212 PAULO TIRAO K ρ1 (0,−1,1) = Ker(B2 + I) ∩ Ker(B3 − I) Im(B2 − I) ∩ Im(B3 + I) we write down the kernels and the images in the canonical basis {e1, e2} of Z 2 . We have Ker(B1 + I) = 〈e1, e2〉 Im(B1 − I) = 〈2e1, 2e2〉 Ker(B2 + I) = 〈e1 − e2〉 Im(B2 − I) = 〈e1 − e2〉 Ker(B3 − I) = 〈e1 − e2〉 Im(B3 + I) = 〈e1 − e2〉, from which it follows that K ρ1 (−1,0,1) Z2 and K ρ1 (0,−1,1) = 0. The computation of these invariants (Proposition 2.1) for all the representations in Proposition 2.2 and for the representations µ and ν in (2.2) are as simple as those performed above. Thus, we put together the results as a lemma, omitting the details. Lemma 2.3. Let ρ be a representation equivalent to χi or ρi, (1 ≤ i ≤ 3) as in Proposition 2.2 or equivalent to µ or ν as in (2.2). Then, (a) K ρ (1,−1,−1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ1, ρ2, ρ3, µ; if ρ χ2, χ3, ρ1, ν; (b) K ρ (−1,1,−1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ2, ρ1, ρ3, µ; if ρ χ1, χ3, ρ2, ν; (c) K ρ (−1,−1,1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ3, ρ1, ρ2, µ; if ρ χ1, χ2, ρ3, ν; (d) K ρ (0,1,−1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ2, ρ3, µ; if ρ χ1, χ3, ρ1, ρ2, ν; (e) K ρ (0,−1,1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ3, ρ2, µ; if ρ χ1, χ2, ρ1, ρ3, ν; (f) K ρ (0,−1,−1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ1, ρ3, µ; if ρ χ2, χ3, ρ1, ρ2, ν; (g) K ρ (1,0,−1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ1, ρ3, µ; if ρ χ2, χ3, ρ1, ρ2, ν; (h) K ρ (−1,0,1) = Z2, 0, if ρ χ3, ρ1; if ρ χ1, χ2, ρ2, ρ3, µ, ν;
(i) K ρ (−1,0,−1) = (j) K ρ (−1,1,0) = (k) K ρ (1,−1,0) = (l) K ρ (−1,−1,0) = PRIMITIVE Z2 ⊕ Z2-MANIFOLDS 213 Z2, if ρ χ2, ρ1, ρ3, µ; 0, if ρ χ1, χ3, ρ2, ν; Z2, if ρ χ2, ρ1; 0, if ρ χ1, χ3, ρ2, ρ3, µ, ν; Z2, if ρ χ1, ρ2, µ; 0, if ρ χ2, χ3, ρ1, ρ3, ν; Z2, if ρ χ3, ρ1, ρ2, µ; 0, if ρ χ1, χ2, ρ3, ν. Corollary 2.4. The representations µ and ν are not equivalent. Proof. The result follows from Proposition 2.1 and Equation (a) in the previous lemma. Corollary 2.5. The representations µ and ν are indecomposable. Proof. Being ν of rank 3, if decomposable, it must be ν χj1 ⊕ χj2 ⊕ χj3 , for 1 ≤ j1, j2, j3 ≤ 3 or ν χj1 ⊕ ρj2 , for 1 ≤ j1, j2 ≤ 3. But Equations (a), (b) and (c) in Lemma 2.3 contradict both possibilities. The case of µ is similar. We had encountered 8 indecomposable representations of Z2 ⊕ Z2 having no fixed points. The following theorem asserts that there are no more. Recall that they are given by (2.3) B1 B2 B3 χ1 : (1) (−1) (−1) χ2 : (−1) (1) (−1) χ3 : (−1) (−1) (1) ρ1 : −I J −J ρ2 : J −I −J ρ3 : J −J −1 1 −1 −I 1 −1 1 µ : ν : −1 0 0 0 1 1 0 −1 1 0 1 0 −1 0 −1 −1 0 −1 0 1 −1 0 −1 −1 0 1 1 −1 −1 −1 0 . −1 Theorem 2.6. Let ρ be an indecomposable integral representation of Z2⊕Z2 having no fixed points. Then ρ is equivalent to one and only one of the representations in (2.3). The proof of Theorem 2.6 is elementary but not trivial. In order to make the paper more readable, we wrote the proof in the forthcoming subsection. By assuming Theorem 2.6 one can skip the following subsection without losing the understanding of the whole paper.
- Page 1 and 2:
Pacific Journal of Mathematics Volu
- Page 3 and 4:
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 5 and 6:
EIGENVALUES ASYMPTOTICS 3 (i) If pm
- Page 7 and 8:
EIGENVALUES ASYMPTOTICS 5 Corollary
- Page 9 and 10:
Thus, by the Itô formula, we have
- Page 11 and 12:
Therefore, K1(t) ≡ t 2−d/2 ≤
- Page 13 and 14:
EIGENVALUES ASYMPTOTICS 11 The chan
- Page 15 and 16:
EIGENVALUES ASYMPTOTICS 13 Here Res
- Page 17 and 18:
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 19 and 20:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 17 Table
- Page 21 and 22:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 19 and t
- Page 23 and 24:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 21 Propo
- Page 25 and 26:
〈σ 〈σ〉 〈σ, τ〉 2 〈1
- Page 27 and 28:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 25 Then
- Page 29 and 30:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 27 were
- Page 31 and 32:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 29 Thus
- Page 33:
IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS 31 [3] ,
- Page 36 and 37:
34 CARINA BOYALLIAN spherical serie
- Page 38 and 39:
36 CARINA BOYALLIAN Here I G MAN (
- Page 40 and 41:
38 CARINA BOYALLIAN where k ≤ [ n
- Page 42 and 43:
40 CARINA BOYALLIAN The case G = Sp
- Page 44 and 45:
42 CARINA BOYALLIAN we can, since i
- Page 46 and 47:
44 CARINA BOYALLIAN and this formul
- Page 48 and 49:
46 CARINA BOYALLIAN Here, J(ν) int
- Page 50 and 51:
48 CARINA BOYALLIAN [V] D. Vogan, R
- Page 52 and 53:
50 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 54 and 55:
52 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 56 and 57:
54 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 58 and 59:
56 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 60 and 61:
58 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 62 and 63:
60 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 64 and 65:
62 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 66 and 67:
64 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 68 and 69:
66 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 70 and 71:
68 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 72 and 73:
70 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 74 and 75:
72 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 76 and 77:
74 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 78 and 79:
76 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 80 and 81:
78 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 82 and 83:
80 ROBERT F. BROWN AND HELGA SCHIRM
- Page 84 and 85:
82 GILLES CARRON à l’infini s’
- Page 86 and 87:
84 GILLES CARRON isométriques au d
- Page 88 and 89:
86 GILLES CARRON Comme D est ellipt
- Page 90 and 91:
88 GILLES CARRON Réciproquement si
- Page 92 and 93:
90 GILLES CARRON où H est la proje
- Page 94 and 95:
92 GILLES CARRON 2.a. Exemples repo
- Page 96 and 97:
94 GILLES CARRON alors si σ ∈ C
- Page 98 and 99:
96 GILLES CARRON Ainsi s’il exist
- Page 100 and 101:
98 GILLES CARRON Proposition 2.7. N
- Page 102 and 103:
100 GILLES CARRON l’espace des 1
- Page 104 and 105:
102 GILLES CARRON compact. De même
- Page 106 and 107:
104 GILLES CARRON 4. Application du
- Page 108 and 109:
106 GILLES CARRON Dans le cas où l
- Page 111 and 112:
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 113 and 114:
BRAIDED OPERATOR COMMUTATORS 111 Re
- Page 115 and 116:
BRAIDED OPERATOR COMMUTATORS 113 Re
- Page 117 and 118:
BRAIDED OPERATOR COMMUTATORS 115 3.
- Page 119 and 120:
Then, for 1 < k ≤ m + 1, we have
- Page 121 and 122:
BRAIDED OPERATOR COMMUTATORS 119 Mo
- Page 123 and 124:
BRAIDED OPERATOR COMMUTATORS 121 It
- Page 125:
E-mail address: prosk@imath.kiev.ua
- Page 128 and 129:
124 DANIEL J. MADDEN times. Further
- Page 130 and 131:
126 DANIEL J. MADDEN Further, s t
- Page 132 and 133:
128 DANIEL J. MADDEN Now the whole
- Page 134 and 135:
130 DANIEL J. MADDEN and β = 1 −
- Page 136 and 137:
132 DANIEL J. MADDEN We can simplif
- Page 138 and 139:
134 DANIEL J. MADDEN surd, but we n
- Page 140 and 141:
136 DANIEL J. MADDEN and d = d(u, v
- Page 142 and 143:
138 DANIEL J. MADDEN (6l + 7) k +
- Page 144 and 145:
140 DANIEL J. MADDEN Then the conti
- Page 146 and 147:
142 DANIEL J. MADDEN Thus n + 1 1 =
- Page 148 and 149:
144 DANIEL J. MADDEN If we take b =
- Page 150 and 151:
146 DANIEL J. MADDEN b, 2b(2bn + 1)
- Page 153 and 154:
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 155 and 156:
TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 157 and 158:
TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 159 and 160:
TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 161 and 162:
TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 163 and 164:
m n n n n TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIO
- Page 165 and 166: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 167 and 168: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 169 and 170: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 171 and 172: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 173 and 174: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 175 and 176: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 177 and 178: TANGLES, 2-HANDLE ADDITIONS AND DEH
- Page 179 and 180: PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 181 and 182: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 183 and 184: and SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENE
- Page 185 and 186: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 187 and 188: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 189 and 190: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 191 and 192: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 193 and 194: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 195 and 196: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 197 and 198: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 199 and 200: SOME CHARACTERIZATION, UNIQUENESS A
- Page 201 and 202: PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 203 and 204: SYMPLECTIC SUBMANIFOLDS FROM SURFAC
- Page 205 and 206: SYMPLECTIC SUBMANIFOLDS FROM SURFAC
- Page 207 and 208: SYMPLECTIC SUBMANIFOLDS FROM SURFAC
- Page 209: SYMPLECTIC SUBMANIFOLDS FROM SURFAC
- Page 212 and 213: 208 PAULO TIRAO Theorem. The affine
- Page 214 and 215: 210 PAULO TIRAO It follows from the
- Page 218 and 219: 214 PAULO TIRAO Theorem 2.7. Let ρ
- Page 220 and 221: 216 PAULO TIRAO Notation: By A = [
- Page 222 and 223: 218 PAULO TIRAO Now is not difficul
- Page 224 and 225: 220 PAULO TIRAO Regard H n (Z2 ⊕
- Page 226 and 227: 222 PAULO TIRAO is an isomorphism.
- Page 228 and 229: 224 PAULO TIRAO Lemma 4.2. Let Λ1
- Page 230 and 231: 226 PAULO TIRAO (c)1 B1 B2 B3 B1 0
- Page 232 and 233: 228 PAULO TIRAO ⎛ ⎜ B2 = ⎜
- Page 234 and 235: 230 PAULO TIRAO being those in whic
- Page 236 and 237: 232 PAULO TIRAO Hence, if ρ = m1χ
- Page 239 and 240: PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.
- Page 241 and 242: (1.6) HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 23
- Page 243 and 244: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 239 can
- Page 245 and 246: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 241 wher
- Page 247 and 248: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 243 Theo
- Page 249 and 250: Note (4.7) bD∩U ′ i dzA j J H
- Page 251 and 252: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 247 p. 1
- Page 253 and 254: similarly, we can prove HÖLDER REG
- Page 255 and 256: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 251 For
- Page 257 and 258: Now if n1 ≥ 2, l ∈ S1, then (4.
- Page 259 and 260: HÖLDER REGULARITY FOR ∂ 255 Refe
- Page 261 and 262: Guidelines for Authors Authors may