Truscott Research Fax Pro forma - City of Norwood Payneham and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

99% of users of the system were able to name something that should go into the Bio Baskets. 14% (10) of non-users were not able to name anything, with a further 13% (9) of this segment unable to nominate anything more specific than ‘food scraps’. PRELIMINARY REPORT Page 16
Placement of Bio Basket bags Those respondents who were aware of the pilot (554) were asked to say where the bags are supposed to be placed when full. The great majority of these respondents - 93% - were correct in saying that the bags should go in the green kerbside organics bin. Awareness of the correct place for the full compostable bags for tenants (90%) was still relatively high, and it was only below par amongst nonusers (75%). % of respondents aware of trial 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% PLACE FULL BAGS IN GREEN ORGANICS BIN 93% ALL 96% User Non-user 7% of respondents gave other answers. 75% traditional 95% other/units,flats 89% 1% thought the Bio Basket bags should go in the compost bin and another 1% indicated they should go in the garden. 2% thought the bags should go in the recycling bin. 1% thought they should go in the residual waste bin. 3% of respondents did not know where the bags should go. These results were consistent across all other subgroups. PRELIMINARY REPORT Page 17
Page 1 and 2: ZERO WASTE SA BIO BASKET PILOT SURV
Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION Truscott Research was
Page 5 and 6: PATTERNS OF USE 85% (482) of all r
Page 7 and 8: All respondents who had used the sy
Page 9 and 10: BARRIERS TO USING THE SYSTEM AND DI
Page 11 and 12: SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS A total of 5
Page 13 and 14: In each of the households included
Page 15 and 16: six or more five four three two one
Page 17: Types of waste used for Bio Basket
Page 21 and 22: DISPOSE OF LAWN CLIPPINGS AND GARDE
Page 23 and 24: Use of green kerbside organics bin
Page 25 and 26: Increased level of awareness Respon
Page 27 and 28: Reasons for not using the Bio Baske
Page 29 and 30: Reasons for stopping use of the Bio
Page 31 and 32: Another way of looking at usage is
Page 33 and 34: Difficulty in using Bio Basket syst
Page 35 and 36: Household use of the Bio Basket sys
Page 37 and 38: 83% of former users cited problems
Page 39 and 40: INCIDENCE OF CAPACITY ISSUES FORTNI
Page 41 and 42: RATING - EXISTING 3 BIN SYSTEM [MEA
Page 43 and 44: RATING - BIO BASKET SYSTEM [MEAN SC
Page 45 and 46: RATING - COLLECTION FREQUENCY RESID
Page 47 and 48: RATING - COLLECTION FREQUENCY - GRE
Page 49 and 50: Predicted future use of Bio Basket
Page 51 and 52: Cost perceptions All respondents we
Page 53 and 54: Respondents were invited to comment
Page 55 and 56: Predicted future use - if 150 bags
Page 57: BASKET ISSUES Need a stronger bask

Truscott Research Fax Pro forma - City of Norwood Payneham and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?