ENGINE - Royal Australian Navy
ENGINE - Royal Australian Navy
ENGINE - Royal Australian Navy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 Future Environmental Policy Trends<br />
to 2020, Impact on Ship Design and<br />
Operation, Edited by Glenn Kerr and<br />
Barry Snushall, Sea power Centre,<br />
Australia, page 1.<br />
to keep up with the mod status of<br />
their parent European product line.<br />
In practice, Incremental Component<br />
Replacement is likely to be highly<br />
applicable to the building blocks<br />
of computer based control circuitry<br />
(such as software enhancements<br />
and printed logic cards). In the<br />
LHD, this type of control circuitry is<br />
all pervasive. Examples include the<br />
Communications suite, the Integrated<br />
Platform Management System<br />
(IPMS), High Voltage switching and<br />
conversion equipment and local<br />
control circuitry for hull, mechanical<br />
and electrical equipment. Based on<br />
current manufacturing trends, spare<br />
parts for this type of equipment are<br />
expected to be obsolete within two<br />
to five years of fit out.<br />
Apart from software based systems,<br />
the LHD's main power generation<br />
and propulsion systems are<br />
equally suited to the Incremental<br />
Component Replacement process.<br />
Equipped with three prime movers<br />
(1 x LM2500 and 2 x MAN Diesels)<br />
and two podded propulsors, the<br />
LHD's power plant resembles that<br />
of a modern cruise ship. Upgrades<br />
to these systems usually stem from<br />
a combination of OEM research and<br />
a steady stream of performance<br />
feedback from commercia l<br />
operators. From a supportability<br />
perspective, compliance with the<br />
OEM 's performance upgrade<br />
schedule can prevent major systems<br />
from morphing into logistic orphans,<br />
thereby ensuring commonality<br />
is maintained with the broader<br />
commercial fleet.<br />
But component replacement is<br />
not a panacea for all forms of<br />
obsolescence. For example, unless<br />
a combat system is designed for<br />
progressive software enhancements,<br />
system integration issues may lead<br />
to block upgrades or new fits which<br />
may be more cost effective.<br />
Similarly, in cases where<br />
obsolescence stems from regulatory<br />
forces, such as major changes<br />
to environmental legislation,<br />
incremental replacement may not<br />
be feasible. With the exception<br />
of control and monitoring<br />
software, COTS environmental<br />
systems are typically large, bulky<br />
treatment and processing plants.<br />
As these systems are engineered<br />
to meet specific legislative<br />
requirements, modification is<br />
often highly problematic and<br />
costly. Consequently, replacing<br />
these systems with an updated<br />
COTS model may be the most cost<br />
effective situation.<br />
To manage the Incremental<br />
Component Replacement process,<br />
one option which will be explored<br />
is Full Service Contracts with OEMs.<br />
Full Service Contracts target asset<br />
management rather than simply<br />
system maintenance, and are often<br />
used in the commercial maritime<br />
sector for systems which underscore<br />
ship availability. Configuration<br />
change to cope with obsolescence<br />
is seen as an ongoing process,<br />
with inventory managed by the OEM<br />
and maintained at the appropriate<br />
mod status. Possible LHD candidate<br />
systems for Full Service Contracts<br />
are the power plant, the podded<br />
propulsors, the IPMS, the combat<br />
system and the communications<br />
suite. For systems at high risk<br />
of regulatory obsolescence, an<br />
expansion of the services provided<br />
by the Classification Society is<br />
considered a viable strategy and<br />
is discussed in further detail in the<br />
next section.<br />
MAINTENANCE IN CLASS<br />
The third aspect of the LHD 's<br />
Sustain ment Strategy is Maintenance<br />
in Class. Maintenance in Class is<br />
the term used to describe a ship<br />
which is maintained in accordance<br />
with the rules and regulations set<br />
down by a Classification Society.<br />
In practice, Maintenance in Class<br />
means that the hull structure and<br />
a range of specific systems are<br />
regularly surveyed and inspected by<br />
a Classification Society. Inspections<br />
are also conducted on occurrence<br />
in the event of a major defect<br />
or system modification. Safety<br />
of Life at Sea (SaLAS) systems<br />
(e.g. firefighting, navigation, life<br />
saving), main propulsion and power<br />
generation systems, environmental<br />
systems and lifting appliances (boat<br />
cranes, lifts, hoists etc) are the<br />
mainstay of a ship's Master List of<br />
Surveyable Items. Combat systems<br />
and other military specific systems<br />
are not normally addressed by a<br />
Classification Society.<br />
In common with other ships in class,<br />
the primary benefit of maintaining<br />
the LHD in Class is that it offers the<br />
RAN third party external assurance<br />
regarding the fitness for purpose<br />
and safety of its equipment. As<br />
such, it can be a powerful tool in<br />
maintaining configuration control<br />
and in managing OEM relationships<br />
during repair and modification<br />
activities.<br />
However, beyond this shared benefit,<br />
Maintenance in Class is particularly<br />
relevant for the LHD given its large<br />
amount of COTS marine equipment,<br />
most notably SaLAS systems, the<br />
power plant and environmental<br />
systems. For example, the LHD is the<br />
first ship in the RAN that eschews<br />
the traditional 25 man canister life<br />
rafts and instead uses a commercial<br />
Mass Evacuation System (MES -<br />
trademarked as Marin Ark). The<br />
MES consists of just six 430 man<br />
life raft packs (three each side)<br />
which are accessed via a spiral<br />
chute. An additional two 109 man<br />
rafts are also fitted in the event of<br />
over capacity. As the RAN has no<br />
corporate knowledge or experience<br />
in maintaining or deploying aMES,<br />
a Classification Society could assist<br />
with developi ng this knowledge by<br />
providing the appropriate linkages<br />
to the commercial sector.<br />
In a similar vein, the RAN has<br />
no experience in operating and<br />
maintaining a large scale integrated<br />
full electric podded propu lsion<br />
plant. Given this is the marine<br />
power plant of choice for many<br />
cruise ships, access to commercial<br />
best operating and maintenance<br />
practices via a Classification Society<br />
could again assist the RAN in<br />
building its corporate knowledge and<br />
in reducing the costs of ownership of<br />
these systems.<br />
Furthermore, given the sizea ble<br />
environmental footprint of the<br />
LHD together with national and<br />
international trends towards<br />
more stringent environmental<br />
protection regulations' , access<br />
to a Classification Society's<br />
environmental services could assist