The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)
The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)
The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
as long as wide, inferior margin with 3 RS (set as and<br />
2), superior distal angle with 2 slender setae, inferior<br />
distal angle with 3 RS.<br />
Penes medially united; penial process 0.4 times as<br />
long as basal width.<br />
Pleopod 1 exopod .4 times as long as wide, distally<br />
broadly rounded, lateral margin straight, mesial<br />
margin strongly convex, with PMS on distal half,<br />
with ~58 PMS; endopod .9 times as long as wide,<br />
distally subtruncate, lateral margin weakly concave,<br />
with PMS on distal margin only, mesial margin with<br />
PMS on distal one-third, endopod with ~40 PMS; peduncle<br />
.7 times as wide as long, mesial margin with<br />
8 coupling hooks. Pleopod 2 exopod with ~88 PMS,<br />
endopod with ~60 PMS; appendix masculina basally<br />
swollen, 0.7 times as long as endopod, distally acute.<br />
Pleopod 3 exopod with ~ 00 PMS, endopod with ~27<br />
PMS. Pleopod 4 exopod with ~90 PMS, endopod with<br />
~25 PMS. Pleopod 5 exopod with ~72 PMS. Exopods <strong>of</strong><br />
pleopods –3 each with distolateral margin not digitate;<br />
endopods <strong>of</strong> pleopods 3–5 each with distolateral<br />
point; pleopods 2–4 peduncle distolateral margin with<br />
prominent acute RS.<br />
Uropod peduncle posterior lobe about three-<br />
quarters as long as endopod. Uropod rami extending<br />
to pleotelson apex, apices acute. Endopod apically not<br />
bifid, lateral margin straight, without prominent ex-<br />
cision, proximal lateral margin with 0 RS, distal lateral<br />
margin with 2 RS, mesial margin sinuate, with 7 RS.<br />
Exopod not extending to end <strong>of</strong> endopod, 3.0 times as<br />
long as greatest width, apically not bifid; lateral margin<br />
weakly convex, with 9 RS; mesial margin straight,<br />
distally convex, with 4 RS.<br />
femaLe: More ovate than male; lacks the transverse<br />
ridge on pereonite 2; lacks dorsal nodules except on<br />
the pleotelson, where they are present though smaller<br />
than in the male.<br />
size: Adults measure between 4.4 and 8.0 mm; the<br />
single manca was 6.0 mm.<br />
Variation: <strong>The</strong> small number (4) <strong>of</strong> mature adult specimens<br />
means that it is not possible to precisely detail<br />
the variation. <strong>The</strong> pleotelson has from about 4 to 6 RS.<br />
<strong>The</strong> uropod endopod lateral margin has 2 distal RS,<br />
the mesial margin 6 or 7 RS for adults (5 in the manca);<br />
the exopod lateral margin has 9 or 0 RS (8 and 9 in<br />
the manca), the mesial margin 4 RS (3 in the manca).<br />
<strong>The</strong> RS on the merus <strong>of</strong> pereopods –3 appear to be<br />
constant but could not be readily discerned in the two<br />
smallest specimens.<br />
Body shape varies a little, with the adult male from<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> having subparallel lateral margins (2.4<br />
times as long as wide), while the male holotype and<br />
non-ovigerous female were both wider and more ovate<br />
(2.3 times as long as wide).<br />
6<br />
remarks: This is a distinctive species, males being readily<br />
recognised by the fine nodules along the posterior<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> the posterior pereonites and pleonites, presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> numerous small spines on the dorsal surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pleotelson and medially fused penial processes.<br />
Females can be recognised by the presence <strong>of</strong> reduced<br />
spines on the pleotelson and the characteristic setation<br />
and shape <strong>of</strong> the uropod rami and posterior margin <strong>of</strong><br />
the pleotelson.<br />
<strong>The</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> the eyes is unusual within the genus<br />
in that they are noticeably anterior in position (rather<br />
than ventral), appearing somewhat bulbous and almost<br />
entirely filling the anterior margin <strong>of</strong> the head in<br />
dorsal view. <strong>The</strong> propodus <strong>of</strong> pereopod is distinctive<br />
in having a prominent and acute robust seta opposing<br />
the base <strong>of</strong> the dactylus. In most <strong>Aegidae</strong> there is no<br />
such seta at this position.<br />
Epulaega monilis (Barnard, 9 4) is closely similar<br />
to Epulaega fracta, but can be distinguished by lacking<br />
spines on the dorsal surface <strong>of</strong> the pleotelson in<br />
both males and females, the nodules on the posterior<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> the pleonites are larger (particularly the<br />
median nodules) and extend to the anterior pereonites,<br />
and the uropodal exopod is as long as the endopod (a<br />
little shorter in E. fracta).<br />
prey: One specimen from Hyperoglyphe antarctica (Carmichael,<br />
8 9) [bluenose and matiri (<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>) or<br />
Antarctic butterfish, Centrolophidae].<br />
distribution: Southwestern Pacific, <strong>of</strong>f Tasmania and<br />
southern Queensland; <strong>of</strong>f Great Barrier Island, North<br />
Island and Kaikoura, South Island, both on the east<br />
coast <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>; at a recorded depth <strong>of</strong> 400–500<br />
metres.<br />
Genus Rocinela Leach, 8 8<br />
Rocinela Leach, 8 8: 349.– Desmarest, 825:304.– Milne<br />
Edwards, 840: 243.– Dana, 852: 304*.– Bate &<br />
Westwood, 867: 289.– Schioedte & Meinert: 879b: 380.–<br />
Gerstaecker, 882: 227.– Haswell, 882: 285.– Stebbing,<br />
893: 348; 905: 23.– Sars, 897: 65.– Richardson, 898:<br />
8; 905a: 90.– Barnard, 9 4: 368; 936: 59.– Hale,<br />
925: 82.– Menzies, 962: 8.– Menzies & Glynn,<br />
968: 45.– Menzies & George, 972: 2.– Kensley, 978:<br />
59.– Kussakin, 979: 25 .– Menzies & Kruczynski, 983:<br />
62.– Brusca, 980: 229.– Bruce, 983: 778.– Brusca &<br />
Iverson, 985: 42.– Brusca & France, 992: 236.– Kensley &<br />
Schotte, 989: 9.– Bruce, Lew Ton & Poore, 2002: 63.<br />
Acherusia Lucas, 849: 78.– Dana, 852: 304* (type species<br />
Acherusia dumerilii Lucas, 849).<br />
Acherousia.– Schioedte & Meinert, 879b: 380 (lapsus).<br />
Rocinella.– Bate, 878 : 65 (lapsus).<br />
Not Rocinela.– Bovallius 885: 4 (= Syscenus Harger, 880).<br />
type speCies: Rocinela danmoniensis Leach, 8 8, by<br />
monotypy.<br />
* <strong>The</strong>re is a pagination error in this publication, with page<br />
304 printed as 204.