Figure 125. Rocinela runga sp. nov. Holotype. A–C, pereopods , 2 and 7 respectively; D, pereopod , merus, distal inferior margin; E, pereopod , propodus, distal inferior margin, F, pereopod 2 ischium, mesial angle; G, pereopod 7, distal margin <strong>of</strong> carpus, mesial RS; H, uropod; I, uropodal exopod, ventral view. Variation: <strong>The</strong> uropodal endopod mesial margin had 4 and 6 robust setae, lateral margin 4 and 5 robust setae. remarks: Rocinela runga sp. nov. can be identified by the ovate body shape, relatively small and widely separated eyes, smoothly narrowed rostrum, very long (longer than pereopod 7) and slender pereopod 92 , pereopods –3 without a propodal blade and by the relatively narrow uropodal rami. Rocinela leptopus sp. nov. is the only other similar species, with a similar pereopodal, pleotelson and uropod morphology. <strong>The</strong> two species are readily separated by R. runga having a more elongate pereopod , pereopod dactylus distally curved (proximally curved in R. leptopus), more slender pereopods 2 and
3, and uropodal rami that are relatively wider (exopod 3.4 times as long as wide) than in R. leptopus (exopod 4.0 times as long as wide) and which fail to exceed the posterior margin <strong>of</strong> the pleotelson (just exceeding the posterior margin <strong>of</strong> the pleotelson in R. leptopus. prey: Not known. distribution: Known only from <strong>of</strong>f the Antipodes Islands, eastern Campbell Plateau, southeast <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>. etymoLogy: Runga is a Mäori word meaning south (location) alluding to the southern location (noun in apposition). Rocinela satagia sp. nov. (Figs 26– 29) materiaL examined: Holotype, ♂ (25 mm) Chatham Rise, 43°49.605’S, 78°29.284’E, 9 October 200 , 454 m, coll. RV Tangaroa (NIWA 23856). Paratypes: 2♀ (non-ovig. 2 [dissected], 8.5 mm,), same data as holotype (NIWA 23857). ♀ (2 mm, non-ovig.), Chatham Rise, 43.7033°S, 79.9 7°E, no date, stn. Q4a, 398 m, medium Agassiz trawl (NIWA 23858). ♂ (20 mm), eastern Chatham Rise, 44°09.60’S, 79° 4.20’W, 7 March 978, 320 m, stn Q20 (NIWA 23859). ♂ (2 mm), <strong>of</strong>f East Otago coast, South Island, 45°45.4’S, 7 °05.0’E, 6 August 955, 584 m, canyon B, M.V. Alert (NMNZ Cr. 2007). ♂ ( 8.5 mm), ♀ (ovig 24 mm), manca (7.5 mm), eastern Chatham Rise, 43°44.92’–44°0 .60’S, 79°00.34–0 .60’W, 8 September 989, 397–399 m, stn V365, (NIWA 23860). Manca ( 2.0 mm), eastern Chatham Rise, 44°05.50’S, 79°06.00’W, February 968, 322 m, stn G0327 (NIWA 2386 ). Other material: ♀ ( 9 mm, ovig., poor condition), c. 43 km southeast <strong>of</strong> Cape Campbell, 4 °55.9’S, 4 °43.2’E, 4 January 979, 454–424 m, stn BS668 (= NZOI stn R26), RV Tangaroa (NIWA 23880). ♀ ( 8 mm, ovig.), 43.5328–5348°S, 79.6280–6257°E, 6 June 2006, 375–38 m (NIWA 25669). ♀ ( 3.0 mm, non-ovig), Pegasus Canyon, Pegasus Bay, 43° 4’S, 73°39’E, 29 September 976, BS559, 006–5 2 m, coral, coll. RV Acheron (NMNZ Cr. 2008). Manca? (8.5 mm, poor condition), Pegasus Canyon, Pegasus Bay, 43°30.0’S, 73°3 .3’E, 27 September 976, BS558, 446 m, mud, coll. RV Acheron (NMNZ Cr. 2009). desCription: Body 2.0 times as long as greatest width, dorsal surfaces smooth, widest at pereonite 5, lateral margins weakly ovate. Rostrum basally expanded, tricornered. Eyes not medially united, separated by about 27% width <strong>of</strong> head; each eye made up <strong>of</strong> ~ 0 transverse rows <strong>of</strong> ommatidia, each row with ~8 ommatidia; eye colour dark brown. Coxae 2–3 each with posteroventral angle right-angled (coxae 3 rounded); 5–7 without oblique carina. Pleon with pleonite largely concealed by pereonite 7; pleonite 4 with posterolateral margins extending clearly beyond posterior margin <strong>of</strong> pleonite 5; pleonite 5 with posterolateral angles rounded. Pleotelson 0.8 times as long as anterior width, anterior dorsal surface without 2 sub-median depressions, dorsal surface smooth; lateral margins convex, posterior margin narrowly rounded, with 8– 0 RS. Antennule peduncle article 3 0.8 times as long as combined lengths <strong>of</strong> articles and 2, 3.4 times as long as wide; flagellum with 6 articles, extending to anterior <strong>of</strong> pereonite . Antenna peduncle article 3 .3 times as long as article 2, .2 times as long as wide; article 4 .5 times as long as article 3, .8 times as long as wide, inferior margin with 0 plumose setae, and simple setae; article 5 .5 times as long as article 4, 2.9 times as long as wide, inferior margin with 2 setae (palmate), anterodistal angle with cluster <strong>of</strong> 3 short simple setae; flagellum with 14 articles, extending to middle <strong>of</strong> pereonite 2. Frontal lamina longer than greatest width, anteriorly rounded. Mandible molar process distinct flat lobe; palp article 2 with 7 marginal distolateral setae (finely biserrate), and 3 long distolateral setae; palp article 3 with 6 setae (terminal 2 longest). Maxillule with 5 RS ( large, 4 slender). Maxilla mesial lobe with 2 hooked RS; lateral lobe with hooked RS. Maxilliped palp article distomesial angle with 3 RS (slender, straight); article 2 with 3 hooked RS; article 3 with hooked RS. Pereopod 1 basis 2.8 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.5 times as long as basis, inferior margin with 0 RS, superior distal margin with 2 setae (and RS); merus inferior margin with 3 RS (set as + 2), set as two groups, superior distal angle with 4 setae (including RS); carpus 0.6 times as long as merus, inferior margin with RS; propodus .7 times as long as proximal width, propodal palm with blade, propodal blade 0.7 times as wide as palm, with numerous setae, inferior margin with 5 RS; dactylus .3 times as long as propodus. Pereopods 2 and 3 similar to pereopod . Pereopod 6 similar to pereopod 7. Pereopod 7 basis 3.9 times as long as greatest width, inferior margins with 2 palmate setae (most rubbed away); ischium 0.8 as long as basis, inferior margin with 6 RS (set as , , , 2, ), superior distal angle with 6 RS, inferior distal angle with 5 RS; merus 0.5 times as long as ischium, 2.0 as long as wide, inferior margin with 2 RS (set singly), superior distal angle with 7 RS, inferior distal angle with 5 RS; carpus 0.5 times as long as ischium, 2.4 times as long as wide, inferior margin with 2 RS (set singly), superior distal angle with RS, inferior distal angle with 7 RS; propodus 0.4 as long as ischium, 3.5 times as long as wide, inferior margin with 2 RS (set singly), superior distal angle with 3 slender setae ( palmate), inferior distal angle with 3 RS. 93
- Page 1 and 2:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATM
- Page 3 and 4:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATM
- Page 5 and 6:
cONtENts ABSTRACT .................
- Page 7 and 8:
The isopod fauna of New Zealand has
- Page 9 and 10:
mAtErIAl ExAmINEd Material examined
- Page 11 and 12:
end on preservation, rendering appa
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 3. Terms used in description
- Page 15 and 16:
y the fact that while some species
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 4. Clades in Aega: Strict co
- Page 19 and 20:
parallel lateral margins (Ch 28.2)
- Page 21 and 22:
CharaCter List for AegA body charac
- Page 23 and 24:
Traditionally the Aegidae have been
- Page 25 and 26:
subOrdEr cymOthOIdA wägElE, 1989 B
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Body dorsally compressed; fronta
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 8. Aega falklandica Kussakin
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 10. Aega falklandica Kussaki
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 11. Aega falklandica Kussaki
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 12. Aega komai Bruce, 996. N
- Page 37 and 38:
size: Female 26 mm, two males 6.5 a
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 15. Aega monophthalma Johnst
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 16. Aega monophthalma Johnst
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 18. Aega monophthalma Johnst
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 19. Aega semicarinata Miers,
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 21. Aega semicarinata Miers,
- Page 49 and 50:
pod 2.2 times as long as wide, dist
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 23. Aega stevelowei sp. nov.
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 25. Aega stevelowei sp. nov.
- Page 55 and 56:
4 teeth), lateral margin straight,
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 28. Aega urotoma Barnard, 9
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 30. Aega urotoma Barnard, 9
- Page 61 and 62:
Aega whanui sp. nov. (Figs 3 -33) m
- Page 63 and 64:
Figure 32. Aega whanui sp. nov. Hol
- Page 65 and 66:
distribution: Lord Howe Rise to the
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 34. Aegapheles alazon (Bruce
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 35. Aegapheles birubi (Bruce
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 36. Aegapheles copidis sp. n
- Page 73 and 74:
Variation: The left and right uropo
- Page 75 and 76:
endopod. Uropod rami with apices br
- Page 77 and 78:
Figure 40. Aegapheles mahana sp. no
- Page 79 and 80:
teral margin not digitate; endopods
- Page 81 and 82:
tenna peduncle article 2 inferior s
- Page 83 and 84:
as ischium, .8 times as long as wid
- Page 85 and 86:
Aegiochus beri (Bruce, 983), comb.
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 45. Aegiochus beri (Bruce, 1
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 46. Aegiochus bertrandi sp.
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 48. Aegiochus bertrandi sp.
- Page 93 and 94:
Aegiochus coroo (Bruce, 983), comb.
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 50. Aegiochus coroo (Bruce,
- Page 97 and 98:
size: Males 8.5- 3.0 mm (mean = .4,
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 53. Aegiochus gordoni sp. no
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 55. Aegiochus gordoni sp. no
- Page 103 and 104:
New figures of the holotypes of Aeg
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 57. Aegiochus insomnis sp. n
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 59. Aegiochus insomnis sp. n
- Page 109 and 110:
distribution: Known only from the P
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 62. Aegiochus kakai sp. nov.
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 64. Aegiochus kakai sp. nov.
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 65. Aegiochus kanohi sp. nov
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 67. Aegiochus kanohi sp. nov
- Page 119 and 120:
of ischium-carpus with short RS. Pe
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 69. Aegiochus laevis (Studer
- Page 123 and 124:
southwestern or western Pacific; re
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 72. Aegiochus nohinohi sp. n
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 74. Aegiochus nohinohi sp. n
- Page 129 and 130:
33°47-44’S, 5 °59’- 52°0 ’
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 76. Aegiochus piihuka sp. no
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 78. Aegiochus piihuka sp. no
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 79. Aegiochus pushkini (Kuss
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 81. Aegiochus pushkini (Kuss
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 83. Aegiochus pushkini (Kuss
- Page 141 and 142: Aegiochus riwha sp. nov. (Figs 84-8
- Page 143 and 144: Figure 85. Aegiochus riwha sp. nov.
- Page 145 and 146: Figure 87. Aegiochus riwha sp. nov.
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 88. Aegiochus tara sp. nov.
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 90. Aegiochus tara sp. nov.
- Page 151 and 152: uropods, and the elongate and flat
- Page 153 and 154: Figure 92. Epulaega derkoma sp. nov
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 94. Epulaega derkoma sp. nov
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 96. Epulaega fracta (Hale, 9
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 98. Epulaega fracta (Hale, 9
- Page 161 and 162: as long as wide, inferior margin wi
- Page 163 and 164: Rocinela bonita sp. nov. (Figs 00-
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 101. Rocinela bonita sp. nov
- Page 167 and 168: Figure 103. Rocinela bonita sp. nov
- Page 169 and 170: 3, more strongly produced uropod pe
- Page 171 and 172: Figure 106. Rocinela garricki Hurle
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 108. Rocinela garricki Hurle
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 110. Rocinela leptopus sp. n
- Page 177 and 178: Figure 112. Rocinela leptopus sp. n
- Page 179 and 180: Figure 114. Rocinela pakari sp. nov
- Page 181 and 182: Figure 116. Rocinela pakari sp. nov
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 118. Rocinela pakari sp. nov
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 119. Rocinela resima sp. nov
- Page 187 and 188: Figure 121. Rocinela resima sp. nov
- Page 189 and 190: Variation: Based on the four type s
- Page 191: Figure 124. Rocinela runga sp. nov.
- Page 195 and 196: Figure 127. Rocinela satagia sp. no
- Page 197 and 198: Figure 129. Rocinela satagia sp. no
- Page 199 and 200: genus Aega (e.g. A. falklandica, A.
- Page 201 and 202: Figure 131. Syscenus kapoo sp. nov.
- Page 203 and 204: Figure 132. Syscenus latus Richards
- Page 205 and 206: Figure 134. Syscenus latus Richards
- Page 207 and 208: Figure 135. Syscenus moana Bruce, 2
- Page 209 and 210: Figure 136. Syscenus springthorpei
- Page 211 and 212: evision of the species based on goo
- Page 213 and 214: a nomen nudum in a footnote, by Kr
- Page 215 and 216: Rocinela insularis Schioedte & Mein
- Page 217 and 218: Figure 137. Aegiochus antarctica (H
- Page 219 and 220: flattened antennule peduncle articl
- Page 221 and 222: 0 acute RS (2 simple setae); carpus
- Page 223 and 224: AMAR, R.; ROMAN, M.-L. 974: Invert
- Page 225 and 226: DOLLFUS, A. 89 : Crustacés Isopode
- Page 227 and 228: KUSSAKIN, O.G.; VASINA, G.S. 982: A
- Page 229 and 230: ROHDE, K. 2005: Marine Parasitology
- Page 231 and 232: AppENdIx 1. INvAlId AEgId NAmEs Inc
- Page 233 and 234: Figure 139. Aega angustata Whiteleg
- Page 235 and 236: of the uropodal exopod lacking serr
- Page 237 and 238: present this record can only be con
- Page 239 and 240: Figure 143. Aegiochus plebeia (Hans
- Page 241 and 242: posterior margin (rather than conve
- Page 243 and 244:
H Figure 146. Syscenus intermedius
- Page 245 and 246:
Aegiochus aff. tara: ♀ (ovig. 27
- Page 247 and 248:
magnifica 1122112411 2213124211 131
- Page 249 and 250:
Aega, 7, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 27, 98 Aega
- Page 251 and 252:
Greenland, 2 2, 2 3, 2 5 Greenland