Volume 60 - Tomato Genetics Cooperative - University of Florida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conclusion The earliest breeding efforts for tomato resistance to bacterial wilt started in Puerto Rico and two American States (North Carolina, Hawaii) 80 years ago followed by programs in the 1950s in Japan and the Philippines. The programs carried out by French research institutes in the Caribbean (and Burkina Faso) started during the course of the 1960s, whereas AVRDC started at the beginning of the 1970s. There were many exchanges of material between the breeding programs for bacterial wilt resistance carried out in several US States, and between them and the Philippines. AVRDC is using and recombining now the resistances bred in the USA, the Philippines and the French West Indies. The breeding material created in Japan was mostly used locally, and perhaps also in Guadeloupe, if one assumes that the Japanese line „OTB2‟ is equivalent to „CRA66‟, which is not certain. Our attempt to draw a general picture of the main sources of resistance to bacterial wilt, of the main breeding programs for this resistance, of their most frequently mentioned resistant varieties, and of the relationships between varieties, is based on a careful work of assembling bits and pieces dispersed in many publications. Given the unavailability of complete information, it is not now possible to come up with a better picture than the one we present here, though more information can emerge out of archives of the scientists, Universities and research institutes involved. Henceforth the synthesis provided here displays the most probable general picture, but it may include some mistakes in the absence of further information. We added to this survey complementary information on some peculiarities of tomato bacterial wilt resistance. The frequent association of bacterial wilt resistance with resistance to other bacterial or fungal diseases should be of strong interest for breeding and/or research on its genetic basis. Breeding over many decades succeeded in eliminating a number of undesirable traits initially associated to high level of bacterial wilt resistance, but breeding efforts are still ongoing for obtaining large fruit size in resistant material. The adaptation of the breeding material to hot environmental conditions is often mentioned as necessary for obtaining breeding lines which are resistant and agronomically acceptable. On the whole, we hope this paper to be useful for further research using the plant material mentioned, in particular for comparative genetic studies and breeding concerning the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt and to other vascular diseases. Acknowledgments The authors are very grateful to Ph. Prior and E. Wicker (phyto-bacteriologists at CIRAD La Réunion Island, Mascarenes) for having motivated the authors to write this historical review, to F. Kaan and G. Anaïs (retirees of INRA Guadeloupe) for having provided precious complements of information, to H. Fukuoka (National Institute of Vegetables & Tea Science, Tsu, Mie, Japan) for having fully clarified the relationships between former Japanese scientists, former Japanese Institutes and tomato lines and for having translated key passages of Suzuki et al. (1964). We thank also the consortium of private companies (Vilmorin, Gautier Semences, DeRuiter Seeds, Enza Zaden, Nunhems, Rijk Zwaan) who financed (2007-2010) research based on the present review. Last but not least, we acknowledge Ch. Olivier (librarian of INRA GAFL, Montfavet, France), M.L. 18
Abinne (librarian at INRA-CRAAG, Guadeloupe),and the librarians at North Carolina State University, the University of Hawaii, AVRDC, and the University of Puerto Rico along with Linda Wessel-Beaver for having provided reprints of numerous archives. Acronyms found in some names of tomato lines or in related literature UPR: University of Puerto Rico NCSU: North Carolina State University UPLB = UPCA: University of Philippines Los Banos = University of Philippines College of Agriculture CRA: Centre de Recherche Agronomique des Antilles (INRA) 19
Page 1 and 2: Report of the Tomato Genetics Coope
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Foreword 2 Announ
Page 5 and 6: Upcoming meetings: February 17-19,
Page 7 and 8: Opena et al., 1989; Celine et al.,
Page 9 and 10: esistant lines, a specific bitter t
Page 11 and 12: esistance and very large fruit (Sco
Page 13 and 14: esistance and agro-climatic adaptat
Page 15 and 16: esistance, and breeding in geograph
Page 17: acteria (vascular or not) and even
Page 21 and 22: origin Table 1. Summing up of the p
Page 23 and 24: Literature cited 1. Acosta J.C., 19
Page 25 and 26: complex. C. Allen, P. Prior and C.
Page 27 and 28: 63. Mew T.W., Ho W.C., 1977. Effect
Page 29: 93. Wang, J.-F., P. Hanson, and J.A
Page 37: Figure 9 : Pedigree of ‘CRA74’,
Page 42 and 43: provide a rationale for pyramiding
Page 44 and 45: was evaluated in relation to the pa
Page 46 and 47: The parents had average DSIs of 0.6
Page 48 and 49: The average DSI for RS families wit
Page 50 and 51: Combinations of introgressions Ty3a
Page 52 and 53: Literature Cited: Abinder, I., Reuv
Page 54 and 55: Research Papers TGC REPORT VOLUME 6
Page 56 and 57: tomatoes and peppers grown in the f
Page 58 and 59: Research Papers TGC REPORT VOLUME 6
Page 60 and 61: flowers have smaller and lighter gr
Page 62 and 63: Stoeva P., Dimaculangan 2 D., Radko
Page 64 and 65: Fig. 4: CLSM photographs of epiderm
Page 66 and 67: Revised List of Wild Species Stocks
Page 68 and 69:
S. cheesmaniae (L. cheesmanii) LA04
Page 70 and 71:
S. chilense (L. chilense) LA2767 Ch
Page 72 and 73:
S. chmielewskii (L. chmielewskii) L
Page 74 and 75:
S. galapagense (L. cheesmanii f. mi
Page 76 and 77:
S. habrochaites (L. hirsutum, L. hi
Page 78 and 79:
S. lycopersicoides LA4130 Pachica (
Page 80 and 81:
S. lycopersicum (L. esculentum var.
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
S. ochranthum LA2166 Pacopampa Caja
Page 88 and 89:
S. peruvianum (L. peruvianum) LA153
Page 90 and 91:
S. pimpinellifolium (L. pimpinellif
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Appendix. Wild species core collect
Page 98 and 99:
98 S. lyc. cerasiforme LA4133 LA024
Page 100 and 101:
SolCAP LA2675 LA2744 LA2779 LA2788
Page 102 and 103:
Coulibaly, Sylvaine Nunhems USA, 70
Page 104 and 105:
McCaslin, Mark FLF Tomatoes, 18591
Page 106 and 107:
Stommel, John USDA-ARS, Genetic Imp
show all

Volume 60 - Tomato Genetics Cooperative - University of Florida

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?