The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA
The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA
The 2.5 clone papers - CCRMA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Notes on the ProAc sound:<br />
Much has been said on the ProAc sound, and this can<br />
be found in all the reviews seen in HIFI magazines,<br />
etc. If we take a look at the frequency response<br />
curves from a number of ProAc Response designs,<br />
this is what we see:<br />
Response 1SC<br />
Response <strong>2.5</strong><br />
Response 3.8<br />
<strong>The</strong> Danish magazine High Fidelity confirms the<br />
response curves seen from the ProAc 1S and 1SC.<br />
Response 1S<br />
Response 1SE<br />
Response 3.5<br />
41<br />
Response 2S<br />
<strong>The</strong> Response 2S is an exception from this profile<br />
and the Response 3.5 is the worst of them all.<br />
Worst??<br />
Well, first let’s take a look at 10 randomly picked<br />
designs from the Stereophile files:<br />
(A few speakers with very peculiar response profiles<br />
have not been considered)
Change language