Download - OAR@ICRISAT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Inorganic salt composiilon ol different plant tlssue culture media uwd in the present study. Concentration in rng L" NH,NO, KNO, KHaPO, MgS0,.7H,O NaH,PO,.H,O (NHJ,.SO, CaC1,.2H,O FeS0..7H,O (EDTA) Na,EDTA EDTA Ferric salt Thlamine.HCI Pyrldoxine.HCI Nicotinic acid Myo-lnositol Sucrose (9) 25.00 20.00 30.00 PH a Phillips and Collins (1979) b Gambora et al. (1 968) c ~urashiie and skoog (1962) 5.6 5.5 5.8
A compehenslve llst of whole plant rogonerallon In some lmportanl legume species Type 01 Speclea regenorallon Explant Reference Forage rnd Tree Legumes: lob cornlculafus Org. LP, Ca, cc, Ahulaetal. 1983. Nlbekl and SaHo 1986, Orshlnsky elol. 1983, Damlanl et al. 1985, Swanson etal. 1980 Emb. L Arclonl and MarloM 1982 Medicago sps. Org. A, IN, H, IMO, Sounders and Blngham 1972, Kao and Mlchayluk ST, S, P, L, C, 1981, Walker et al. 1978 & 1979, sanlos et 01.1980, R, Hy, LP, 0 Brown and Alanossov 1985, Lupono 1983 6 1986, Nagoralan etal. 1986. Bingham et al. 1975. Marlom et al. 1984, Kuchuk et al. 1990, Blanch1 el al. 1986, Skolnlckl 1986 Emb. 1, LP, R, H, C, Denchev 1991, Arclonl el al. 1982, Gllmour el at. 0. P. St SI 1987, Nagoralan and Wallon 1987. Hahan el at. 1984, Relrch and Blngham 1980, Yu et 01. 1990, Blonchl el al. 19.58, Meller and Brown 19870, Senoratno el al. 1989. Kao and Mlchoyluk 1981, Lotunde-Dada and Lucas 1988, and Johnson etal. 1981 Trifollum sas Ora. Sd. Sh. HCa. A. PhllllmandColllns 1979.OleckandSchleder 1983. Emb. H, C. H, R. P, A. ca, SC, ZE Bholwanl el al. 1984, Ywnada and Hlguchl 1990, podenon 1986, ~oyeselol. IPW, Colllnsand rnltllps 1982, Maheswarm and Wlllkms 1986b, Phllllprand Colllns 1980, BhoJwanIet al. 1984. McGw at al. 1989 Stylownther sps Org. H, L, R, LP, C, L MelJer and Brotghton 1981, Meller and Stdnblss 1983, Godwln et al. 1987, Mroglnskl and Kaftha 1981b,Smbdosad ha, 1986. Mam~tlmd Way 1989, Manners 19W Troo Legumes: Alblzla spr Org. H, R Gharyal and Maheshwad 1981 6 1993. Tomar and Gupta 19M Emb. H Gharyd and MahwhwarlI98l. lomar and Gupta 1986 Acacla sps Org. Jones et al. 1990 Pforoplr rpr Org. Nandwanl a d Ramawd 1992 conlfnud..
Page 1 and 2: Application of Somaclonal Variation
Page 3 and 4: DECLARATION The research work embod
Page 5 and 6: Depaltment of Botany, 0.U) for beln
Page 7 and 8: US OF TABLES Between Pages Inorgani
Page 9 and 10: 21 Source of variation for the yiel
Page 11 and 12: 4 A Mature cotyledon of C. cajan cv
Page 13 and 14: No Tie i b UST OF FIGURES 1 lnlluen
Page 15 and 16: evollian of the thearetic01 asprt.
Page 17 and 18: used for identification of randomly
Page 19 and 20: on culture induced vs mutagen induc
Page 21 and 22: egions could resun in various anora
Page 23 and 24: In their efforts to select for Fusa
Page 25 and 26: Herftable resislance to non-specUlc
Page 27 and 28: profdn. They observed 23 ol91 mutog
Page 29 and 30: following plant rogoneration In 9 d
Page 31 and 32: per spike, kernel weight, yidd, tot
Page 33 and 34: ange from 11.5 to 39.5% and a tende
Page 35 and 36: nultlplo shoots, dwarts, abnormal l
Page 37 and 38: waxiness. glume and grain colour, g
Page 39 and 40: 2.2 MOLECULAR STUDIES OF SOMACLONAL
Page 41 and 42: one regenerant which was hetetozygo
Page 43 and 44: when hybddizatlon pattern of regene
Page 45 and 46: 2.3 TISSUE CUlWRE AND REGENERATION
Page 47: lomuldlon has Increased concenhatlo
Page 51 and 52: TYPO Of Spocler regoneratlon Explan
Page 53 and 54: cotyledons. Rwna et al. (1992) rege
Page 55 and 56: 3. TISSUE CULTURE AND REGENERNION I
Page 57 and 58: Immature cotyledon explants obfdned
Page 59 and 60: cultured on MS semi-sdid medium sup
Page 61 and 62: In vltro grown seedllngs were used
Page 63 and 64: Three weeks after culture all the g
Page 65: PLATE 1 1 A. Callused cotyledonary
Page 68 and 69: PLATE 2
Page 70 and 71: 3A. Mature imbibed cotyledon ot C.
Page 72 and 73: 4A. lvlature colyiedo~? of CJ cujar
Page 74 and 75: Effect of different hormonal comb~n
Page 76 and 77: E 9 Cuiture Period (weegsj NO shoot
Page 78 and 79: PLATE 5
Page 80: IncreoJng the doses of rlrradlation
Page 84 and 85: 3.3 DISCUSSION Auxins In the presen
Page 86 and 87: axes when cultured on MS medium sup
Page 88 and 89: In the present investigation the In
Page 90 and 91: oMaln cotyledonary node tissue of s
Page 92 and 93: Bama and Wakhiu (1994) oberved high
Page 94 and 95: species producing pdyphenols In cul
Page 96 and 97: 4 ASSESSMENT OF SOMACLONAL VARIATIO
Page 98 and 99:
a RI Generafton: The R1 plants grow
Page 100 and 101:
Seed number per pod: Total number o
Page 102 and 103:
4.2 RESULTS 4.21 SOMACLONAL VARIATI
Page 105:
Phenotyprc variation in the field g
Page 108 and 109:
Frequency of phenotvplc varlation s
Page 110 and 111:
Table 8 Genotypic varlation in qual
Page 112 and 113:
Figure:i Ward's minimum variance de
Page 114:
Cluster means for the yleld paramet
Page 119 and 120:
Analysis of varlance for various yi
Page 121 and 122:
4.23 GAMMA-lRUD1ATED VS UN-IWADIAlE
Page 123 and 124:
Cluster means lor the yield paramet
Page 126 and 127:
Cluster means for the yield paramet
Page 128 and 129:
lowed ped incidence groups. Althoug
Page 130 and 131:
Analysis of varlance (GLM) for varl
Page 132 and 133:
with hawest index having the least
Page 134 and 135:
Table 22 Source of variation lor th
Page 136 and 137:
Phenolyplc cndgenofypic vorfollon f
Page 138 and 139:
PLATE 8
Page 140 and 141:
Table 25 Comparlson of Hellcoverpa
Page 142 and 143:
Fimnotyplc varkrfion torquditailve
Page 144 and 145:
mutations from recessive to dominan
Page 146 and 147:
The plants regenerated hom gamma in
Page 148 and 149:
ecovery ot such agronomically usefu
Page 150 and 151:
The dilferenltal exprdon d tomaclon
Page 152 and 153:
Ealy maturlty wor obtwed In malze b
Page 154 and 155:
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF SOMACLONAL PR
Page 156 and 157:
5.1.3 DNA AMPUFICATION AND PCR COND
Page 158:
Fruciionation of PCR prod~rcfs of t
Page 161 and 162:
5.3 DISCUSSION Among the varlants s
Page 163 and 164:
GENERAL DISCUSSION Chapter 6 The pr
Page 165 and 166:
thw to rnetaboliw BA quite efllclml
Page 167 and 168:
which adsoltx hydroxymelhyl-fuhrral
Page 169 and 170:
this study there has been no r.pott
Page 171 and 172:
fu- develop somaclonal lines usable
Page 173 and 174:
Due to the lack d sufficient geneti
Page 175 and 176:
of DNA sequences have been obwwed I
Page 177 and 178:
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Chapter 7 T
Page 179 and 180:
tho pufative somaclones with agrono
Page 181 and 182:
or large pod bearing length per bra
Page 183 and 184:
Preliminary analysis of the putativ
Page 185 and 186:
Bootliein, DA and McDanW, R.G. 1987
Page 187 and 188:
Brown, P.T.H and Lkz, H. 1986. Meth
Page 189 and 190:
Ween, LS., SMhman, D.D and Rlnw, H.
Page 191 and 192:
Franklln C.I., Revw, N., Gronzales,
Page 193 and 194:
Groacs, R.W., and Binghcm, E.T. (19
Page 195 and 196:
Johnson, L.B., SMenllle, D.1, Schla
Page 197 and 198:
KWy, W and H.J. Jacabson. 1990. Som
Page 199 and 200:
Maddock, S.E. RWott, R., Pomr, S.,
Page 201 and 202:
Mdns, F., Jr. 1983. Heritable varia
Page 203 and 204:
Niizeki, M., ishikawa, R and Sdto,
Page 205 and 206:
Powell. W., Hayter, A.M. Wood, W, D
Page 207 and 208:
Sanlos, A.V.P. dm, Outka, D.E., Coc
Page 209 and 210:
Sun, Z., Zhao. C., Zheng, K., Qi, X
Page 211 and 212:
Yu, K., Chdme, 0.R and Pwls, K.P. 1
Page 213 and 214:
The letter 'R' in this study indica
Page 215:
Presentations: PRASANNA LATHA, CH.,
show all

Download - OAR@ICRISAT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?