Final Report.CDR - National Institute of health and family welfare
Final Report.CDR - National Institute of health and family welfare
Final Report.CDR - National Institute of health and family welfare
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PART FOUR - REACTION LEVEL EVALUATION<br />
The participants were given a questionnaire on the Reaction Level<br />
Evaluation at the end <strong>of</strong> the training to assess the extent to which the<br />
training programme met its objectives. Given below are the responses given<br />
by the participants:<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Reaction Level Evaluation:<br />
An analysis <strong>of</strong> the Reaction level by the participants on various variables<br />
revealed that the training course was successful. Some <strong>of</strong> the findings <strong>of</strong><br />
the Reaction level Evaluation are as below:<br />
•60% participants rated very good <strong>and</strong> about 35% rated excellent with<br />
regard to whether the goals <strong>and</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the training were<br />
relevant with reference to the needs <strong>of</strong> the participants (Table-I).<br />
•About 45% participants rated very good with respect to the variable<br />
“goals <strong>and</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the training programme”; 28% rated as excellent<br />
<strong>and</strong> about 18% as very good for the same. (Table-II)<br />
•40 % participants rated the background material provided during the<br />
training course to be relevant to topics <strong>and</strong> sessions as very good <strong>and</strong> 35<br />
% rated it as excellent for the same.(Table-III).<br />
•About 45% stated that the training course provided very good current<br />
<strong>and</strong> latest knowledge <strong>and</strong> 35% rated as excellent with regards to this<br />
variable (Table-IV).<br />
•24% rated excellent when asked about the extent to which the sessions<br />
were stimulating <strong>and</strong> 43% rated as very good for the same (Table-V).<br />
•60% rated the general organization <strong>of</strong> the training course as very good,<br />
10% as excellent <strong>and</strong> approximately 25% as good (Table-VI).<br />
33