaker<br />

superior! I agree with Troels that this is the final<br />

version!<br />

d.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is said many strong words about the sound of<br />

the <strong>clone</strong>, but I cant understand how so many people<br />

have accepted the sound of the early <strong>clone</strong>s! I can<br />

imagine Mr. Steward Tyler having a good laugh more<br />

than once! But now He he he.........<br />

Regards from Tor Hauge...Norway

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!