15.06.2013 Views

Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange

Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange

Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tion. I have not tested this since I don't have a Zephyr but according<br />

to the Zephyr manual, he is incorrect.<br />

The manual says "You can add a locomotive to an MU in either<br />

orientation and in any physical location in the train."<br />

Further it says "Choose two locos you want to MU together. Place<br />

them on the track. Make sure that both locos that will be part of the<br />

MU are headed in the same physical direction."<br />

That means that they must be moving in the same direction when<br />

you MU them together but can be elephant style or back to back.<br />

This si also consistent with all the other Digitrac command stations.<br />

Dale.<br />

16<br />

Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Fritz on March 15, 2004, 03:31am<br />

I agree with you on the test.<br />

My Zephyr can perform any style<br />

of consist without changing CVs<br />

19 and 29. Tested this.<br />

Fritz<br />

Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Don Fiehmann on March 21, 2004, 12:06pm<br />

When I wrote the Zephyr review it was the first time that I had<br />

worked with a Digitrax DCC system. I was not familiar the way<br />

Digitrax handled consisting. My layout has both the Zephyr and<br />

an NCE system. My experience was with the NCE system that<br />

sets up consists differently than the Digitrax. I think that the<br />

â œsame physical directionâ comment in the manual was not<br />

clear to me and I thought at that time it meant they both had to be<br />

operating in the same direction. That is why I changed CV-29 in<br />

one of the Doodlebugs to operate in the reverse direction from<br />

normal. The advantage for me was that this change allowed the<br />

two units to operate correctly with either the Zephyr or the NCE<br />

system.<br />

Don Fiehmann<br />

Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Dale Gloer on March 24, 2004, 08:44am<br />

Too bad you wrote it in a modeller's magazine and probably did<br />

damage to the acceptability of a very fine product.<br />

Dale.<br />

Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Ray Porter on April 01, 2004, 12:40pm<br />

The problem with Muing is that both engines must have both<br />

decoders set to run inthe same direction before setting the MU.<br />

If one was last running in the opposite direction then that is the<br />

way they will continue to run after the MU is set up. Using the<br />

bell or whistle will also sometimes cause another loco to<br />

suddeenly go into reverse - especially one controlled by a jump<br />

port. By pressing the jump button you can control the functions<br />

on the engine thus controlled at any time.<br />

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Fritz on April 03, 2004, 03:04am<br />

NO.<br />

The manual is omitting the most important point on MUing.<br />

When setting up a back-to-back consist, select the lead or top<br />

address according to the manual.<br />

Then hit the MU-button.<br />

!Then set the direction lever in reverse!.<br />

Then continue according to the manual.<br />

There is NO need to change the NDOT<br />

in CV29.<br />

This holds true for UniVersal as well as well as for Advanced<br />

consisting.<br />

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by Fritz on April 03, 2004, 09:38am<br />

Ray,<br />

Before setting the reverse lever,<br />

enter the address of the trailing unit. (See the exclamation mark<br />

line of my previous posting.)<br />

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />

Posted by raymond on April 04, 2004, 01:17pm<br />

Thanks, works every time following your procedure. Hope<br />

Digitrax are reading these postings. Now if only someone has a<br />

solution to the weird reversals when a funtion key is activated<br />

for a train on another port. I like the Zephyr but would probalby<br />

be happiest with an MRC Prodigy if it had the same programming<br />

capability. The knob on the Zephyr is pleasant to use but<br />

the MRC hand-helds are the most comforatable fit to my hand.<br />

Turntable Wiring<br />

Posted by Bill Stone on March 03, 2004, 04:45pm<br />

Thanks Dale, since I'm using DCC I'll order an auto reverser from<br />

Tony.<br />

Bill<br />

Re: Turntable Wiring<br />

Posted by Dale Gloer on March 05, 2004, 08:39am<br />

Bill,<br />

just a reminder that for the autoreverser to be effective and not<br />

operate too much, you should wire the exit tracks (those to the<br />

roundhouse) the same as the approach track(s) and use the<br />

autoreverser to connect only the turntable track.<br />

Dale.<br />

Turntable Wiring<br />

Posted by Bill Stone on March 02, 2004, 10:40pm<br />

Do I need to use an auto reverser?<br />

Or, do I simply connect the table rails to the approach tracks.<br />

Re: Turntable Wiring<br />

Posted by Dale Gloer on March 03, 2004, 08:46am<br />

You need a reversing scheme of some kind, either a manually<br />

operated DPDT switch wired for reversing polarity, or an<br />

automatic scheme which could be an autoreverser if your using<br />

DCC or some turntables have their power pick up through a split<br />

pit rail which takes care of the reversing function.<br />

Dale.<br />

<strong>Original</strong> Tony’s <strong>Train</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> <strong>Web</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>System</strong>, 1998-2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!