07.06.2013 Views

Attachment B: Copyrighted Literature Search Results - FAA Human ...

Attachment B: Copyrighted Literature Search Results - FAA Human ...

Attachment B: Copyrighted Literature Search Results - FAA Human ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AZ- 1771155<br />

AA- N94-13310/5<br />

TI- Improvements in Hover Display Dynamics for a Combat Helicopter<br />

AU- Schroeder, J. A. ; Eshow, M. M.<br />

CS- National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, CA. Ames<br />

Research Center.<br />

CS- 019045001; NC473657<br />

PY- Jul 93<br />

PG- 16p<br />

NT- In Its Piloting Vertical Flight Aircraft: A Conference on Flying<br />

Qualities and <strong>Human</strong> Factors p 235-250.<br />

LA- English<br />

PC- (Order as N94-13294/1, PC A21/MF A04)<br />

JA- GRAI9403; STAR3202<br />

CP- United States<br />

AB- This paper describes a piloted simulation conducted on the NASA Ames<br />

Vertical Motion Simulator. The objective of the experiment was to<br />

investigate the handling qualities benefits attainable using new<br />

display law design methods for hover displays. The new display laws<br />

provide improved methods to specify the behavior of the display symbol<br />

that predicts the vehicle's ground velocity in the horizontal plane; it<br />

is the primary symbol that the pilot uses to control aircraft<br />

horizontal position. The display law design was applied to the Apache<br />

helmet-mounted display format, using the Apache vehicle dynamics to<br />

tailor the dynamics of the velocity predictor symbol. The<br />

representations of the Apache vehicle used in the display design<br />

process and in the simulation were derived from flight data. During the<br />

simulation, the new symbol dynamics were seen to improve the pilots'<br />

ability to maneuver about hover in poor visual cuing environments. The<br />

improvements were manifested in pilot handling qualities ratings and in<br />

measured task performance. The paper details the display design<br />

techniques, the experiment design and conduct, and the results.<br />

DE- *Display devices; *Flight characteristics; *Flight simulation;<br />

*Helicopter control; *Helmet mounted displays; *Hovering; *Military<br />

helicopters; *Pilot performance; Controllability; Helicopter<br />

performance; Ah-64 helicopter; Cues; Ratings; Symbols; Tasks; Vertical<br />

motion simulators; Workloads (Psychophysiology)<br />

ID- NTISNASA<br />

SH- 51C (Aeronautics and Aerodynamics--Aircraft); 51B (Aeronautics and<br />

Aerodynamics--Aeronautics); 51F (Aeronautics and Aerodynamics--Test<br />

Facilities and Equipment); 95D (Biomedical Technology and <strong>Human</strong> Factors<br />

Engineering--<strong>Human</strong> Factors Engineering)<br />

B-461<br />

AZ- 1771152<br />

AA- N94-13307/1<br />

TI- Compatibility of Information and Mode of Control: The Case for Natural<br />

Control Systems<br />

AU- Owen, D. H.<br />

CS- Canterbury Univ., Christchurch (New Zealand). Dept. of Psychology.<br />

CS- 888888888; CG092919<br />

SP- National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC.<br />

PY- Jul 93<br />

PG- 6p<br />

NT- In NASA. Ames Research Center, Piloting Vertical Flight Aircraft: A<br />

Conference on Flying Qualities and <strong>Human</strong> Factors p 199-204.<br />

LA- English<br />

PC- (Order as N94-13294/1, PC A21/MF A04)<br />

JA- GRAI9403; STAR3202<br />

CP- New Zealand<br />

AB- The operation of control systems has been determined largely by<br />

mechanical constraints. Compatibility with the characteristics of the<br />

operator is a secondary consideration, with the result that control may<br />

never be optimal, control workload may interfere with performance of<br />

secondary tasks, and learning may be more difficult and protracted than<br />

necessary. With the introduction of a computer in the control loop, the<br />

mode of operation can be adapted to the operator, rather than vice<br />

versa. The concept of natural control is introduced to describe a<br />

system that supports control of the information used by the operator in<br />

achieving an intended goal. As an example, control of speed during<br />

simulated approach to a pad by helicopter pilots is used to contrast<br />

path-speed control with direct control of global optical flow-pattern<br />

information. Differences are evidenced in the performance domains of<br />

control activity, speed, and global optical flow velocity.<br />

DE- *Approach control; *Flight control; *Helicopter control; *Man machine<br />

systems; *Visual control; Control systems design; Optical flow (Image<br />

analysis); Compatibility; Visual tasks; Workloads (Psychophysiology)<br />

ID- *Foreign technology; NTISNASA<br />

SH- 51C (Aeronautics and Aerodynamics--Aircraft); 51B (Aeronautics and<br />

Aerodynamics--Aeronautics); 95D (Biomedical Technology and <strong>Human</strong><br />

Factors Engineering--<strong>Human</strong> Factors Engineering)<br />

AZ- 1771150<br />

AA- N94-13305/5<br />

TI- Four-Axis Hand Controller for Helicopter Flight Control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!