impact of microvia-in-pad design on void formation - Sanmina-SCI
impact of microvia-in-pad design on void formation - Sanmina-SCI
impact of microvia-in-pad design on void formation - Sanmina-SCI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Test 2: Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Surface F<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ish Test 3: Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Comp<strong>on</strong>ent Type<br />
There was vary<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g data for the surface f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ish<br />
comparis<strong>on</strong>s. Mean and standard deviati<strong>on</strong>s were fairly<br />
close but there was about a 25% <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>void</strong>s for the bottom slice <strong>on</strong> the boards with Immersi<strong>on</strong><br />
Ag plat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g.<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
0<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Total Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Voids<br />
Middle Slice Top Slice Bottom Slice<br />
Slice 1 - Middle (Total Void Count - 18,697)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Slice 2 - Top (Total Void Count - 6,801)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Slice 3 - Bottom (Total Void Count - 17,847)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Gold<br />
Silver<br />
Gold<br />
Silver<br />
Gold<br />
Silver<br />
Gold<br />
Silver<br />
For the comp<strong>on</strong>ent type data a normalizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the data<br />
was performed. There are 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each BGA type <strong>on</strong> the PCB<br />
but the I/O count drops as the pitch decreases. To<br />
compensate for the decrease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> solder jo<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ts<br />
it was assumed that the data distributi<strong>on</strong> was fairly normal<br />
and did a straight multiplicati<strong>on</strong> for the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>void</strong>s.<br />
The results when us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g this normalizati<strong>on</strong> shows that<br />
there is an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>void</strong>s although they<br />
do decrease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> size. This is to be expected s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce the viahole<br />
sizes are held c<strong>on</strong>stant and become a larger<br />
percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pad</str<strong>on</strong>g> volume as the pitch decreases.<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mils<br />
0<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Total Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Voids<br />
1.27 1.0 0.8 0.5<br />
BGA Pitch <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> mm<br />
Slice 1 - Middle (Total Void Count - 18,697)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Slice 2 - Top (Total Void Count - 6,801)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Slice 3 - Bottom (Total Void Count - 17,847)<br />
Mean Std Dev. Range M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>imum Maximum<br />
Middle Slice<br />
Top Slice<br />
Bottom Slice<br />
1.27<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
1.27<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
1.27<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.5