Download - Nanowerk
Download - Nanowerk
Download - Nanowerk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Some NGO’s have expressed concern about health, safety and environmental aspects of<br />
engineered nanomaterials and applications in sensitive consumer products such as<br />
cosmetics, washing machines and food. Other NGO’s are concerned about privacy and<br />
human rights aspects of the information society, or with (military) arms control and<br />
disarmament. No NGO appears to have taken a position explicitly mentioning<br />
nanotechnology based security technologies.<br />
4. What are the key issues for further research in social sciences and humanities,<br />
public debate and political decision making based on the analysis in this chapter?<br />
ESRAB (2006) recommends research into ‘ethical aspects of security technologies’ and a<br />
‘review of existing codes of conduct, best practices, etc. as to the ethical use of security<br />
technologies and to develop new ones where shortfalls exist’. These are relevant to<br />
security applications of nanotechnology.<br />
Research in social sciences and humanities must also contribute to the development of<br />
new Privacy Enhancing Technologies, and on criteria for assessing if new technologies<br />
respect citizens’ rights and current legislation. Such research must also enable early<br />
identification of a need for new or adapted legislation.<br />
Public debate must be organized to articulate public acceptance of security measures,<br />
technologies and nanotechnologies.<br />
Political decision-making must focus on developing new European regulations for<br />
handling classified information in EU funded projects, and for regulating and<br />
standardising Privacy Enhancing Technologies. There is a need for a more fundamental<br />
debate about the right balance between civil and security research and technologies, in<br />
order to avoid unnecessary constraints on academic and trade freedom.<br />
57