05.06.2013 Views

Stabilization Selection Guide for Aggregate - Illinois Department of ...

Stabilization Selection Guide for Aggregate - Illinois Department of ...

Stabilization Selection Guide for Aggregate - Illinois Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER THREE<br />

Mechanical <strong>Stabilization</strong><br />

Mechanical <strong>Stabilization</strong><br />

INTROdUCTION<br />

Mechanical stabilization covers everything from compacting<br />

and blending soils, to incorporating any <strong>of</strong> a vast assortment<br />

<strong>of</strong> conventional geosynthetics, to using (installing, placing,<br />

incorporating, blending) less conventional materials, such as<br />

woodchips, sawdust, and woodmats, to aid in meeting the required<br />

strength. This section references tables that provide in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on conventional and less conventional mechanical-stabilization<br />

techniques.<br />

SELECTING A MECHANICAL-STABILIZING TECHNIqUE<br />

Compaction and geosynthetics are the most widely used and<br />

accepted mechanical-stabilizing techniques. Appendix table H.1<br />

provides a comprehensive listing <strong>of</strong> issues and concerns, such<br />

as serviceability, safety, environment, and cost <strong>for</strong> three selected<br />

mechanical-stabilization categories: cellular confinement, fiber<br />

rein<strong>for</strong>cement, and geotextile/geogrid rein<strong>for</strong>cement (FHWA 1995).<br />

The chapter also briefly discusses several less conventional<br />

and far less used techniques. Appendix table H.2 is a decision<br />

matrix resulting from a military test in which many <strong>of</strong> these less<br />

conventional expedient stabilization techniques were evaluated<br />

(Kestler et al. 1999). Although military and <strong>for</strong>est roads may differ<br />

in purpose, some <strong>of</strong> these stabilizing surfaces could be used<br />

within the Forest Service <strong>for</strong> temporary roads over s<strong>of</strong>t ground and<br />

localized sections requiring stabilization. The emphasis here is on<br />

localized sections; the surfaces are generally not recommended<br />

as a stabilization technique <strong>for</strong> a road <strong>of</strong> any length. The table<br />

provides rankings on factors such as traction, equipment required<br />

<strong>for</strong> construction, life expectancy, ease <strong>of</strong> walking/foot traffic, etc.<br />

Ashmawy et al. (2006) provide a comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

various recycled materials that can be used to stabilize marginal<br />

soils in Florida. Such materials include scrap tires and slag because<br />

<strong>of</strong> their relatively low cost and desirable engineering properties.<br />

These less conventional techniques may provide viable alternatives<br />

to more costly standard stabilization techniques, but require sound<br />

engineering judgment and good management practices.<br />

Compaction<br />

Compaction is the most basic <strong>of</strong> the mechanical-stabilization<br />

techniques. Proper compaction is essential. It increases density<br />

thus lowering the potential <strong>of</strong> increased moisture content, even in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> saturation. Both increased density and decreased moisture<br />

content potentially increase strength.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!