APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
230<br />
Appendix 15<br />
Study details Population details Treatment details Results Interpretation<br />
Authors’ conclusions The study<br />
found no difference in short-term<br />
efficacy between ALA–PDT and<br />
MAL–PDT, so both can be equally<br />
recommended as photosensitisers<br />
Brief study appraisal This pilot<br />
study blinded both patients and<br />
outcome assessors. However, there<br />
was no mention of a power calculation<br />
and the sample size was very small; a<br />
larger study would have been more<br />
informative, particularly on differences<br />
in pain scores<br />
Morbidity There was no statistically<br />
significant difference in incomplete<br />
clearance rates [6/22 (27%) ALA vs<br />
6/21 (29%) MAL, p = 0.92]<br />
QoL and return to normal<br />
activity Not assessed<br />
AEs Average intensity of pain did not<br />
differ significantly between groups (1st<br />
treatment: VAS = 4.4 for ALA vs 2.8 for<br />
MAL, p = 0.09, 2nd treatment: VAS = 4.8<br />
for ALA vs 3.9 for MAL, p = 0.4), nor<br />
did character of pain. Most pain was<br />
described as being burning or stinging<br />
Trial treatments PDT with<br />
5-aminolevulinate (ALA–PDT) vs PDT<br />
with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL–<br />
PDT)<br />
Intervention ALA–PDT: All tumour<br />
tissue above skin level was removed<br />
by curettage (with ethyl chloride spray<br />
anaesthetic). The visible tumour, plus<br />
5-mm margin, was covered in a layer<br />
of 20% ALA cream (around 2 mm<br />
thick) and polyurethane and opaque<br />
dressings were applied. After 3 hr<br />
the area was cleaned and illuminated<br />
with light of 600–730 nm (from metal<br />
halogen source) with an intensity of<br />
100 mW/cm2 giving a total dose of<br />
75 J/cm2 . After illumination the area<br />
was covered with a light protective<br />
dressing for 1 d<br />
Procedure repeated after 7 d (but<br />
without debulking)<br />
Comparator MAL–PDT:<br />
Same methods as for PDT with<br />
5-aminolevulinate group, except 16%<br />
methyl aminolevulinate cream was<br />
used instead of 20% ALA<br />
Treatment intention Curative<br />
Type(s) of cancer and<br />
histology Nodular primary BCC<br />
Main eligibility criteria<br />
Patients with nodular primary<br />
BCC located anywhere on skin<br />
except periocular area and hairy<br />
scalp, with a clinical diameter<br />
smaller than 20 mm. Pigmented<br />
BCCs and patients with more<br />
than five BCCs were excluded,<br />
as were patients with porphyria,<br />
contraindications to surgery, or<br />
hypersensitivity to daylight or to<br />
either of the creams<br />
Patient characteristics<br />
% Male: 62<br />
Age range: 39–87 yr<br />
Mean age: 68 yr<br />
Most tumours were less than<br />
10 mm in diameter<br />
Concomitant treatment<br />
Topical emollient for pain<br />
Authors Kuijpers et<br />
al. (2006) 84<br />
Data source Full<br />
published paper<br />
Country The<br />
Netherlands<br />
Language English<br />
Study design RCT<br />
(between-participant<br />
comparison)<br />
No. of participants<br />
Total: 43 BCCs in 39<br />
patients<br />
Intervention: 22 BCCs<br />
Comparator: 21<br />
BCCs<br />
No. of recruiting<br />
centres One<br />
Follow-up period<br />
and frequency 8 wk