APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
APPENDICES - NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
188<br />
Appendix 13<br />
Study details Population details Treatment details Results Interpretation<br />
Authors’ conclusions PDT using a<br />
1-hr incubation with 160 mg/g MAL<br />
cream may have potential for treating<br />
relatively mild AK lesions and offers<br />
practical advantages, but regular<br />
substitution is not recommended<br />
Brief study appraisal As the authors<br />
acknowledge, there were some<br />
important flaws in the design of this<br />
study, including the lack of blinding of<br />
outcome assessors, and having response<br />
rate judgements made clinically rather<br />
than histologically. Although the mean<br />
incubation and illumination times were<br />
consistent according to the protocol,<br />
it was clear that a large proportion of<br />
patients received only 1 PDT session<br />
(when 2 are recommended) and<br />
around one-third of lesions had not<br />
been debrided. Given that the protocol<br />
does not appear to have been followed<br />
closely, or has not utilised PDT optimally,<br />
these results should be considered with<br />
caution. No p-values or formal tests of<br />
statistical significance appear to have<br />
been carried out, making it difficult to<br />
assess the real differences between<br />
treatment groups<br />
Morbidity Lesion response (based on<br />
110 patients with 380 lesions, two patients<br />
with four lesions excluded due to wrong<br />
diagnosis). Overall lesion response (not<br />
clear if CR) 85% 3 hr + 160 mg/g 76%<br />
1 hr + 160 mg/g 74% 3 hr + 80 mg/g 77%<br />
1 hr + 80 mg/g. Note: About one-third of<br />
lesions were not debrided as per protocol.<br />
For the 3 hr + 160 mg/g group CR was<br />
higher for debrided lesions (89%) than nondebrided<br />
(78%)<br />
Lesion recurrence (evaluated in 97 patients<br />
with 299 lesions that had responded<br />
completely): The lowest recurrence rates<br />
occurred in the 3 hr + 160 mg/g group (11%)<br />
compared with between 26% and 45% for<br />
the other groups<br />
Patients who received two PDT sessions:<br />
Lesion recurrence was lower for the 1-hr<br />
and 3 hr + 160 mg/g groups (19% and 17%)<br />
than for the 80 mg/g groups (44–45%). For<br />
debrided lesions in the 3 hr + 160 mg/g<br />
recurrence was 10% vs 14% for nondebrided<br />
lesions<br />
QoL and return to normal activity<br />
Cosmetic outcome (assessed by VAS score<br />
at 12 mth) was rated at between 8.4 cm and<br />
9.3 cm by both investigator and patients<br />
indicating an excellent cosmetic outcome<br />
AEs Most AEs were mild intensity and the<br />
majority were local. The most commonly<br />
reported AE was erythema with a median<br />
duration of 17 d. Other AEs included skin<br />
pain, pruritis, burning sensation on skin,<br />
oedema and suppuration. Four patients<br />
experienced SAEs but these were not<br />
considered to be treatment related<br />
Treatment-related AE %:<br />
1 hr + 160 mg/g, 98%<br />
3 hr + 160 mg/g, 99%<br />
1 hr + 80m/g, 98%<br />
3 hr + 80 mg/g, 96%<br />
Trial treatments MAL–PDT comparing<br />
incubation time (1 hr or 3 hr) and dose<br />
(160 mg/g or 80 mg/g)<br />
Intervention MAL–PDT<br />
(1 hr + 160 mg/g). Most lesions were<br />
prepared using dermal curette to remove<br />
scales and crusts. 1-mm-thick layer of<br />
MAL cream applied to each lesion and<br />
to 5 mm of surrounding area. Lesions<br />
covered with occlusive dressing for<br />
specified incubation period then wiped<br />
off with saline. Lesions were illuminated<br />
with red lamp light (wavelength 570–<br />
670 nm, intensity 70 – 190 mW/cm2 )<br />
to provide total light dose of 75 J/cm2 .<br />
The mean illumination time was around<br />
9.5 min. Any lesions without CR at 2 or<br />
3 mth were given 2nd PDT treatment.<br />
Any non-CR at 6 mth offered alternative<br />
treatment<br />
Comparator MAL–PDT<br />
(3 hr + 160 mg/g) as above<br />
2nd comparator MAL–PDT<br />
(1 hr + 80 mg/g) as above<br />
3rd comparator MAL–PDT<br />
(3 hr + 80 mg/g) as above<br />
Treatment intention<br />
Curative<br />
Type(s) of lesion and<br />
histology Primary AK<br />
Main eligibility criteria<br />
Patients of 18 yr or older<br />
with Fitzpatrick skin type<br />
I, II or II with primary<br />
previously untreated,<br />
non-pigmented and noninfiltrating<br />
AK lesions (up<br />
to four lesions). Extensive<br />
exclusion criteria were<br />
reported<br />
Patient characteristics<br />
% Male: 56, age not<br />
reported. The majority of<br />
patients had three or fewer<br />
lesions; most were located<br />
on the face/scalp and were<br />
thin or moderately thick<br />
Concomitant<br />
treatment Not stated<br />
Authors Braathen et<br />
al. (2008) 54<br />
Data source Full<br />
published paper<br />
Country Not stated,<br />
‘Europe’<br />
Language English<br />
Study design RCT<br />
No. of participants<br />
Total: 119<br />
randomised, 112<br />
treated (384 lesions)<br />
Intervention: 28 (1 hr;<br />
160 mg/g)<br />
Comparator: 30<br />
(3 hr; 160 mg/g)<br />
2nd Comparator: 25<br />
(1 hr; 80 mg/g)<br />
3rd Comparator: 29<br />
(3 hr; 80 mg/g)<br />
No. of recruiting<br />
centres Eight<br />
Follow-up period<br />
and frequency FU<br />
at wk 1 and 2, then<br />
at 2, 3, 6 and 12 mth<br />
d, day(s); hr, hour(s); mth, month(s); wk, week(s); yr, year(s).