Volume 60 - Tomato Genetics Cooperative - University of Florida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

78. Scott, J.W., Jones J.B., Somodi G.C., 2003. Development of a large fruited tomato with a high level of resistance to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). Rept. Tomato Genet. Coop 53:36-37. 79. Scott, J.W., Jones J.B., Somodi G.C., Chellemi D.O., Olson S.M., 1995a. „Neptune‟, a heat-tolerant, bacterial wilt-tolerant tomato. HortScience 30(3):641-642. 80. Scott, J.W., Jones J.B., Somodi G.C., Stall R.E., 1995b. Screening tomato accessions for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, race T3. HortScience 30(3):579-581. 81. Scott, J.W., Jones J. B., Vallad G. E., 2010. Breeding for Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Tomato: The Struggle Continues. Proc. 25th Annual Tomato Disease Workshop. P.19[Abstr.] 82. Scott J.W., Somodi G.C., Jones J.B., 1988. Bacterial spot resistance is not associated with bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 101: 390-392. 83 Scott, J.W., G.E. Vallad, and J.B. Jones. 2009. High level of resistance to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) obtained in large-fruited tomato breeding lines derived from Hawaii 7997. Acta Horticulturae 808:269-274. 84. Scott, J.W., J.F. Wang, and P.M. Hanson. 2005. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt, a global view. In: Proceeding of the First International Symposium on Tomato Diseases, Orlando, Florida, USA. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 695:161-172. 85. Sonoda R.M., Augustine J.J., Volin R.B., 1979. Bacterial wilt of tomato in Florida: history, status, and sources of resistance. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Sci. 92:100-102. 86. Suzuki, I., Sugahara, Y., Kotani, A., Todaka, S., and Shimada, H. 1964. Studies on breeding eggplants and tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt. I. Investigations on method of evaluating the resistance and on the source of resistance in eggplants and tomatoes. Bulletin-Horticultural Research Station Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Series A 3:77-106. 87. Theis T., 1950. Tomato diseases. Puerto Rico Univ. Agr. Expt. Sta., Ann. Rpt. (1950): 9. 88. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Laterrot, H., and Grimsley, N. 1996a. Quantitative trait Loci determining Resistance to Bacterial Wilt in Tomato Cultivar Hawaii7996. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 9:826-836. 89. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Prior, P., Anaïs, G., Mangin, B., Bazin, B., Nazer, R., and Grimsley, N. 1996b. Polygenic resistance of tomato plants to bacterial wilt in the French West Indies. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 9:837-842. 90. Thurston H.D., 1976. Resistance to bacterial wilt (Pseudomonas solanacearum). Proc. 1rst Int. Conference and Worskshop on the ecology and control of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Raleigh, July 1976: 58-62. 91. Vaneechoutte M, Kämpfer P, De Baere T, Falsen E, Verschraegen G. 2004. Wautersia gen. nov., a novel genus accommodating the phylogenetic lineage including Ralstonia eutropha and related species, and proposal of Ralstonia [Pseudomonas] syzygii (Roberts et al. 1990) comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 54(Pt 2):317-27. 92. Walter J.M., 1967. Hereditary resistance to disease in tomato. Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol.5: 131-162. 28
93. Wang, J.-F., P. Hanson, and J.A. Barnes. 1998. Worldwide evaluation of an international set of resistance sources to bacterial wilt in tomato. In: P. Prior, C. Allen and J. Elphinstone (eds.), Bacterial Wilt Disease: Molecular and Ecological Aspects, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 269-275. 94. Wang, J. F., Olivier, J., Thoquet, P., Mangin, B., Sauviac, L., and Grimsley, N. H. 2000. Resistance of tomato line Hawaii7996 to Ralstonia solanacearum Pss4 in Taiwan is controlled mainly by a major strain-specific locus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 13 (1):6-13. 95. Wang HanRong; Ru ShuiJiang; Wang LianPing; Fang Li; Ren HaiYing; Feng ZhongMen, 2009. Control of tomato bacterial wilt with grafting. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis 21(3): 283-287. 96. Warmke H.E., Cruzado H.J., 1949. Tomato breeding. Puerto Rico Fed. Expt. Sta. Ann. Rpt. For 1949: 9. 97. Wicker E., Grassart L., Coranson-Beaudu R., Mian D., Guilbaud C., Fegan M., Prior P., 2007. Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Martinique (French West Indies) exhibiting a new pathogenic potential. Appl. & Environ. Microbiology 73(21): 6790- 6801. 98. Winstead N.N., Kelman A., 1952. Inoculation techniques for evaluating resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 42: 628-634. 99. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H, Yano I, Hotta H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Arakawa M. 1992. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol.36(12):1251-75. 100.Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Yano I, Hotta H, Nishiuchi Y. 1995. Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. Nov.: Proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleroni and Doudoroff 1973) comb. Nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. Nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb. Nov.Microbiol Immunol. 39(11): 897-904. 101.Yarnell S.H., 1948. The southern tomato exchange program. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 52: 375-382. 29
Page 1 and 2: Report of the Tomato Genetics Coope
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Foreword 2 Announ
Page 5 and 6: Upcoming meetings: February 17-19,
Page 7 and 8: Opena et al., 1989; Celine et al.,
Page 9 and 10: esistant lines, a specific bitter t
Page 11 and 12: esistance and very large fruit (Sco
Page 13 and 14: esistance and agro-climatic adaptat
Page 15 and 16: esistance, and breeding in geograph
Page 17 and 18: acteria (vascular or not) and even
Page 19 and 20: Abinne (librarian at INRA-CRAAG, Gu
Page 21 and 22: origin Table 1. Summing up of the p
Page 23 and 24: Literature cited 1. Acosta J.C., 19
Page 25 and 26: complex. C. Allen, P. Prior and C.
Page 27: 63. Mew T.W., Ho W.C., 1977. Effect
Page 37: Figure 9 : Pedigree of ‘CRA74’,
Page 42 and 43: provide a rationale for pyramiding
Page 44 and 45: was evaluated in relation to the pa
Page 46 and 47: The parents had average DSIs of 0.6
Page 48 and 49: The average DSI for RS families wit
Page 50 and 51: Combinations of introgressions Ty3a
Page 52 and 53: Literature Cited: Abinder, I., Reuv
Page 54 and 55: Research Papers TGC REPORT VOLUME 6
Page 56 and 57: tomatoes and peppers grown in the f
Page 58 and 59: Research Papers TGC REPORT VOLUME 6
Page 60 and 61: flowers have smaller and lighter gr
Page 62 and 63: Stoeva P., Dimaculangan 2 D., Radko
Page 64 and 65: Fig. 4: CLSM photographs of epiderm
Page 66 and 67: Revised List of Wild Species Stocks
Page 68 and 69: S. cheesmaniae (L. cheesmanii) LA04
Page 70 and 71: S. chilense (L. chilense) LA2767 Ch
Page 72 and 73: S. chmielewskii (L. chmielewskii) L
Page 74 and 75: S. galapagense (L. cheesmanii f. mi
Page 76 and 77: S. habrochaites (L. hirsutum, L. hi
Page 78 and 79:
S. lycopersicoides LA4130 Pachica (
Page 80 and 81:
S. lycopersicum (L. esculentum var.
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
S. ochranthum LA2166 Pacopampa Caja
Page 88 and 89:
S. peruvianum (L. peruvianum) LA153
Page 90 and 91:
S. pimpinellifolium (L. pimpinellif
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Appendix. Wild species core collect
Page 98 and 99:
98 S. lyc. cerasiforme LA4133 LA024
Page 100 and 101:
SolCAP LA2675 LA2744 LA2779 LA2788
Page 102 and 103:
Coulibaly, Sylvaine Nunhems USA, 70
Page 104 and 105:
McCaslin, Mark FLF Tomatoes, 18591
Page 106 and 107:
Stommel, John USDA-ARS, Genetic Imp
show all

Volume 60 - Tomato Genetics Cooperative - University of Florida

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?