Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange
Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange
Original Web Bulletin Board System - Tony's Train Exchange
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tion. I have not tested this since I don't have a Zephyr but according<br />
to the Zephyr manual, he is incorrect.<br />
The manual says "You can add a locomotive to an MU in either<br />
orientation and in any physical location in the train."<br />
Further it says "Choose two locos you want to MU together. Place<br />
them on the track. Make sure that both locos that will be part of the<br />
MU are headed in the same physical direction."<br />
That means that they must be moving in the same direction when<br />
you MU them together but can be elephant style or back to back.<br />
This si also consistent with all the other Digitrac command stations.<br />
Dale.<br />
16<br />
Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Fritz on March 15, 2004, 03:31am<br />
I agree with you on the test.<br />
My Zephyr can perform any style<br />
of consist without changing CVs<br />
19 and 29. Tested this.<br />
Fritz<br />
Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Don Fiehmann on March 21, 2004, 12:06pm<br />
When I wrote the Zephyr review it was the first time that I had<br />
worked with a Digitrax DCC system. I was not familiar the way<br />
Digitrax handled consisting. My layout has both the Zephyr and<br />
an NCE system. My experience was with the NCE system that<br />
sets up consists differently than the Digitrax. I think that the<br />
â œsame physical directionâ comment in the manual was not<br />
clear to me and I thought at that time it meant they both had to be<br />
operating in the same direction. That is why I changed CV-29 in<br />
one of the Doodlebugs to operate in the reverse direction from<br />
normal. The advantage for me was that this change allowed the<br />
two units to operate correctly with either the Zephyr or the NCE<br />
system.<br />
Don Fiehmann<br />
Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Dale Gloer on March 24, 2004, 08:44am<br />
Too bad you wrote it in a modeller's magazine and probably did<br />
damage to the acceptability of a very fine product.<br />
Dale.<br />
Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Ray Porter on April 01, 2004, 12:40pm<br />
The problem with Muing is that both engines must have both<br />
decoders set to run inthe same direction before setting the MU.<br />
If one was last running in the opposite direction then that is the<br />
way they will continue to run after the MU is set up. Using the<br />
bell or whistle will also sometimes cause another loco to<br />
suddeenly go into reverse - especially one controlled by a jump<br />
port. By pressing the jump button you can control the functions<br />
on the engine thus controlled at any time.<br />
Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Fritz on April 03, 2004, 03:04am<br />
NO.<br />
The manual is omitting the most important point on MUing.<br />
When setting up a back-to-back consist, select the lead or top<br />
address according to the manual.<br />
Then hit the MU-button.<br />
!Then set the direction lever in reverse!.<br />
Then continue according to the manual.<br />
There is NO need to change the NDOT<br />
in CV29.<br />
This holds true for UniVersal as well as well as for Advanced<br />
consisting.<br />
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by Fritz on April 03, 2004, 09:38am<br />
Ray,<br />
Before setting the reverse lever,<br />
enter the address of the trailing unit. (See the exclamation mark<br />
line of my previous posting.)<br />
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zephyr review<br />
Posted by raymond on April 04, 2004, 01:17pm<br />
Thanks, works every time following your procedure. Hope<br />
Digitrax are reading these postings. Now if only someone has a<br />
solution to the weird reversals when a funtion key is activated<br />
for a train on another port. I like the Zephyr but would probalby<br />
be happiest with an MRC Prodigy if it had the same programming<br />
capability. The knob on the Zephyr is pleasant to use but<br />
the MRC hand-helds are the most comforatable fit to my hand.<br />
Turntable Wiring<br />
Posted by Bill Stone on March 03, 2004, 04:45pm<br />
Thanks Dale, since I'm using DCC I'll order an auto reverser from<br />
Tony.<br />
Bill<br />
Re: Turntable Wiring<br />
Posted by Dale Gloer on March 05, 2004, 08:39am<br />
Bill,<br />
just a reminder that for the autoreverser to be effective and not<br />
operate too much, you should wire the exit tracks (those to the<br />
roundhouse) the same as the approach track(s) and use the<br />
autoreverser to connect only the turntable track.<br />
Dale.<br />
Turntable Wiring<br />
Posted by Bill Stone on March 02, 2004, 10:40pm<br />
Do I need to use an auto reverser?<br />
Or, do I simply connect the table rails to the approach tracks.<br />
Re: Turntable Wiring<br />
Posted by Dale Gloer on March 03, 2004, 08:46am<br />
You need a reversing scheme of some kind, either a manually<br />
operated DPDT switch wired for reversing polarity, or an<br />
automatic scheme which could be an autoreverser if your using<br />
DCC or some turntables have their power pick up through a split<br />
pit rail which takes care of the reversing function.<br />
Dale.<br />
<strong>Original</strong> Tony’s <strong>Train</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> <strong>Web</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>System</strong>, 1998-2007