10.04.2013 Views

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ICZ2008 – Abstracts S3<br />

Sexual selection and genital evolution in mammals<br />

Paula Stockley<br />

Mammalian Behaviour & Evolution Group, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary<br />

Science, University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, CH64 7TE, UK.<br />

Animal genitalia evolve rapidly and divergently, with the result that<br />

closely related species <strong>of</strong>ten have conspicuously different genital<br />

anatomy. Following the pioneering work <strong>of</strong> William G. Eberhard,<br />

there is now growing evidence that sexual selection may be largely<br />

responsible for this diversity. In the current presentation I will review<br />

evidence that the genital anatomy <strong>of</strong> male mammals is subject to<br />

sexual selection, with emphasis on understanding diversity in the<br />

relative size <strong>of</strong> particularly variable traits such as penile spines and<br />

the baculum or os penis. After providing a broad overview <strong>of</strong><br />

comparative trends in genital diversity among primates and other<br />

taxa, I will focus on a case study <strong>of</strong> post-copulatory sexual selection<br />

in wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) that provides new<br />

evidence for an association between male genital anatomy and<br />

reproductive success in a mammal. Overall, the evidence presented<br />

indicates that sexual selection is likely to be a significant factor<br />

explaining certain aspects <strong>of</strong> genital evolution in mammals. However,<br />

as for other taxa, distinguishing between alternative models <strong>of</strong><br />

genital evolution by sexual selection may prove a significant<br />

challenge.<br />

- 17 -<br />

Morphological and phylogenetic implications <strong>of</strong> female genitalia<br />

in micronetine spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae)<br />

Lihong Tu 1,2 and Gustavo Hormiga 2<br />

1<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Life <strong>Sciences</strong>, Capital Normal University, Beijing100037,<br />

P. R. China<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biological <strong>Sciences</strong>, The George Washington<br />

University, Washington, DC 20052, USA<br />

The genital morphology <strong>of</strong> spiders provides a rich source <strong>of</strong><br />

phylogenetic data and can help our understanding <strong>of</strong> many issues in<br />

evolutionary biology and phylogenic reconstruction. Male palpal<br />

morphology has played a critical role in phylogenetic studies, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

dominating character data matrices. In contrast, very limited<br />

information is available on the morphological details <strong>of</strong> the female<br />

genitalia (the epigynum). The present paper focuses on the female<br />

genitalia <strong>of</strong> micronetine spiders, a group <strong>of</strong> linyphiids with a very<br />

complex epigyna. We have studied the external and internal<br />

morphology <strong>of</strong> the epigynum <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> more than 30<br />

micronetine genera. A growing body <strong>of</strong> evidence suggests that the<br />

so called ducts used to transmit sperm (copulatory and fertilization<br />

ducts) are furrows derived from integument folds. We try to use this<br />

model to explain variations in different linyphiid groups. A set <strong>of</strong><br />

comparative morphological characters is presented here. We discuss<br />

the phylogenetic implications <strong>of</strong> these new findings and whether<br />

there is coevolution between male and female genitalia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!