Part I - David Greve

oneself orientate by it. The weaker the s-values are in
themselves, the weaker the system is, the more frequent it
needs accentuation. Consequently, a praise and approval
ritual develops which is disproportional to the effectivity
of the system.
Yes, it can be concluded: The more intensive this ritual,
the smaller is its real importance. Thus, an inversion of
its purpose takes place: Only the bearers preserve the
system without being orientated by it. Therefore, they
carry their vehicle or keep an organism alive only
artifically with extraordinary effort.
Thus, devotion and use of value systems mean
conservation, non-use their decline which is followed by
a loss of functionality, but not death (cf. basic principle
17). By that, a very elaborate „game without an end“
(Watzlawick loc. cit. p. 217, reference 158) can develop.
21. Placing justice of s-values in a value system
In every value system, the s-value has to have its exact
place. The exacter this place is outlined, the higher is the
performance of the s-value (cf. basic principle 14.4).
We call the fulfilment of this task placing justice. Here,
the appropriate method is decidedness. Between existing
s-values, new values can develop, the sequence can
become denser. The denser it becomes, the exacter the
place boundary of the s-value has to be. Exactness is a
basic requirement for the effectivity of a system, it begins
with careful terminology.
34