APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOI: 10.3310/hta14370 <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 2010; Vol. 14: No. 37<br />
Study details Population details Treatment details Results Interpretation<br />
Authors’ conclusions PDT is a valid method of<br />
palliation in partially or totally obstructing NSCLC<br />
Brief study appraisal Difficult to evaluate<br />
results due to important baseline differences<br />
(presence of cough, and stage of cancer) between<br />
groups. Karnofsky performance and FU after 1 mth<br />
assessed but not reported. No details on blinding<br />
Mortality Survival significantly<br />
longer in PDT group (265 vs 95<br />
d, p = 0.007). 4/14 (PDT) and 4/17<br />
(Nd:YAG) still alive at end of study<br />
Morbidity Similar response in<br />
both groups: 38.5% PDT vs 23.5%<br />
Nd:YAG at 1 mth (p = ns). PR<br />
at 1 mth in three PDT and four<br />
Nd:YAG patients. CR at 1 mth in<br />
one PDT patient. Time elapsed until<br />
treatment failure: 50 d (PDT) vs 38 d<br />
(Nd:YAG) (p = 0.03)<br />
QoL and return to normal<br />
activity Assessed but not reported<br />
AEs Bronchitis was the most<br />
common (four cases in PDT group,<br />
one in Nd:YAG group)<br />
Photosensitisation in four PDT<br />
patients. Five patients had no AEs,<br />
all in Nd:YAG group. One death<br />
probably related to PDT<br />
Trial treatments<br />
PDT vs Nd:YAG laser<br />
resection<br />
Intervention<br />
Intravenous DHE at dose<br />
of 2 mg/kg with 630-nm<br />
argon dye laser, 40–50 hr<br />
after injection. Maximum<br />
of three doses (six<br />
photoradiations). Other<br />
parameters not reported<br />
Comparator Nd:YAG<br />
resection using 15- to<br />
80-W pulses of 0.5–1.5 s.<br />
Procedure repeated<br />
every 2–4 d as necessary<br />
Treatment intention Palliative<br />
Types of Lung Cancer and<br />
Histology Non-small cell 25<br />
SCC, three adenocarcinoma, three<br />
undifferentiated carcinoma<br />
Main eligibility criteria Biopsyproven<br />
inoperable cancer with totally<br />
or partially obstructive endobronchial<br />
lesions with or without extrabronchial<br />
tumour. Patients > 18 yr, nonpregnant,<br />
infertile or postmenopausal.<br />
Karnofsky status ≥ 40%, ≥ 4 wk from<br />
last chemotherapy cycle and ≥ 3 wk<br />
from last radiation dose. Patients who<br />
had previous PDT or Nd:YAG were<br />
excluded. Further eligibility criteria<br />
were reported<br />
Patient characteristics<br />
% Male: 100<br />
Age range: Not stated<br />
Mean age: 65 yr<br />
Cancer stage: Stage I, four patients;<br />
stage II, one; stage IIIA, six; stage IIIB,<br />
10; stage IV, seven<br />
No. with recurrent tumour: three<br />
Concomitant treatment Not<br />
stated<br />
Authors Diaz-<br />
Jimenez et al. (1999) 122<br />
Data source Full<br />
published paper<br />
Country Spain<br />
Language English<br />
Study Design<br />
RCT<br />
No. of participants<br />
Total: 31<br />
Intervention: 14<br />
Comparator: 17<br />
No. of Recruiting<br />
Centres Not stated<br />
Follow-up period<br />
and frequency<br />
FU at 1, 2, 3, 6 and<br />
12 mth (and 18 mth if<br />
possible)<br />
© 2010 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved.<br />
267