STATEMENT OF FACTS - University of Illinois Springfield
STATEMENT OF FACTS - University of Illinois Springfield
STATEMENT OF FACTS - University of Illinois Springfield
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
709-11) Dr. Murphy concluded that the bullets came from a small caliber weapon<br />
– most likely a .22. (Vol. LV, R. 715)<br />
James Kreiser was a forensic scientist with the <strong>Illinois</strong> State Police.<br />
Kreiser’s expertise was in firearms. (Vol. LVIX, R. 1602) Kreiser examined the<br />
bullets and bullet fragments in Karyn Slover’s case. (Vol. LVIX, R.1608-09) Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fragments were too damaged for identification. At least four <strong>of</strong> the pieces<br />
were fired from a .22 caliber rim fired gun. The murder weapon could have been<br />
a .22 caliber rifle, semiautomatic pistol or revolver. (Vol. LVIX, R. 1617-18) The<br />
bullets could not have come from a .25 automatic. (Vol. LVIX, R.1628-29)<br />
Several pieces <strong>of</strong> evidence were collected including a partial pant leg from<br />
a jean; plastic bags; socks from the feet; duct tape used to close the bag; the belt<br />
and jeans from the waist area <strong>of</strong> the body; and some red underwear. (Vol. LIV, R.<br />
496-501)<br />
Inside one <strong>of</strong> the bags that contained the hands and forearms <strong>of</strong> Karyn,<br />
Siefferman found a piece <strong>of</strong> broken concrete. (Vol. LIV, R. 501) Another piece <strong>of</strong><br />
concrete was found in the bag containing the right shoulder area <strong>of</strong> the victim.<br />
(Vol. LIV, R. 502) There was also a partial white sleeve found in this bag. (Vol.<br />
LIV, R. 502) Pictures <strong>of</strong> Karyn Slover’s hands showed that some <strong>of</strong> the fingernails<br />
were longer than others and some <strong>of</strong> them appeared to have substances under the<br />
fingernails. The police decided against taking fingernail scrapings. (Vol. LV, R.<br />
620-22)<br />
Prior to showing pictures <strong>of</strong> the dismembered body to the jury defense<br />
counsel objected. Dr. Murphy was asked if the pictures were necessary to<br />
understand his testimony and he stated that he did not need the pictures<br />
although some people might find them helpful. The trial court allowed the<br />
pictures to be published to the jury. (Vol. LV, R. 683-84) The jury was then<br />
-56-