VALUABLE LESSONS - Nicholls + Vickers
VALUABLE LESSONS - Nicholls + Vickers
VALUABLE LESSONS - Nicholls + Vickers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Valuable Lessons 34<br />
pointing out that something a character does, of course comes from<br />
character, but something that happens to them comes from situation, and the<br />
way they react to it defines or develops their character. I found myself<br />
bringing this up in a test meeting with twenty executives in 2004. They just<br />
stared. They didn’t even hear it. It was one weak axe-blow to the thick<br />
gnarled base of the jargon tree – it didn’t shake the upper branches. You can<br />
cite Bob Newhart and Paul Reiser and Jerry Seinfeld, passive witnesses all<br />
to the madness surrounding them, they will keep insisting that “the plot<br />
doesn’t come enough from (our main character).” The stories on I Love<br />
Lucy came from character. Spongebob Squarepants’ dumb ideas often drive<br />
his stories. But many if not most sitcoms follow the form of the Hapless<br />
Character beset by Fate. I’ve tried Lucy-type shows – The Trouble With<br />
Larry being a prime example – and when they see it they don’t like it. The<br />
things the lead actor has to do to provoke crises big enough for comedy<br />
make him or her “unlikeable.”<br />
I had a spirited argument once with an exec after suggesting that<br />
Roger O. Thornhill’s predicament in Ernest Lehman’s and Alfred<br />
Hitchcock’s North By Northwest didn’t “come from character.” Rather, his<br />
handling of the predicament into which he was thrown by chance limned his<br />
character, revealing him as more resourceful and more serious than the tenminute<br />
prologue had indicated. I said, “Put Buster Keaton in the lead –<br />
certainly no Cary Grant – or Gretchen Moll, or Colin Farrell. The film still<br />
works. How can you say character and not plot is the main thing here?” He<br />
did.<br />
If every plot detail in a movie comes from character, how come a<br />
movie that gets offered to Nicholas Cage and then to Ralph Fiennes, and<br />
then to Julia Stiles and then Adam Sandler still works when it’s released<br />
starring Tom Hanks? These people do not project the same character. At<br />
every stage of development there were people saying “Sean Connery? Of<br />
course!” “Queen Latifah? Perfect!”<br />
“More singles” was the byword for a while in editing. A single is a<br />
shot of one character speaking or performing, even though he or she may be<br />
with someone else or in a room full of people. A single emphasizes that<br />
character and his or her lines and reactions, to the exclusion of the others in<br />
the room/car/boat/tornado. I once got this note from the WB: “Let’s add<br />
more singles in this sequence to emphasize the relationships between the<br />
characters.” Which of course is the one thing it doesn’t do; it de-emphasizes<br />
relationships because we don’t see the expressions on both faces during a<br />
conversation. For a whole year, when you watched a show on the WB,<br />
unless you came in at the top of a scene you had no idea who was on the set.