03.06.2013 Views

APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme

APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme

APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

188<br />

Appendix 13<br />

Study details Population details Treatment details Results Interpretation<br />

Authors’ conclusions PDT using a<br />

1-hr incubation with 160 mg/g MAL<br />

cream may have potential for treating<br />

relatively mild AK lesions and offers<br />

practical advantages, but regular<br />

substitution is not recommended<br />

Brief study appraisal As the authors<br />

acknowledge, there were some<br />

important flaws in the design of this<br />

study, including the lack of blinding of<br />

outcome assessors, and having response<br />

rate judgements made clinically rather<br />

than histologically. Although the mean<br />

incubation and illumination times were<br />

consistent according to the protocol,<br />

it was clear that a large proportion of<br />

patients received only 1 PDT session<br />

(when 2 are recommended) and<br />

around one-third of lesions had not<br />

been debrided. Given that the protocol<br />

does not appear to have been followed<br />

closely, or has not utilised PDT optimally,<br />

these results should be considered with<br />

caution. No p-values or formal tests of<br />

statistical significance appear to have<br />

been carried out, making it difficult to<br />

assess the real differences between<br />

treatment groups<br />

Morbidity Lesion response (based on<br />

110 patients with 380 lesions, two patients<br />

with four lesions excluded due to wrong<br />

diagnosis). Overall lesion response (not<br />

clear if CR) 85% 3 hr + 160 mg/g 76%<br />

1 hr + 160 mg/g 74% 3 hr + 80 mg/g 77%<br />

1 hr + 80 mg/g. Note: About one-third of<br />

lesions were not debrided as per protocol.<br />

For the 3 hr + 160 mg/g group CR was<br />

higher for debrided lesions (89%) than nondebrided<br />

(78%)<br />

Lesion recurrence (evaluated in 97 patients<br />

with 299 lesions that had responded<br />

completely): The lowest recurrence rates<br />

occurred in the 3 hr + 160 mg/g group (11%)<br />

compared with between 26% and 45% for<br />

the other groups<br />

Patients who received two PDT sessions:<br />

Lesion recurrence was lower for the 1-hr<br />

and 3 hr + 160 mg/g groups (19% and 17%)<br />

than for the 80 mg/g groups (44–45%). For<br />

debrided lesions in the 3 hr + 160 mg/g<br />

recurrence was 10% vs 14% for nondebrided<br />

lesions<br />

QoL and return to normal activity<br />

Cosmetic outcome (assessed by VAS score<br />

at 12 mth) was rated at between 8.4 cm and<br />

9.3 cm by both investigator and patients<br />

indicating an excellent cosmetic outcome<br />

AEs Most AEs were mild intensity and the<br />

majority were local. The most commonly<br />

reported AE was erythema with a median<br />

duration of 17 d. Other AEs included skin<br />

pain, pruritis, burning sensation on skin,<br />

oedema and suppuration. Four patients<br />

experienced SAEs but these were not<br />

considered to be treatment related<br />

Treatment-related AE %:<br />

1 hr + 160 mg/g, 98%<br />

3 hr + 160 mg/g, 99%<br />

1 hr + 80m/g, 98%<br />

3 hr + 80 mg/g, 96%<br />

Trial treatments MAL–PDT comparing<br />

incubation time (1 hr or 3 hr) and dose<br />

(160 mg/g or 80 mg/g)<br />

Intervention MAL–PDT<br />

(1 hr + 160 mg/g). Most lesions were<br />

prepared using dermal curette to remove<br />

scales and crusts. 1-mm-thick layer of<br />

MAL cream applied to each lesion and<br />

to 5 mm of surrounding area. Lesions<br />

covered with occlusive dressing for<br />

specified incubation period then wiped<br />

off with saline. Lesions were illuminated<br />

with red lamp light (wavelength 570–<br />

670 nm, intensity 70 – 190 mW/cm2 )<br />

to provide total light dose of 75 J/cm2 .<br />

The mean illumination time was around<br />

9.5 min. Any lesions without CR at 2 or<br />

3 mth were given 2nd PDT treatment.<br />

Any non-CR at 6 mth offered alternative<br />

treatment<br />

Comparator MAL–PDT<br />

(3 hr + 160 mg/g) as above<br />

2nd comparator MAL–PDT<br />

(1 hr + 80 mg/g) as above<br />

3rd comparator MAL–PDT<br />

(3 hr + 80 mg/g) as above<br />

Treatment intention<br />

Curative<br />

Type(s) of lesion and<br />

histology Primary AK<br />

Main eligibility criteria<br />

Patients of 18 yr or older<br />

with Fitzpatrick skin type<br />

I, II or II with primary<br />

previously untreated,<br />

non-pigmented and noninfiltrating<br />

AK lesions (up<br />

to four lesions). Extensive<br />

exclusion criteria were<br />

reported<br />

Patient characteristics<br />

% Male: 56, age not<br />

reported. The majority of<br />

patients had three or fewer<br />

lesions; most were located<br />

on the face/scalp and were<br />

thin or moderately thick<br />

Concomitant<br />

treatment Not stated<br />

Authors Braathen et<br />

al. (2008) 54<br />

Data source Full<br />

published paper<br />

Country Not stated,<br />

‘Europe’<br />

Language English<br />

Study design RCT<br />

No. of participants<br />

Total: 119<br />

randomised, 112<br />

treated (384 lesions)<br />

Intervention: 28 (1 hr;<br />

160 mg/g)<br />

Comparator: 30<br />

(3 hr; 160 mg/g)<br />

2nd Comparator: 25<br />

(1 hr; 80 mg/g)<br />

3rd Comparator: 29<br />

(3 hr; 80 mg/g)<br />

No. of recruiting<br />

centres Eight<br />

Follow-up period<br />

and frequency FU<br />

at wk 1 and 2, then<br />

at 2, 3, 6 and 12 mth<br />

d, day(s); hr, hour(s); mth, month(s); wk, week(s); yr, year(s).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!