11.05.2013 Views

Local NGOs in national development: The case of East Timor

Local NGOs in national development: The case of East Timor

Local NGOs in national development: The case of East Timor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Clark 2003). Najam (1996) lays out various ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>NGOs</strong>’ diverse<br />

accountability requirements can be met, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g through codes <strong>of</strong> conduct, standard<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g, and evaluation <strong>of</strong> programs as well as through transparency and report<strong>in</strong>g about<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial and other matters.<br />

A related thread <strong>in</strong> the literature relates to NGO partnerships. Orig<strong>in</strong>ally ‘partnership’<br />

was understood by <strong>NGOs</strong> as ‘a code word to reflect humanitarian, moral, political,<br />

ideological or spiritual solidarity between <strong>NGOs</strong> <strong>in</strong> the North and South that jo<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

together to pursue a common cause <strong>of</strong> social change’ (Fowler 1999). Today partnership<br />

can mean almost anyth<strong>in</strong>g—donors have partnerships with <strong>NGOs</strong> (Yonekura 2000)<br />

and <strong>NGOs</strong> have partnerships with the private sector (Murphy and Bedell 1999). <strong>The</strong><br />

concept has been stretched almost to the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>glessness. Hateley (1997)<br />

presents an analysis <strong>of</strong> partnership as either one-way and vertical <strong>in</strong> nature or two-way,<br />

more equal and mutual. Fowler (1998) believes that ‘authentic partnerships’ <strong>in</strong> which<br />

each partner plays an equal, if different, role and <strong>in</strong> which accountabilities are mutual,<br />

are rare, and Ahmad (2006) concurs. However, Hilhorst’s anthropological study <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Philipp<strong>in</strong>es NGO illustrates how local <strong>NGOs</strong>, which are generally seen as ‘at the<br />

mercy’ <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g agencies, may be more powerful <strong>in</strong> relation to the donor than is<br />

usually imag<strong>in</strong>ed. <strong>The</strong>se relationships are not simply contracts—they are negotiated<br />

processes, <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>of</strong> ‘multiple realities’ and multiple mean<strong>in</strong>gs. Even when donors and<br />

<strong>NGOs</strong> share the same language, their mean<strong>in</strong>gs or <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> it may vary<br />

(Hilhorst 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has also been a lively debate about the effectiveness and impact <strong>of</strong> NGO<br />

programs. Most <strong>of</strong>ficial evaluations and reviews <strong>of</strong> donor-supported programs have<br />

found <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong> <strong>NGOs</strong> (who frequently work <strong>in</strong> partnership with local <strong>NGOs</strong>) to be<br />

quite effective (AusAID 1995, DANIDA 1999, Riddell et al. 1997) but because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>NGOs</strong> and the range <strong>of</strong> work they undertake, it would be naïve to assume<br />

that problems do not exist. <strong>The</strong> literature <strong>of</strong>ten focusses on many <strong>of</strong> the problems,<br />

rather than the successes, and these may <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>effective programs with undesirable<br />

side effects, underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> state programs, patchy services, jealousies and<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!