22.06.2013 Views

Syntax of the Bi Comparative Construction in Mandarin Chinese

Syntax of the Bi Comparative Construction in Mandarin Chinese

Syntax of the Bi Comparative Construction in Mandarin Chinese

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Syntax</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bi</strong> <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Construction</strong> <strong>in</strong> Mandar<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

(53) (Hs<strong>in</strong>g 2003:76)<br />

CP<br />

3<br />

Opi[+wh] C’<br />

3<br />

C FP<br />

2<br />

wh-phrase F’<br />

2<br />

F’ IP (elided)<br />

2<br />

I’<br />

2<br />

I<br />

32<br />

[E]<br />

(54) (Hs<strong>in</strong>g 2003: 77)<br />

VP<br />

2<br />

V CP<br />

2<br />

Spec C’<br />

g 2<br />

Opi[Q] C FP<br />

shi 2<br />

DP F’<br />

g 2<br />

shei F IP (elided)<br />

qp<br />

Zhangsan zuotian yujian ti<br />

In sluic<strong>in</strong>g sentences, E feature makes wh-adjunct moved out, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> left elements<br />

are deleted <strong>in</strong> PF level. Hence, <strong>the</strong> wh-phrase is left. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>in</strong> BCC <strong>the</strong><br />

deleted part is wh-phrase. Consequently, we cannot suppose FP <strong>in</strong> BCC have similar<br />

characters.<br />

中正大學 e-Thesys (94 學年度)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!