Euston-Brown, D., Rathogwa, N & Richardson ... - DWA Home Page
Euston-Brown, D., Rathogwa, N & Richardson ... - DWA Home Page
Euston-Brown, D., Rathogwa, N & Richardson ... - DWA Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ainfall (mm)<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Rainfall at Tzaneen by season<br />
summer autumn winter spring annual total<br />
months<br />
Figure 2: Rainfall by season over four years at Tzaneen. The annual total is also shown. Data supplied by the<br />
South African Weather Service (no data available for winter and and spring 2006).<br />
The time and number of people it took to apply the various treatments to the plots was recorded and<br />
this was converted to person days per hectare. The follow up treatments were consistently quicker<br />
to do than the initial treatments, taking on average one eighth of the time. The foliar spray method<br />
was the quickest method while the cut & treat method takes about two times longer (Kruskal-Wallis<br />
ANOVA by ranks, p=0.01).<br />
Figure 3a and b provides a broad summary of the results obtained at both sites between 2005 and<br />
2004. and between 2006 and 2004. The cut & treat method was the most effective clearing method<br />
at both the Hilltop and Theuns Botha Sites in 2005 (Figure 3a). The foliar spray and hand pulling<br />
treatments are also effective but not as effective as the cut & treat method. In 2005 all treatments<br />
resulted in an average loss of indigenous species, but by 2006 this had changed to an overall increase<br />
in diversity. In 2006 all treatments were very effective for clearing chromolaena, except for the stacking<br />
treatment for cut & treat with chopper which had a high recovery of chromolaena at the Hilltop site.<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Appendix 2<br />
1