10.04.2013 Views

The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)

The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)

The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as long as wide, inferior margin with 3 RS (set as and<br />

2), superior distal angle with 2 slender setae, inferior<br />

distal angle with 3 RS.<br />

Penes medially united; penial process 0.4 times as<br />

long as basal width.<br />

Pleopod 1 exopod .4 times as long as wide, distally<br />

broadly rounded, lateral margin straight, mesial<br />

margin strongly convex, with PMS on distal half,<br />

with ~58 PMS; endopod .9 times as long as wide,<br />

distally subtruncate, lateral margin weakly concave,<br />

with PMS on distal margin only, mesial margin with<br />

PMS on distal one-third, endopod with ~40 PMS; peduncle<br />

.7 times as wide as long, mesial margin with<br />

8 coupling hooks. Pleopod 2 exopod with ~88 PMS,<br />

endopod with ~60 PMS; appendix masculina basally<br />

swollen, 0.7 times as long as endopod, distally acute.<br />

Pleopod 3 exopod with ~ 00 PMS, endopod with ~27<br />

PMS. Pleopod 4 exopod with ~90 PMS, endopod with<br />

~25 PMS. Pleopod 5 exopod with ~72 PMS. Exopods <strong>of</strong><br />

pleopods –3 each with distolateral margin not digitate;<br />

endopods <strong>of</strong> pleopods 3–5 each with distolateral<br />

point; pleopods 2–4 peduncle distolateral margin with<br />

prominent acute RS.<br />

Uropod peduncle posterior lobe about three-<br />

quarters as long as endopod. Uropod rami extending<br />

to pleotelson apex, apices acute. Endopod apically not<br />

bifid, lateral margin straight, without prominent ex-<br />

cision, proximal lateral margin with 0 RS, distal lateral<br />

margin with 2 RS, mesial margin sinuate, with 7 RS.<br />

Exopod not extending to end <strong>of</strong> endopod, 3.0 times as<br />

long as greatest width, apically not bifid; lateral margin<br />

weakly convex, with 9 RS; mesial margin straight,<br />

distally convex, with 4 RS.<br />

femaLe: More ovate than male; lacks the transverse<br />

ridge on pereonite 2; lacks dorsal nodules except on<br />

the pleotelson, where they are present though smaller<br />

than in the male.<br />

size: Adults measure between 4.4 and 8.0 mm; the<br />

single manca was 6.0 mm.<br />

Variation: <strong>The</strong> small number (4) <strong>of</strong> mature adult specimens<br />

means that it is not possible to precisely detail<br />

the variation. <strong>The</strong> pleotelson has from about 4 to 6 RS.<br />

<strong>The</strong> uropod endopod lateral margin has 2 distal RS,<br />

the mesial margin 6 or 7 RS for adults (5 in the manca);<br />

the exopod lateral margin has 9 or 0 RS (8 and 9 in<br />

the manca), the mesial margin 4 RS (3 in the manca).<br />

<strong>The</strong> RS on the merus <strong>of</strong> pereopods –3 appear to be<br />

constant but could not be readily discerned in the two<br />

smallest specimens.<br />

Body shape varies a little, with the adult male from<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> having subparallel lateral margins (2.4<br />

times as long as wide), while the male holotype and<br />

non-ovigerous female were both wider and more ovate<br />

(2.3 times as long as wide).<br />

6<br />

remarks: This is a distinctive species, males being readily<br />

recognised by the fine nodules along the posterior<br />

margins <strong>of</strong> the posterior pereonites and pleonites, presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> numerous small spines on the dorsal surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pleotelson and medially fused penial processes.<br />

Females can be recognised by the presence <strong>of</strong> reduced<br />

spines on the pleotelson and the characteristic setation<br />

and shape <strong>of</strong> the uropod rami and posterior margin <strong>of</strong><br />

the pleotelson.<br />

<strong>The</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> the eyes is unusual within the genus<br />

in that they are noticeably anterior in position (rather<br />

than ventral), appearing somewhat bulbous and almost<br />

entirely filling the anterior margin <strong>of</strong> the head in<br />

dorsal view. <strong>The</strong> propodus <strong>of</strong> pereopod is distinctive<br />

in having a prominent and acute robust seta opposing<br />

the base <strong>of</strong> the dactylus. In most <strong>Aegidae</strong> there is no<br />

such seta at this position.<br />

Epulaega monilis (Barnard, 9 4) is closely similar<br />

to Epulaega fracta, but can be distinguished by lacking<br />

spines on the dorsal surface <strong>of</strong> the pleotelson in<br />

both males and females, the nodules on the posterior<br />

margins <strong>of</strong> the pleonites are larger (particularly the<br />

median nodules) and extend to the anterior pereonites,<br />

and the uropodal exopod is as long as the endopod (a<br />

little shorter in E. fracta).<br />

prey: One specimen from Hyperoglyphe antarctica (Carmichael,<br />

8 9) [bluenose and matiri (<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>) or<br />

Antarctic butterfish, Centrolophidae].<br />

distribution: Southwestern Pacific, <strong>of</strong>f Tasmania and<br />

southern Queensland; <strong>of</strong>f Great Barrier Island, North<br />

Island and Kaikoura, South Island, both on the east<br />

coast <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>; at a recorded depth <strong>of</strong> 400–500<br />

metres.<br />

Genus Rocinela Leach, 8 8<br />

Rocinela Leach, 8 8: 349.– Desmarest, 825:304.– Milne<br />

Edwards, 840: 243.– Dana, 852: 304*.– Bate &<br />

Westwood, 867: 289.– Schioedte & Meinert: 879b: 380.–<br />

Gerstaecker, 882: 227.– Haswell, 882: 285.– Stebbing,<br />

893: 348; 905: 23.– Sars, 897: 65.– Richardson, 898:<br />

8; 905a: 90.– Barnard, 9 4: 368; 936: 59.– Hale,<br />

925: 82.– Menzies, 962: 8.– Menzies & Glynn,<br />

968: 45.– Menzies & George, 972: 2.– Kensley, 978:<br />

59.– Kussakin, 979: 25 .– Menzies & Kruczynski, 983:<br />

62.– Brusca, 980: 229.– Bruce, 983: 778.– Brusca &<br />

Iverson, 985: 42.– Brusca & France, 992: 236.– Kensley &<br />

Schotte, 989: 9.– Bruce, Lew Ton & Poore, 2002: 63.<br />

Acherusia Lucas, 849: 78.– Dana, 852: 304* (type species<br />

Acherusia dumerilii Lucas, 849).<br />

Acherousia.– Schioedte & Meinert, 879b: 380 (lapsus).<br />

Rocinella.– Bate, 878 : 65 (lapsus).<br />

Not Rocinela.– Bovallius 885: 4 (= Syscenus Harger, 880).<br />

type speCies: Rocinela danmoniensis Leach, 8 8, by<br />

monotypy.<br />

* <strong>The</strong>re is a pagination error in this publication, with page<br />

304 printed as 204.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!