10.04.2013 Views

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ICZ2008 – Abstracts S17<br />

Sex differences in cognition<br />

Susan D Healy and Anjanette Harris<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, Kings Buildings, EH3 9JT,<br />

Edinburgh, UK<br />

Tests <strong>of</strong> spatial cognition produce the best substantiated <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purported differences in cognitive abilities between males and<br />

females (mammals). Although there are at least seven extant<br />

hypotheses as to why this sex difference might have evolved,<br />

there are few data to differentiate amongst them. Additionally,<br />

although the difference is always in the male’s favour, even spatial<br />

cognition tests do n! ot always result in a sex difference. There are<br />

at least two hormonal explanations for this, due to the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

sex steroids and stress hormones on cognitive performance. For<br />

example, fluctuations in oestrogen across an oestrous or<br />

menstrual cycle result in lower spatial performance by females, but<br />

only at certain stages <strong>of</strong> that cycle. Female performance will, then,<br />

may be as good as males at some stages <strong>of</strong> the cycle and poorer<br />

at others. Additionally, or alternatively (it is not yet clear), stress<br />

has a differential impact on males and females, such that cognitive<br />

performance in females is typically poorer under acute stress<br />

conditions. We argue that stress, as imposed via the testing<br />

situation (<strong>of</strong>ten a Morris water maze task) may explain the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> sex differences in spatial condition in the laboratory<br />

rat, at least. If so, we suggest that the laboratory rat (and, perhaps<br />

laboratory testing) is not an appropriate model system for<br />

addressing questions on th! e evolution <strong>of</strong> sex differences in<br />

spatial cognition in mammals.<br />

Ecological factors involved within adjustment <strong>of</strong> European<br />

hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) to urbanization<br />

Pauline Hubert 1,2 , Romain Julliard 3 , Sylvie Biagianti 1 and Marie-<br />

2, 4<br />

Lazarine Poulle<br />

1 Laboratoire d’éco-toxicologie, EA 2099, URVVC, Université de<br />

Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51687 Cedex 2 Reims, France<br />

2 Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Eco-éthologie (2C2A-<br />

CERFE), 5 rue de la Héronnière, 08240 Boult-aux-Bois, France<br />

3 Centre de Recherche sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux<br />

(CRBPO), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 55 rue Buffon,<br />

75005 Paris, France<br />

4 Laboratoire de Parasitologie - Mycologie, EA3800, IFR 53,<br />

Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France.<br />

European hedgehog is a wild mammal considered as an "urban<br />

adapter” since it is able to maintain and even increase its<br />

population despite urbanization. Adjustment <strong>of</strong> its populations to<br />

specific conditions <strong>of</strong> the urban environment, especially through an<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> their density, is an important indicator <strong>of</strong> the ecological<br />

plasticity <strong>of</strong> the species. The objective <strong>of</strong> the present study was to<br />

identify the ecological factors responsible for the density <strong>of</strong><br />

hedgehog population being higher in cities than in the countryside.<br />

The study was conducted on a 4213 ha area located in the<br />

Ardennes region, North-eastern France. It includes the Sedan city<br />

(21000 inhabitants) and the neighbouring rural area. Forty three<br />

transects <strong>of</strong> 500m each were spread out on the study area in order<br />

to perform visual catch <strong>of</strong> hedgehog at night, with infrared<br />

binoculars. Transects were walked twelve times from June 2006 to<br />

October 2007, leading to 127 encounters. General Linear Models<br />

(GLM) were built to identify the ecological factors explaining the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> individuals observed per transect. Tested variables<br />

were i) earthworm and arthropod biomass per transect (main food<br />

resource) estimated with sampling methods applied to the 5 types<br />

<strong>of</strong> habitat present in the study area, ii) presence <strong>of</strong> pet food and<br />

anti-slug pellet or pesticides obtained by means <strong>of</strong> a verbal<br />

questionnaire and iii) proximity <strong>of</strong> a badger, Meles meles sett<br />

(hedgehog’s predator). Hedgehog density, estimated from distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> hedgehog localisations to transects, and importance <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

explaining hedgehog presence were then compared between<br />

urban and rural areas.<br />

- 59 -<br />

Some aspects <strong>of</strong> the Great Warbler' behavior in wet land<br />

(Romania)<br />

Constantin Ion<br />

Bd. Carol I, no. 20A, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, 700505, IASI, Romania<br />

The Great Reed Warbler is one <strong>of</strong> the most common warbler form<br />

the wet areas <strong>of</strong> Romania. It can be found especially around the<br />

reeds beds plain and it is visiting our country form spring until<br />

autumn. The spring migration takes place in the second part <strong>of</strong><br />

April. At the end <strong>of</strong> the April –the beginning <strong>of</strong> May, the great reed<br />

warbler males start to delimitate the nesting territories.<br />

These territories cover generally a surface <strong>of</strong> 100-250 m ². The<br />

territoriality behavior can be seen as a form <strong>of</strong> aggression and also<br />

competition, when individuals <strong>of</strong> the same species compete for a<br />

mate and for environmental resources (food, shelter, from<br />

predators, wind and heavy rain).<br />

While delimit the territory these birds manifest the supremacy <strong>of</strong><br />

one warbler to another through emitting complex songs and<br />

showing intimidating positions.<br />

The establishment <strong>of</strong> the warbler territory is closely connected with<br />

the meteorological conditions <strong>of</strong> the environment in which they live.<br />

Rain or low temperatures are the main factors detrimental to the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> territories. These territories can be contiguous<br />

from one warbler to another or buffer spaces may exists between<br />

them. We observed that territories have an opening to grassland<br />

were they catch insects, and another opening towards the open<br />

water were they take shelter, favor the success <strong>of</strong> the reproduction.<br />

The building <strong>of</strong> the nest last 5-6 days, the deposition <strong>of</strong> the eggs<br />

( 4-5 ) takes place 3-6 days (one egg - one day). The female is<br />

hatching 10-14 days. After 30 days the chicks became good flying<br />

and able to have an independent life.<br />

The great reed warbler´s behavior is correlated with the breeding<br />

stage. If the warblers have eggs, they leave the nest when a male<br />

comes around. If the warblers have broods in their nest, they will<br />

become very agitate, aggressive, and will try to sting the male in<br />

order to defend the chicks.<br />

Individual fate within an ant clone: the nature vs. nurture<br />

debate under the microscope<br />

Emmanuel Lecoutey, Fabien Ravary, Nicolas Châline and Pierre<br />

Jaisson<br />

Université Paris 13, Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et<br />

Comparée UMR CNRS 7153, 99 av. JB Clément, 93430-<br />

Villetaneuse, France<br />

The life cycle <strong>of</strong> some insular populations <strong>of</strong> the Asian tropical ant<br />

species Cerapachys biroi Forel is likely to be unique worldwide. In<br />

effect, these populations lost males and queens and maintain<br />

themselves through the workers’ parthenogenesis. Moreover, all<br />

the individual workers oviposit, participate to reproduction, making<br />

copies <strong>of</strong> themselves, at least during the first weeks <strong>of</strong> their adult<br />

life (Ravary & Jaisson, 2004). Eggs are laid altogether in a short<br />

round, which results in a cyclic production <strong>of</strong> generations <strong>of</strong><br />

workers (Ravary & Jaisson, 2002). All workers <strong>of</strong> a same<br />

generation are homogenous concerning age as they hatch<br />

together within in a few hours. The C. biroi callow workers usually<br />

stay within the nest displaying nursing behaviour and then become<br />

foragers while aging. This species feed exclusively on ant brood <strong>of</strong><br />

alien ant species which makes easy to control strictly their diet at<br />

the laboratory. Finally, hierarchy as well as worker polymorphism<br />

(potential causes <strong>of</strong> division <strong>of</strong> labour) are absent within colonies.<br />

These life history characteristics together allowed us to set up an<br />

experimental design in which young workers <strong>of</strong> the same clone<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the same age were reared in the same conditions, except<br />

for the foraging experience: 50% were let to catch preys whereas<br />

50% were not permitted to get a foraging success. Then, the fate<br />

<strong>of</strong> these individuals was dramatically oriented accordingly: those<br />

who experienced foraging successes became foragers and those<br />

who experienced foraging failures turned towards nursing tasks<br />

(Ravary et al. 2007). This direct demonstration <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong><br />

experience in the determinism <strong>of</strong> social behaviour reminds recent<br />

knowledge about cell differentiation within organisms (Chang et al.<br />

2007) and may contribute to revive the superorganismic<br />

conception <strong>of</strong> insect societies (Wilson & Sober 1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!