24.04.2013 Views

impact of farmers' organic farming practices on soil properties in ...

impact of farmers' organic farming practices on soil properties in ...

impact of farmers' organic farming practices on soil properties in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In kharif jowar based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two <strong>soil</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

available potassium c<strong>on</strong>tent from 579 to 606 kg per ha and 560 to 580 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> surface<br />

and subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s, respectively. The average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

worked to 4.70 per cent <strong>in</strong> surface <strong>soil</strong> and 3.60 per cent <strong>in</strong> subsurface <strong>soil</strong>. The highest<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium c<strong>on</strong>tent was observed <strong>in</strong> K 1 farmer (4.33%).<br />

The average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three <strong>soil</strong>s under rabi jowar based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong>dicated an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> potassium <strong>in</strong> both surface and subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s (542 to 560 kg/ha and 529 to 544<br />

kg/ha, respectively). The average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium <strong>in</strong> surface and subsurface <strong>soil</strong> was<br />

3.32 per cent and 2.83 per cent, respectively. Am<strong>on</strong>g three <strong>soil</strong>s, <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> R 1 farmer showed a<br />

highest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium (3.83%) due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

In sugarcane based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, available K2O c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s under <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

farms ranged from 584 (S2) to 608 (S3) kg per ha, while it ranged from 561 (S2) to 581 (S1) kg<br />

per ha <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al farms. On an average, the available potassium c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s due to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>creased from 590 to 613 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> surface and 557 to 581 kg per ha <strong>in</strong><br />

subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s. The highest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium c<strong>on</strong>tent was <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S3 farmer (5.92%),<br />

followed by S2 farmer (4.10%) and lowest <strong>in</strong>crease was noticed <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S1 farmer (2.70%).<br />

All the <strong>soil</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed more available K <strong>in</strong> surface than <strong>in</strong> subsurface <strong>soil</strong>.<br />

In v<strong>in</strong>eyards, the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farms <strong>in</strong>dicated an <strong>in</strong>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> available<br />

potassium c<strong>on</strong>tent from 598 to 615 kg per ha and 575 to 589 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> surface and<br />

subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s, respectively. The highest and lowest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> potassium was recorded <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> V 3 (3.70%) and V 2 farmer (1.44%), respectively.<br />

4.4.4 Available sulphur <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong><br />

The results <strong>on</strong> available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>soil</strong>s as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 17. The available S c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>in</strong> all the <strong>soil</strong>s was above critical limit<br />

irrespective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> and cropp<strong>in</strong>g system followed.<br />

The results from cott<strong>on</strong> based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system showed that there was <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farms, mean available sulphur<br />

ranged from 27.75 kg per ha (C1) to 31.87 kg per ha (C4). The <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C4 farmer showed<br />

greater <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sulphur (14.30%), followed by C 1 farmer (11.60%) and lowest <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C2 farmer (9.52%). On an average, sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>in</strong> surface <strong>soil</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 27.68 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al farms to 30.50 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farms,<br />

account<strong>in</strong>g for an <strong>in</strong>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.20 per cent. Whereas, <strong>in</strong> subsurface <strong>soil</strong>, available S<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 25.26 kg per ha under c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> to 27.94 kg per ha under <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>, account<strong>in</strong>g for an <strong>in</strong>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.60 per cent.<br />

In kharif jowar based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two <strong>soil</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dicated an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent from 34.12 to 35.62 kg per ha and 31.87 to 32.75 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> surface and<br />

subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s, respectively. The average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> worked to 4.40 per cent <strong>in</strong> surface <strong>soil</strong> and 2.80 per cent <strong>in</strong> subsurface <strong>soil</strong>. The<br />

highest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> K2 farmer (3.90%).<br />

In rabi jowar based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three <strong>soil</strong>s showed an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface <strong>soil</strong> from 25.11 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al farm to 26.51<br />

kg per ha <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farm and <strong>in</strong> the subsurface it <strong>in</strong>creased from 23.21 to 24.58 kg per ha.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g the three <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farms, the highest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent over<br />

c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s R1 farmer (6.50%) and lowest <strong>in</strong>crease was <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> R 3 farmer (4.70%).<br />

The <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sugarcane based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> available<br />

sulphur due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> practice. The average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> available sulphur over<br />

c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> was 8.41 per cent and 8.60 per cent <strong>in</strong> surface and subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s,<br />

respectively. The mean available sulphur <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> farms ranged from 23.25 kg per<br />

ha (S4) to 31.47 kg per ha (S1). While, <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al farms it ranged from 21.75 kg per ha<br />

(S4) to 28.87 kg per ha (S1). The highest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> was noticed <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S1 farmer (10.00%) and lowest <strong>in</strong>crease was <strong>in</strong> <strong>soil</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S4<br />

(6.90%).<br />

The available sulphur c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three <strong>soil</strong>s under v<strong>in</strong>eyards recorded an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

36.41 and 33.68 kg per ha <strong>in</strong> surface and subsurface <strong>soil</strong>s, respectively under <str<strong>on</strong>g>organic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>farm<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!