17.06.2013 Views

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OffshOre #2 | The Magazine<br />

MeerwInd – a fInancIal InvestOr wIth the wInd In hIs saIls<br />

“This location has charm”<br />

Offshore magazine: What motivates<br />

a financial investor like<br />

blackstone to invest in offshore<br />

wind power?<br />

Jens assheuer: in the first<br />

instance the private equity industry<br />

is interested in the size of<br />

the investment. We have a project<br />

volume of more than one billion<br />

euros here, with an equity capital<br />

requirement of several hundred<br />

million euros. These are the usual<br />

orders of magnitude for private<br />

equity firms like Blackstone.<br />

What made you choose, of all<br />

things, one of the most ambitious<br />

projects? 400 MW, 80 km<br />

from the shore – couldn’t you<br />

have found an easier project?<br />

apart from the nordergründe<br />

wind farm by energiekontor,<br />

there are hardly any small and<br />

nearshore projects in germany.<br />

nor are these smaller projects<br />

looking for equity. apart from<br />

that, the equity capital requirements<br />

for such projects are<br />

30<br />

Just in from northwestern Germany, JEnS ASShEUER arrives at Berlin’s central railway<br />

station in a relaxed mood. A meeting has been cancelled in Berlin, which means we can<br />

look for somewhere quiet in the nearby Mitte district to have the interview. Over cups of<br />

tea and mini satay skewers, the managing director of <strong>Wind</strong>MW in Bremerhaven explains<br />

the offshore plans of his majority shareholder Blackstone from New York.<br />

too small for an investor like<br />

Blackstone. So the question<br />

never arose.<br />

What are the plus points of<br />

Meerwind?<br />

Water depths of 22 to 26 metres<br />

are very moderate in comparison<br />

with 40 or 45 metres in other<br />

projects – this is reflected in<br />

the design and the costs of the<br />

foundation structures. We are<br />

only 12 nautical miles away from<br />

heligoland, which means we can<br />

carry out servicing and repairs<br />

from the island. Our reaction<br />

times are less than an hour. We<br />

would have to allow five to six<br />

hours by boat from the mainland.<br />

This location has charm.<br />

how many installers and<br />

technicians will you station on<br />

heligoland?<br />

We want to operate the wind farm<br />

ourselves from the outset and<br />

also carry out maintenance and<br />

repair work ourselves. We won’t<br />

know the exact number of techni-<br />

cians until our maintenance and<br />

service plan is finalised.<br />

You compared a large number of<br />

projects before the purchase in<br />

July 2008. how do they differ<br />

from each other?<br />

Because the feed-in tariff under<br />

the german Renewable energy<br />

Sources act (eeg) varies according<br />

to the distance from the<br />

shore and water depth, there is<br />

no longer any easy distinction<br />

between good and bad projects.<br />

The eeg does a good job of<br />

evening that out. The status of<br />

project development was more<br />

important to us. if you buy a<br />

project today, the earliest you<br />

can build in 2012. The investors<br />

have to come up with significant<br />

supplier contracts and financial<br />

resources before transpower,<br />

formerly e.On netz, will lay the<br />

grid connection in the north Sea.<br />

This work has a lead time of up<br />

to 36 months. The timeline is the<br />

most critical point.<br />

MeerwInd Ost/sÜd OffshOre wInd farMs<br />

The Meerwind Ost/Süd offshore wind farms (Meerwind) are situated 12 nautical miles (23 kilometres)<br />

to the north of heligoland and 50 miles (80 kilometres) from the north German coast. <strong>Wind</strong>MW, based<br />

in Bremerhaven, is responsible for the planning. Blackstone has an 80 percent stake in the company<br />

and <strong>Wind</strong>land Energiezeugung owns 20 percent. The project was granted approval by the German<br />

Federal Maritime and hydrographic Agency (BSh) in hamburg on 16 May 2007. The nordsee Ost (Essent/RWE<br />

Innogy and Amrumbank West (E.On) wind farms are situated directly next in the north to<br />

Meerwind. Their shared power transmission line will be routed via the Brunsbüttel connection point.<br />

The Meerwind project is formally divided into two wind farms. In each case 40 turbines with 3.6 or<br />

5 MW are to be constructed in Meerwind Ost and Meerwind Süd. The project is being funded via a<br />

project financing model. <strong>Wind</strong>MW engaged KfW-IPEX and dexia to prepare the project financing.<br />

What is the range of annual full<br />

load hours that can be attained<br />

and what is your estimate for<br />

Meerwind?<br />

The equivalent full load hours are<br />

in the region of 3,800.<br />

since blackstone’s involvement<br />

was announced in summer<br />

2008, nothing more has been<br />

heard about the project. What<br />

stage is the technical planning<br />

currently at?<br />

There have already been talks<br />

and negotiations with the main<br />

suppliers, and the plans for<br />

maintenance and operation have<br />

progressed well. We have also<br />

begun preparing everything to<br />

satisfy e.On’s grid connection<br />

conditions and hence secure a<br />

promise of a grid connection.<br />

Which wind turbines will be<br />

used? Originally 3.6-MW turbines<br />

were planned.<br />

We are investigating both a 288<br />

MW and a 400 MW option.<br />

do you see any big differences<br />

between manufacturers?<br />

The turbine manufacturers have<br />

not yet come as far as they should<br />

have done. They have not ramped<br />

up capacities sufficiently yet and<br />

their sub-suppliers also have not<br />

made sufficient investments. Besides<br />

that, the turbines’ test run<br />

times are too short. One to three<br />

years of operational experience<br />

is not much for a technology that<br />

is supposed to withstand more<br />

than 20 years of extreme weather<br />

conditions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!