CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences
CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences
CONTENT - International Society of Zoological Sciences
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ICZ2008 – Abstracts S17<br />
Sex differences in cognition<br />
Susan D Healy and Anjanette Harris<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, Kings Buildings, EH3 9JT,<br />
Edinburgh, UK<br />
Tests <strong>of</strong> spatial cognition produce the best substantiated <strong>of</strong> the<br />
purported differences in cognitive abilities between males and<br />
females (mammals). Although there are at least seven extant<br />
hypotheses as to why this sex difference might have evolved,<br />
there are few data to differentiate amongst them. Additionally,<br />
although the difference is always in the male’s favour, even spatial<br />
cognition tests do n! ot always result in a sex difference. There are<br />
at least two hormonal explanations for this, due to the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
sex steroids and stress hormones on cognitive performance. For<br />
example, fluctuations in oestrogen across an oestrous or<br />
menstrual cycle result in lower spatial performance by females, but<br />
only at certain stages <strong>of</strong> that cycle. Female performance will, then,<br />
may be as good as males at some stages <strong>of</strong> the cycle and poorer<br />
at others. Additionally, or alternatively (it is not yet clear), stress<br />
has a differential impact on males and females, such that cognitive<br />
performance in females is typically poorer under acute stress<br />
conditions. We argue that stress, as imposed via the testing<br />
situation (<strong>of</strong>ten a Morris water maze task) may explain the<br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> sex differences in spatial condition in the laboratory<br />
rat, at least. If so, we suggest that the laboratory rat (and, perhaps<br />
laboratory testing) is not an appropriate model system for<br />
addressing questions on th! e evolution <strong>of</strong> sex differences in<br />
spatial cognition in mammals.<br />
Ecological factors involved within adjustment <strong>of</strong> European<br />
hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) to urbanization<br />
Pauline Hubert 1,2 , Romain Julliard 3 , Sylvie Biagianti 1 and Marie-<br />
2, 4<br />
Lazarine Poulle<br />
1 Laboratoire d’éco-toxicologie, EA 2099, URVVC, Université de<br />
Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51687 Cedex 2 Reims, France<br />
2 Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Eco-éthologie (2C2A-<br />
CERFE), 5 rue de la Héronnière, 08240 Boult-aux-Bois, France<br />
3 Centre de Recherche sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux<br />
(CRBPO), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 55 rue Buffon,<br />
75005 Paris, France<br />
4 Laboratoire de Parasitologie - Mycologie, EA3800, IFR 53,<br />
Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France.<br />
European hedgehog is a wild mammal considered as an "urban<br />
adapter” since it is able to maintain and even increase its<br />
population despite urbanization. Adjustment <strong>of</strong> its populations to<br />
specific conditions <strong>of</strong> the urban environment, especially through an<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> their density, is an important indicator <strong>of</strong> the ecological<br />
plasticity <strong>of</strong> the species. The objective <strong>of</strong> the present study was to<br />
identify the ecological factors responsible for the density <strong>of</strong><br />
hedgehog population being higher in cities than in the countryside.<br />
The study was conducted on a 4213 ha area located in the<br />
Ardennes region, North-eastern France. It includes the Sedan city<br />
(21000 inhabitants) and the neighbouring rural area. Forty three<br />
transects <strong>of</strong> 500m each were spread out on the study area in order<br />
to perform visual catch <strong>of</strong> hedgehog at night, with infrared<br />
binoculars. Transects were walked twelve times from June 2006 to<br />
October 2007, leading to 127 encounters. General Linear Models<br />
(GLM) were built to identify the ecological factors explaining the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> individuals observed per transect. Tested variables<br />
were i) earthworm and arthropod biomass per transect (main food<br />
resource) estimated with sampling methods applied to the 5 types<br />
<strong>of</strong> habitat present in the study area, ii) presence <strong>of</strong> pet food and<br />
anti-slug pellet or pesticides obtained by means <strong>of</strong> a verbal<br />
questionnaire and iii) proximity <strong>of</strong> a badger, Meles meles sett<br />
(hedgehog’s predator). Hedgehog density, estimated from distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> hedgehog localisations to transects, and importance <strong>of</strong> factors<br />
explaining hedgehog presence were then compared between<br />
urban and rural areas.<br />
- 59 -<br />
Some aspects <strong>of</strong> the Great Warbler' behavior in wet land<br />
(Romania)<br />
Constantin Ion<br />
Bd. Carol I, no. 20A, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, 700505, IASI, Romania<br />
The Great Reed Warbler is one <strong>of</strong> the most common warbler form<br />
the wet areas <strong>of</strong> Romania. It can be found especially around the<br />
reeds beds plain and it is visiting our country form spring until<br />
autumn. The spring migration takes place in the second part <strong>of</strong><br />
April. At the end <strong>of</strong> the April –the beginning <strong>of</strong> May, the great reed<br />
warbler males start to delimitate the nesting territories.<br />
These territories cover generally a surface <strong>of</strong> 100-250 m ². The<br />
territoriality behavior can be seen as a form <strong>of</strong> aggression and also<br />
competition, when individuals <strong>of</strong> the same species compete for a<br />
mate and for environmental resources (food, shelter, from<br />
predators, wind and heavy rain).<br />
While delimit the territory these birds manifest the supremacy <strong>of</strong><br />
one warbler to another through emitting complex songs and<br />
showing intimidating positions.<br />
The establishment <strong>of</strong> the warbler territory is closely connected with<br />
the meteorological conditions <strong>of</strong> the environment in which they live.<br />
Rain or low temperatures are the main factors detrimental to the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> territories. These territories can be contiguous<br />
from one warbler to another or buffer spaces may exists between<br />
them. We observed that territories have an opening to grassland<br />
were they catch insects, and another opening towards the open<br />
water were they take shelter, favor the success <strong>of</strong> the reproduction.<br />
The building <strong>of</strong> the nest last 5-6 days, the deposition <strong>of</strong> the eggs<br />
( 4-5 ) takes place 3-6 days (one egg - one day). The female is<br />
hatching 10-14 days. After 30 days the chicks became good flying<br />
and able to have an independent life.<br />
The great reed warbler´s behavior is correlated with the breeding<br />
stage. If the warblers have eggs, they leave the nest when a male<br />
comes around. If the warblers have broods in their nest, they will<br />
become very agitate, aggressive, and will try to sting the male in<br />
order to defend the chicks.<br />
Individual fate within an ant clone: the nature vs. nurture<br />
debate under the microscope<br />
Emmanuel Lecoutey, Fabien Ravary, Nicolas Châline and Pierre<br />
Jaisson<br />
Université Paris 13, Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et<br />
Comparée UMR CNRS 7153, 99 av. JB Clément, 93430-<br />
Villetaneuse, France<br />
The life cycle <strong>of</strong> some insular populations <strong>of</strong> the Asian tropical ant<br />
species Cerapachys biroi Forel is likely to be unique worldwide. In<br />
effect, these populations lost males and queens and maintain<br />
themselves through the workers’ parthenogenesis. Moreover, all<br />
the individual workers oviposit, participate to reproduction, making<br />
copies <strong>of</strong> themselves, at least during the first weeks <strong>of</strong> their adult<br />
life (Ravary & Jaisson, 2004). Eggs are laid altogether in a short<br />
round, which results in a cyclic production <strong>of</strong> generations <strong>of</strong><br />
workers (Ravary & Jaisson, 2002). All workers <strong>of</strong> a same<br />
generation are homogenous concerning age as they hatch<br />
together within in a few hours. The C. biroi callow workers usually<br />
stay within the nest displaying nursing behaviour and then become<br />
foragers while aging. This species feed exclusively on ant brood <strong>of</strong><br />
alien ant species which makes easy to control strictly their diet at<br />
the laboratory. Finally, hierarchy as well as worker polymorphism<br />
(potential causes <strong>of</strong> division <strong>of</strong> labour) are absent within colonies.<br />
These life history characteristics together allowed us to set up an<br />
experimental design in which young workers <strong>of</strong> the same clone<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the same age were reared in the same conditions, except<br />
for the foraging experience: 50% were let to catch preys whereas<br />
50% were not permitted to get a foraging success. Then, the fate<br />
<strong>of</strong> these individuals was dramatically oriented accordingly: those<br />
who experienced foraging successes became foragers and those<br />
who experienced foraging failures turned towards nursing tasks<br />
(Ravary et al. 2007). This direct demonstration <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong><br />
experience in the determinism <strong>of</strong> social behaviour reminds recent<br />
knowledge about cell differentiation within organisms (Chang et al.<br />
2007) and may contribute to revive the superorganismic<br />
conception <strong>of</strong> insect societies (Wilson & Sober 1989).