You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
T<br />
The Legend of Lilith: The Origins of Evil and the Fall of Man<br />
CHAPTER 5<br />
<strong>THE</strong> NATURE <strong>OF</strong> EVIL<br />
hings are not always as they seem. Reality and Truth are always multilayered and the boundaries of what is good and<br />
evil are not always so clear cut and become blurred. What may seem good could in reality be evil and vice versa.<br />
Whatever appears to be evil or even unpleasant, not only fulfills a vital purpose, the cleansing of an organism, but also<br />
serves to remove the useless Force and Form from the main area of a particular activity where it may be of great use to the<br />
plan of the Creator. Like excretions from the body, it is unpleasant but necessary or the mechanism would become<br />
blocked by waste material and cause the body to die.<br />
It is important to understand that Ayn Sof is beyond good and evil. We must not attribute goodness to IT as to do so<br />
would exclude evil, and thus would leave IT deficient or lacking something. Ayn Sof embraces everything, including the<br />
totality of good and evil. The old dichotomy views good and evil on opposite ends of a pole. The new paradigm suggests<br />
that Elohim is in every direction, represented by the archetype of light, and HaSatan is represented by the archetype of<br />
veils. From this worldview evil is defined as anything that dims the light. Dr. Carl Jung writes:<br />
• “I begin with nothingness. Nothingness is the same as fullness. In infinity full is no better than empty. Nothingness<br />
is both empty and full.” 54<br />
The nothingness of Ayn Sof follows the Endless One’s unknowability by the human mind. It is eternally unknowable.<br />
Ayn Sof cannot be spoken of in any language and cannot be conceived by the mind. Ayn Sof has no being and does not<br />
exist. Ayn Sof transcends every distinction between being and nothingness. It is the absolute unlimited entity. Existence<br />
implies limitation, something rather than nothing. Ayn Sof is not nothing in the ordinary sense of the word. Ayn Sof transcends<br />
the entire existence-non-existence distinction. It includes everything and nothing. It is an infinite, undifferentiated<br />
unity or imagine an infinitely extending empty void.<br />
• “Supposed someone merged with or became the whole universe, and so came to include everything that exists<br />
.Even then, he would not be unlimited-he still would be that particular universe. We must imagine something that<br />
somehow includes all possibilities, all possible universes, and excludes nothing. This something not only is not limited<br />
to some portion of actuality while excluding the rest, it is also not limited to that one portion of possibility<br />
which is all of actuality.” Robert Nozick, philosopher<br />
• “Ayn Sof has more being than any other being in the world, but since it is simple, and all other simple things are<br />
complex when compared with its simplicity, so in comparison is called nothing.”-Scholem, Kabbalah.<br />
• “ Ayn Sof is the principle in which everything hidden and visible meet, and as such it is the common root of both<br />
faith and unbelief”-Azriel, Scholem ,Origins of Kabbalah, pp.441-442<br />
• “The revelation of anything is actually through its opposite.”- R. Aaron Ha-Levi<br />
This radical new viewpoint says that evil is not a thing; rather, it is related to awareness. Money can be good or evil, depending<br />
upon what we do with it. A bad seed can produce a poisonous fruit, or it can be converted into something useful.<br />
Mold can be discarded as harmful, but certain kinds of mold become penicillin. The notions of good and evil imply their<br />
opposites, or, have their opposite built into their very essence.<br />
If we try to define material objects, we invoke a host of ideas (weight, space, density, etc.) that leads to conclusions concerning<br />
that object that cannot be understood except via its opposite. The logical conclusion is that “good” (beneficial to<br />
the world) is also “evil” (as the world is an estrangement from the ultimate good-Elohim). Concepts swing over into their<br />
opposites as we try to understand them more definitively. Ayn Sof is thus the limit at which all concepts deconstruct and<br />
54 Jung taught that the Creator represents both good and evil, persona and shadow, a coincidence of opposites. This is the opposite of<br />
the Gnostics. Gnosticism holds to a dualism of good immateriality and evil matter; while for Jung good and evil originate and end in<br />
the same Source, are mutually dependent upon one another, and simply identified with spirit and matter.<br />
42