Subjects, Topics and the Interpretation of Referential pro.

Ramaglia, Francesca. 2006. ‘Focused Topic’, paper presented at the “XXXII Incontro di
Grammatica Generativa”, Università di Firenze.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. ‘Pragmatics and Linguistics: An analysis of sentence Topics’,
Philosophica 27, 53-94.
Reuland, Eric and Tanya Reinhart. 1995. ‘Pronouns, Anaphors and Case’, in H. Haider, S.
Olsen and S. Vikner (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Kluwer,
Dordrecht, pp. 241-269.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
⎯⎯⎯ 1986. ‘Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501-558.
⎯⎯⎯ 1990. Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
⎯⎯⎯ 1994. ‘Early Null Subjects and Root Null Subjects’, in T. Hoekstra and B. Schwartz
(eds.) Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, John Benjamins,
Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, 151-176
⎯⎯⎯ 1996. ‘Residual Verb Second and the Wh-Criterion’, in A. Belletti and L. Rizzi
(eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp. 63-90.
⎯⎯⎯ 1997a. ‘A Parametric Approach to Comparative Syntax Properties of the Pronominal
System’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, Longman, London, pp.
268-285.
⎯⎯⎯ 1997b. ‘The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of
grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281-337.
⎯⎯⎯ 2001. ‘Locality and left periphery’, ms., Università di Siena.
⎯⎯⎯ ed. 2004. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 2, The Structure of CP and
IP, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
⎯⎯⎯ 2006. ‘On the Form of Chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects’, in L. Cheng and
N. Corver (eds.), Wh Movement: moving on, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 97-133.
Roberts, Ian. 2004. ‘Some Consequences of a Deletion Analysis of Null Subjects’, paper
presented at the “LAGB Annual Meeting”, University of Surrey, Roehampton.
Rochemont, Michael and Peter Culicover. 1990. English Focus Constructions and the Theory
of Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rohrbacher, Bernhard Wolfgang 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A theory of V to I raising
and pro-drop, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Safir, Ken. 1985. ‘Missing Subjects in German’, in J. Toman (ed.), Linguistic Theory and the
Grammar of German, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 193-229.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2005. ‘Prosody-Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus’,
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23, 687-755.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1986. ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’, Phonology 3, 371-
405.
⎯⎯⎯ 2000. ‘The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing’, in M. Horne (ed.)
Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Studies presented to Gösta Bruce, Kluwer, Dordrecht,
pp. 231-261.
Selkirk, Elisabeth and Angelika Kratzer. 2007. ‘Focus, Phases and Phrase Stress’, ms.,
University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
SigurDsson, Halldór Á. 1993. ‘Argument-drop in old Icelandic’, Lingua 89, 247-280.
⎯⎯⎯ 2004a. ‘The Syntax of Person, Tense, and Speech features’, Italian Journal of
Linguistics 16, 219-251 [Special issue, ed. by V. Bianchi and K. Safir].
⎯⎯⎯ 2004b. ‘Agree and Agreement: evidence from Germanic’, in W. Abraham (ed.),
Focus on Germanic Typology (Studia Typologica 6), Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 61-
103.
38